![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 545507)
Already forecasted to be a loss of .33 a share. Not bad about 70 million in the red. Looking for a loss in the first quarter as well. Then black for the rest of 09.
Should have 7.99 billion in revenue for the fourth quarter of 2007 as well. Still on the buy list of stocks. Love your posts but this one is a good reminder to never get investment advice from a pilot. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 546687)
Finally, A FNWA jet that looks almost as good in DAL paint as it did in NWA paint!
The DELTA is still too small. |
Originally Posted by Bigflya
(Post 546775)
ACL,
Love your posts but this one is a good reminder to never get investment advice from a pilot. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 546300)
Job security won't exist in this industry until Dec 2012 when the old guys start to retire again. If we had guys retiring right now, we would be hiring. Age 65 is much worse for us than a bad economy and high fuel prices IMO.
Age 65 does not mean too much right now for a few reasons. 1) DAL has no one even 59 on staff. 2) Some FNWA guys are actually deciding to retire at 60 since they still have a pension. 3) No data exists (nor will it for at least 4 years) of how many folks will choose not to retire AND be able to hold a first class medical until their 65th bday. I've been with DAL only 10 months but have already moved up about 45 numbers. Not bad for a co with no scheduled retirements. In a pilot group of over 12k, there will be attrition in the next few years due to a wide variety of factors including retirement, disability, quitting, firing, extended vol/mil leaves amongst others. Just hang on. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 546761)
As I was saying the staffing issues are not with the FNWA fleet. DAL does not really have any staffing issues either. It is if they cut again. If and when that happens we may see significant over staffing on both tickets.
|
I was repeating what the street guidance was nothing more. I could not given any other information other than that. It would be against SEC regulations. You know that.
|
I have also stated that I am betting on DAL stock being North of 20 a share by the end of next year, (2010) That is just my guess.
|
Originally Posted by Bigflya
(Post 546784)
Rocky,
Age 65 does not mean too much right now for a few reasons. 1) DAL has no one even 59 on staff. 2) Some FNWA guys are actually deciding to retire at 60 since they still have a pension. 3) No data exists (nor will it for at least 4 years) of how many folks will choose not to retire AND be able to hold a first class medical until their 65th bday. I've been with DAL only 10 months but have already moved up about 45 numbers. Not bad for a co with no scheduled retirements. In a pilot group of over 12k, there will be attrition in the next few years due to a wide variety of factors including retirement, disability, quitting, firing, extended vol/mil leaves amongst others. Just hang on. |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 546684)
The one caveat I hope is put in place is a more stringent Class I medical. That my end up reducing the numbers of senior pilots more that the 65 rule.
|
Originally Posted by ITSALLGOOD
(Post 546804)
Uh...I know you mean well Bigflya...but your age 59 comment is simply not true. Look at the retirement list on the crew resources page...it has birthdates...and there are about 60ish on the list who have seen their 60th B-day come and go. You can do a quick cross reference of the Jan seniority list to see most are still flying. More important, I have flown with two over 60 Capts in the last month.
I have to admit your right. Bad math on me. I'm still stuck in 2007. Correct numbers are 5 61 yr olds and 57 60 yr olds. This list is dated Jan2008 and I saw only one pilot retirement in the back of the 4th Q magazine but who knows if any left before that. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands