![]() |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 803122)
I don't hate, I only love! I agree that it wasn't designed to be commutable and I never expected it to be. But lately it has become capricious, arbitrary, and almost personal. Contractual rules on how short calls are assigned would go along way to alleviate that. Flexibility for IROPS can be written into the rules, but for Pete's sake there has to be something in ink.
Fixing the arbitrary assignment of short calls should be fairly easy. Making reserve "commutable" is a whole different ball game. That would cost us dearly in negotiating capital. I'd rather fix the pay rates. |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 803122)
I don't hate, I only love! I agree that it wasn't designed to be commutable and I never expected it to be. But lately it has become capricious, arbitrary, and almost personal. Contractual rules on how short calls are assigned would go along way to alleviate that. Flexibility for IROPS can be written into the rules, but for Pete's sake there has to be something in ink.
|
D-ALPA used to have some very good analysis of Delta's overlap with other carriers as they worked to predict the effect of various mergers. That data would be equally useful to quickly determine the overlap with United and Continental's tie up. ACL pointed out some of the areas, like Cleveland which might not survive consolidation.
However, it is my opinion we've all been getting a bit of a free ride as a result of United's mismanagement. If United was run by Continental (which is assumed would be the result) then they would be a much more viable competitor. US Air will likely be broken up, or merged in parts. In the mean time I see them as kind of a supercharged Spirit. An airline that makes little sense, other than the fact their costs are so incredibly low that they bounce along in ground effect. |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 803122)
I don't hate, I only love! I agree that it wasn't designed to be commutable and I never expected it to be. But lately it has become capricious, arbitrary, and almost personal. Contractual rules on how short calls are assigned would go along way to alleviate that. Flexibility for IROPS can be written into the rules, but for Pete's sake there has to be something in ink.
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 803127)
+1.
Fixing the arbitrary assignment of short calls should be fairly easy. |
It seems to me that CLE would serve as a good pressure relief valve for ORD. Much lik MEM for ATL. I would think they would hold onto to CLE for that reason alone.
|
It was much more commutable when it was an international category. Nothing less than three day trips.
|
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 803029)
It's almost punitive. They are thinking they are safe with the highest raws in the category, a dozen 2 day bucket people ahead of them and nothing in open time. Then BAM! Short call. There were so many more people above them who would make more sense. I would be ****ed!
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 803139)
It seems to me that CLE would serve as a good pressure relief valve for ORD. Much lik MEM for ATL. I would think they would hold onto to CLE for that reason alone.
ORD is always goo, DEN is good, and IAH. That is still a lot of coverage in the midwest. Gaining GUM and SFO, LAX is great for CAL. |
All the contract needs is a new slip for being on call. Maybe a PURPLE SLIP that puts a reserve pilot at the front of the list to pick up a trip when one comes in to open time, same day next day, reguardless of ROU. Senoirity bases that trumps it all. If that pilot wants 85 hours on reserve than so be it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands