![]() |
I like it. Now on the left and future on the right.
http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...id/temp-65.jpg But that connector is a real MISS, a real WIN would've been another Jerry Garcia Memorial Walkway to match the one in DTW: http://www.visitingdc.com/images/det...rport-code.jpg |
Will any part of the old exterior of the Pan Am terminal be retained?
|
Originally Posted by RoughLandings
(Post 854157)
Looks nice, but why would they leave the area of the old T3 to be hardstands? Couldn't they have fit another pier in there and have some gates? Whatever, as long as long as the T2/T3 alley is gone, I'm happy.
I hear that 2 is not getting a face-lift, which leads me to suspect (no rumors: just a guess) there is a follow-on phase to this project that would build something on top of 2 and 3. Maybe even 1. I would also suspect there isn't funding or appetite for any of that, right now. |
Seems like it would be awfully smart to allow aircraft to taxi right next to the connector, between LA and the Kilos, through the pointy end of the concrete parking pad.
The way the picture shows it, this setup is still subject to gridlock at LA and MA. |
Originally Posted by RoughLandings
(Post 854157)
Looks nice, but why would they leave the area of the old T3 to be hardstands? Couldn't they have fit another pier in there and have some gates? Whatever, as long as long as the T2/T3 alley is gone, I'm happy.
EDIT: I cannot format the picture properly, so here's the link... http://filecache.drivetheweb.com/mr4...ior-future.jpg I'll tell ya, though. That's going to be a heck of a walk between T2 and T4. And knowing JFK, those moving walkways will only be working about 20% of the time. "Excuse the cart, please... Excuse the cart." |
Originally Posted by Nosmo King
(Post 853858)
I have a Droid2 reserved for purchase Friday on a layover :D
I've looked at the Droid X but that sucker's just too big. I like the size of the Incredible, but it feels flimsy and I've heard the battery life on it sucks. So it looks like the Droid 2 for me. Nosmo, let me know what you think of it. |
Originally Posted by upndsky
(Post 854202)
I don't think they're going to be hardstands in the sense of boarding people, but rather just spaces for parking aircraft during the inbound/outbound Europe lull. If you notice, the T4 terminals are being expanded, gobbling up the parking spaces that are currently there.
I'll tell ya, though. That's going to be a heck of a walk between T2 and T4. And knowing JFK, those moving walkways will only be working about 20% of the time. "Excuse the cart, please... Excuse the cart." |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 854161)
I really don't think they can get much worse. My 8:27 DTW-PHX 12 hour overnight PHX-DTW redeye back isn't exactly a prime trip. Or my DH DTW-FLL work FLL-LGA DH LGA-DTW doesn't have the lineholders drooling. Or maybe a lineholder will want to steal my DH DTW-SEA 11 hours rest SEA-DTW redeye back.
They ain't gettin much worse. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 854188)
I understand one of the key features is a bi-directional taxiway between piers, one on which you can make a U-turn at the bottom of the alley. It looks to me like the Kilos are going further from terminal 4 to accomplish this. So... if you were to have a pier where 3 now stands, and it was shifted SW to accomodate the taxiways, the NW corner of that pier would interfere with 2. I'm sure they could redesign 2 and 3 in such a way as to maximize space available, and not end up with a big parking lot, but I guess the costs would probably double.
I hear that 2 is not getting a face-lift, which leads me to suspect (no rumors: just a guess) there is a follow-on phase to this project that would build something on top of 2 and 3. Maybe even 1. I would also suspect there isn't funding or appetite for any of that, right now. You think the way I do. I make sense to wait and see what if anything AMR and Jet Blue do. If there is a marriage we have good reason to go after the Jet Blue terminal since it could be our domestic terminal. We could then throw the rest of the T-4 occupants to two.....:D |
Originally Posted by RoughLandings
(Post 854157)
Looks nice, but why would they leave the area of the old T3 to be hardstands? Couldn't they have fit another pier in there and have some gates? Whatever, as long as long as the T2/T3 alley is gone, I'm happy.
EDIT: I cannot format the picture properly, so here's the link... http://filecache.drivetheweb.com/mr4...ior-future.jpg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:45 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands