Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Heyas Guys,
Doesn't this violate our scope big time?
Posted on the NMB website. National Mediation Board finding:
"Chautauqua Airlines (Chautauqua), Shuttle America (Shuttle), Republic Airlines (RA), and Midwest Airlines (Midwest) are operating as a single transportation system known as Republic Airways Holdings, Inc."
In addition:
"Midwest will surrender its [FAA] Operating Certificate to the Department of Transportation and return its IATA designator code of "YX" to that agency. At that point Midwest will cease to exist as an air carrier, as it will have neither operational aircraft nor an operating certificate . . . . Republic will then seek permission to operate RA as RA d/b/a Midwest . . . . Midwest will eventually be dissolved and Republic Airlines will replace the aircraft operations of Midwest using its current assets and operate as Republic Airlines d/b/a Midwest Airlines [MWA]."
Check it out at:
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2010/37n032.pdf
Nu
Doesn't this violate our scope big time?
Posted on the NMB website. National Mediation Board finding:
"Chautauqua Airlines (Chautauqua), Shuttle America (Shuttle), Republic Airlines (RA), and Midwest Airlines (Midwest) are operating as a single transportation system known as Republic Airways Holdings, Inc."
In addition:
"Midwest will surrender its [FAA] Operating Certificate to the Department of Transportation and return its IATA designator code of "YX" to that agency. At that point Midwest will cease to exist as an air carrier, as it will have neither operational aircraft nor an operating certificate . . . . Republic will then seek permission to operate RA as RA d/b/a Midwest . . . . Midwest will eventually be dissolved and Republic Airlines will replace the aircraft operations of Midwest using its current assets and operate as Republic Airlines d/b/a Midwest Airlines [MWA]."
Check it out at:
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2010/37n032.pdf
Nu
Heyas Guys,
Doesn't this violate our scope big time?
Posted on the NMB website. National Mediation Board finding:
"Chautauqua Airlines (Chautauqua), Shuttle America (Shuttle), Republic Airlines (RA), and Midwest Airlines (Midwest) are operating as a single transportation system known as Republic Airways Holdings, Inc."
In addition:
"Midwest will surrender its [FAA] Operating Certificate to the Department of Transportation and return its IATA designator code of "YX" to that agency. At that point Midwest will cease to exist as an air carrier, as it will have neither operational aircraft nor an operating certificate . . . . Republic will then seek permission to operate RA as RA d/b/a Midwest . . . . Midwest will eventually be dissolved and Republic Airlines will replace the aircraft operations of Midwest using its current assets and operate as Republic Airlines d/b/a Midwest Airlines [MWA]."
Check it out at:
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2010/37n032.pdf
Nu
Doesn't this violate our scope big time?
Posted on the NMB website. National Mediation Board finding:
"Chautauqua Airlines (Chautauqua), Shuttle America (Shuttle), Republic Airlines (RA), and Midwest Airlines (Midwest) are operating as a single transportation system known as Republic Airways Holdings, Inc."
In addition:
"Midwest will surrender its [FAA] Operating Certificate to the Department of Transportation and return its IATA designator code of "YX" to that agency. At that point Midwest will cease to exist as an air carrier, as it will have neither operational aircraft nor an operating certificate . . . . Republic will then seek permission to operate RA as RA d/b/a Midwest . . . . Midwest will eventually be dissolved and Republic Airlines will replace the aircraft operations of Midwest using its current assets and operate as Republic Airlines d/b/a Midwest Airlines [MWA]."
Check it out at:
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2010/37n032.pdf
Nu
Unfortunately, no.
Our scope looks at certificates, not business entities. We've barked up that tree several times...
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
There are multiple short, short, calls every day on the ATL 73N B. I get two or three SC a month.
Last edited by Ad Lib; 05-10-2010 at 07:56 PM.
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Gear yanking 76ER class worker....."one ping only. Vasili.."
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Gear yanking 76ER class worker....."one ping only. Vasili.."
Why?? Right now whatever WE negotiate the company costs that as a "me to" for the flight attendants. If they have their union, then they can negotiate stuff for themselves instead of getting stuff we negotiate for nothing. The commuter policy that the North guys had is a good example. If they gave that to the pilots, they most likely would have had to give it to the FA's. With a FA union, the company would give them nothing except what they negotiate making it easier for us to get stuff. I think it would be great to have them unionized.
no mention of our fnwa grievance that just got shot down about re-capturing a big chunk of $$ from said "me-too" clause
it is a close call as to which is better; non-union vs. union F/A's for us.....
I'm amazed at the lack of knowledge from our current fnwa F/A's on the current standing/decisions/issues...hopefully it will all be resolved soon.
In the truly latest and greatest about Delta,
Has anyone noticed that the 500 foot "checks" call has dissappeared? Sound the horns and slaughter the fat cow! Things really do change for the better!
In other news- I'm only able to enter in 24 choices on my VD list... is anyone else restricted to that? It won't go over to page 3...
Has anyone noticed that the 500 foot "checks" call has dissappeared? Sound the horns and slaughter the fat cow! Things really do change for the better!
In other news- I'm only able to enter in 24 choices on my VD list... is anyone else restricted to that? It won't go over to page 3...
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
That was Bar's point. It appears to have been clarified as two hours prior to departure with the assumption the other pilot will perform the reserve pilot's job and the reserve pilot will forgo a wx, pubs, bulletin check. If someone wanted a little more time to do their job they would be tolerated.
IMHO, that's unsat. Unlike our LA based brethren, the 73N Atlanta guys are getting short, short, called almost every day.
IMHO, that's unsat. Unlike our LA based brethren, the 73N Atlanta guys are getting short, short, called almost every day.
If they need someone to push in two hours or less they can re-route someone instead of putting us in a position that could have a bad outcome. Even if you live a 30 minute drive from the airport you have to hurry to push two hours from the call. I think the policy should be when they call you they ask how long it will take you to get to the airport. If it is longer than what they need, they should call the next guy. If they don't have anyone that can make it, re-route someone. If they can't re-route someone, delay the flight for however long it takes for a reserve guy to get to the airport without speeding or cutting corners.
I hate to even bring this deal up, but maybe airport reserve shifts could wipe out the short, short calls. If we had shifts that were 5 hours long, paid you 5 hours of credit for sitting there, and people could volunteer to do them, might not be too bad of a deal. I'd grab a couple of them to higher my RAW score up so I would be less likely to get a 4-day trip.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


BUT REMEBER... The FA's are very highly educated, have a skill, very difficult to attain, and have put 1000's of hours into their training to safely do their job w/o killing anyone... 


