![]() |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 868544)
I still think that a junior guy with an MD cannot prohibit a senior guy with an AE from taking a vacant position.
The AE won't be awarded. That's how I read 22E1. ?? |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 868552)
He can if the AE together with the MD would cause a displacement.
The AE won't be awarded. That's how I read 22E1. ?? Heading down to Riu PUJ this Monday. Check your PM inbox. I've got some questions for ya. Thanks. :) |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 868552)
He can if the AE together with the MD would cause a displacement.
The AE won't be awarded. That's how I read 22E1. ?? |
Originally Posted by contrails
(Post 868550)
When Carl Spackler wants to park, he parks:
YouTube - DAL JFK 2010 08 14.avi Glad nobody was hurt. :eek: |
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 868344)
The N side bidding into different bases was all part of the seniority negotiations right? They said we wouldn't get as much credit for upcoming attrition but we'd be able to bid into "higher paying positions" instead. Now the shifting is happening on both sides and hopefully so is the attrition!!
AE's SUCK btw, just saying.... On a positive note, a buddy of mine at another unnamed carrier picked up a better paying airframe two months after me, was paid for it the 1st of the following month and is already flying it while I plan my next MD. So much for the arbitrators' reasoning... I'd go back to fNWA tomorrow with 400 retirements in the rear view mirror. On a different note, CRJ-900s parked at the main terminal in DTW.... Don't we have pay rates for those? Sorry, grumpy after a four day with a reduced rest overnight before day four. |
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 868578)
I'll Ive seen so far is a displacement into a lower paying airframe, block back to reserve, a follow on AE, but realistically another MD prior to conversion. I'm sure that MD will have another 210 day conversion for a total of 400+ days after my initial MD to the DC-9. Essentially seat locked after an MD because ATL over issues AE for morale that they knowingly will never honor; pseudo seat lock. This AE system is garbage.
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 868552)
He can if the AE together with the MD would cause a displacement.
The AE won't be awarded. That's how I read 22E1. ?? |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 868552)
He can if the AE together with the MD would cause a displacement.
The AE won't be awarded. That's how I read 22E1. ?? |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 868589)
You may be right, I've never called ALPA to ask that specific question. I've spent alot of time talking to ALPA the last two bids, and basically was told that seniority will always win whether it is an AE or an MD. In this case I would assume the AE would be awarded and the MD would go to his next bid preference thus not causing a displacement. If your right, then I guess I could use my MD from the SLC 320 to take up a vacancy on the 777 in ATL if that is the case? Just doesn't seem right to me that it would work that way, but alot of stuff doesn't make sense to me. :)
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 868589)
You may be right, I've never called ALPA to ask that specific question. I've spent alot of time talking to ALPA the last two bids, and basically was told that seniority will always win whether it is an AE or an MD. In this case I would assume the AE would be awarded and the MD would go to his next bid preference thus not causing a displacement. If your right, then I guess I could use my MD from the SLC 320 to take up a vacancy on the 777 in ATL if that is the case? Just doesn't seem right to me that it would work that way, but alot of stuff doesn't make sense to me. :)
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands