![]() |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 790794)
Waves, we need to look at our partners that are flying our code as well as our domestic bro's. What does a KLM pilot make? How about AF? We know what a SWA pilot takes home. How our your skills different than an Airborne, FedEx od UPS pilot?
Maybe it is time to find all of the money in the bag instead of falling for the IBB model. Better yet, how about breaking the current pay mold and adding revenue stream or segment surcharges to a base salary. Crap...didn't I see that Spirit charges for carry ons now? SWA pilots make more than we do by a sizable amount. As a matter of fact, their FA's are the highest payed in the industry. Guess who's FA's are near the bottom of the pay scale? You guessed it, DAL. I know that isn't our fight here, but it is mine. |
Originally Posted by Waves
(Post 790797)
SWA pilots make more than we do by a sizable amount. As a matter of fact, their FA's are the highest payed in the industry. Guess who's FA's are near the bottom of the pay scale? You guessed it, DAL. I know that isn't our fight here, but it is mine.
So what's the connection between SWA, FedEx, and UPS rates of pay (I'll leave out ABX because they're a shell of what they once were)... How does it differ from Delta's situation? All we need is a gun, right!? Oh, and how are SWA FA's rated compared to their peers in airline surveys? Does profitability affect pay? |
Originally Posted by Waves
(Post 790797)
I agree completely. I never fell for the IBB thing. I voted no for everything. Ha I have a standing no vote in the computer. :D By the way, when you post in all bold letters, it makes it look like your yelling at me. ;)
SWA pilots make more than we do by a sizable amount. As a matter of fact, their FA's are the highest payed in the industry. Guess who's FA's are near the bottom of the pay scale? You guessed it, DAL. I know that isn't our fight here, but it is mine. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 790805)
You're very confusing for a guy who worked so closely with management in the hiring process...:confused:
So what's the connection between SWA, FedEx, and UPS rates of pay (I'll leave out ABX because they're a shell of what they once were)... We perform the same skills with our FAA issued pilots lic. It appears you suggest they are worth more because they fly cargo and not pax? Do you imply we should make less than SWA as well? on what basis? How about the KLM/AF pilots???And no don"t leave out abx...they still have our old contract 2000 regardless of circumstances. How does it differ from Delta's situation? It should not. All we need is a gun, right!? No, unity and leadership. I'll submit we are lacking in that department. Oh, and how are SWA FA's rated compared to their peers in airline surveys? Does profitability affect pay? |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 790814)
Remember. It is all about the cash flow and revenue. Did they not just pay cash for the newest 777?
How about drawing a chart of Free Cash flow and profitability and compare it to various airline contracts over the last 10 years... It ain't all about the leadership. That plays a big part. But you're starting to break the code.:p Oh, they paid cash while we're $17 billion in debt. Compare that and DAL's interest service to our peers. Maybe you can come to some more logical conclusions!;) |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 790819)
Oh, they paid cash while we're $17 billion in debt. Compare that and DAL's interest service to our peers. It is the executive managements job to manage that debt. Period. Not the pilots. They can point to it all they want and scream that there is not enough for pay increases and benefit gains. "The pie is only so big." Excepting that is having your expectations professionally managed. Regardless, we should not be used as a tool to help with any of their business decisions. We should not except less to subsidize their management of the company and their executive compensation. Enough of being their ATM. Try selling their same arguement to Boeing, GE, Airbus, parts suppliers, Panasonic, and their fuel suppliers. The health of the balance sheet should not be an issue. We should be a fixed cost. We are really contractors just like the above named groups. Perhaps it is time to examine how we are paid...and have been so since the beinging of commercial aviation...and come up with some viable alternatives on either the Delta side or as a ALPA national. This will take unity and leadership. Both are sorely lacking. We need to build a good base before we can proceed and it starts with the leadership issue. That is essential at this point. Do we currently have the leadership that can accomplish this? |
Originally Posted by Hawaii50
(Post 790733)
Speaking of that, do you think we'll have any leverage to get this done on time? I can't see the usual foot dragging going over well with this group after the bending over we've done recently. If we don't have leverage it seems that we're primed to create our own. The contract ends Dec 31 2012. The new one should be in place on 1 Jan 2013.
|
SWA pay is high, but they still have one of the lowest block hour pilot costs around, so when your planes are flying more, you can pay the pilots more.
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 790805)
You're very confusing for a guy who worked so closely with management in the hiring process...:confused:
So what's the connection between SWA, FedEx, and UPS rates of pay (I'll leave out ABX because they're a shell of what they once were)... How does it differ from Delta's situation? All we need is a gun, right!? Oh, and how are SWA FA's rated compared to their peers in airline surveys? Does profitability affect pay? I guess the rest of your post has a meaning that wages are tied in with profitablity. Yes that is true, but we don't always have the luxury of negotiating when things are rosy. Due to the cyclical nature of our airline, we have gone through many contract negotiations on the economic down side. When times got good and we asked for a bump, the answer was, and I paraphrase, "Sorry Boys, but a contract is a contract." |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 790831)
There are all kinds of debt. Good and bad, high interest, low interest, short term and long. There are coporate bonds as well and their subsequent ratings.
It is the executive managements job to manage that debt. Period. Not the pilots. They can point to it all they want and scream that there is not enough for pay increases and benefit gains. "The pie is only so big." Excepting that is having your expectations professionally managed. Regardless, we should not be used as a tool to help with any of their business decisions. We should not except less to subsidize their management of the company and their executive compensation. Enough of being their ATM. Try selling their same arguement to Boeing, GE, Airbus, parts suppliers, Panasonic, and their fuel suppliers. The health of the balance sheet should not be an issue. We should be a fixed cost. We are really contractors just like the above named groups. Perhaps it is time to examine how we are paid...and have been so since the beinging of commercial aviation...and come up with some viable alternatives on either the Delta side or as a ALPA national. This will take unity and leadership. Both are sorely lacking. We need to build a good base before we can proceed and it starts with the leadership issue. That is essential at this point. Do we currently have the leadership that can accomplish this? You started down an argument regarding FedEx, ABX, UPS, and SWA. When the facts don't suit your argument.... btw, how big is ABX compared to 6 years ago? What's the total pilot payroll? I'd say they've given and given big....losing your job and your company is one hell of a concession. Ask Wilmington, Ohio how your theory is working out for them! I've lived the attitude that "it's management's problem." I watched a MEC administration that typed really bellicose letters and took no action. That brought me LOA 46, bankruptcy, and a terminated pension. It's my career. I'm not going to abdicate it to turnstyle "TheManager" again. Why some want to return to that mentality is astounding to me... It's management's problem...just live with the consequences....thanks!:rolleyes: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands