Sink r8

Didn't get the memo yet? Congratulations anyway!

tsquare

This rings sadly of the NWA/Republic merger. I really don't want to go down THAT road, but unfortunately it would be nothing close to a merger of equals. And even if this ever happens, I still think the ploy of "super premium" was the stupidest thing I ever heard. Simply "widebody" would suffice in this case.

tsquare

this^^^^^^^^^ well said young man!

tsquare

Huh, wha??????

Sink r8

One of the blurbs that addresses this may be Dickson's letter on the latest AE. I think he said we wouldn't be backfilling some narrowbody F/O position because they were learning to make more efficient (for them...) rotations. Considering some of the selling of the merger involved the idea that staffing would have to be increased by having you go to the new work-rules... I'd have to agree some of the math is funny. For starters, analysts want to hear we're keeping capacity down, and pilots want to hear staffing is going up. Takes a lot of real smooth talking, and a lot of fancy math to explain both.

Then there is the slight problem of the 747-200 and DC-9's going, along with airplanes going to the desert, to be pulled out later, where the rate of airplanes going from the desert is going towards infinity, while the rate of aircraft coming from the desert is also mind-numbing, but few people have found rattlesnakes while doing preflights. So there is some confusing desert math (super-dry), and also some funny Chinese math, and who wants to do MD-90 math with the Chinese anyway? 16 airplanes promised for four years + 1 in the paint shop every week for four years X 1 being ferried across monthly = 0 line pilots in an actual a Chinese aircraft. Remember the scene in Airport (I think 77) where Dean Martin tries to explain to the kid how a star went fron one side of the aircraft to the other, but they didn't do a 180? That's another kind of math we're talking about: spacial math from Uranus.

There is of course another area of this math that explains the fact we don't need as many as we thought before and after, which is a lot less funny, and it revives the SLI wounds. So while I'm not super-happy about some of the fuzzy math that's being blown around here lately, it's at least good there is still a job for everyone post-merger, and a few more to boot. That'll work for me.

Sink r8

Retirement age has been lowered to 45. Can I borrow your epaulets?

forgot to bid

The nice answer would be that capacity is holding steady (i.e. not growing to over capacity) because flying is being shifted from regionals to mainline.

Also, that while nobody is in a Chinese MD90, yet, that if whatever the issue is gets resolved quickly then they'll flood in.

but hey, puff puff pass... PUFF PUFF PASS...

forgot to bid

I think of it more like what if 1,000 of us are furloughed and then we merge with Alaska. Why not keep furloughed pilots in the mix, it doesn't mean you have to bring them back immediately and furlough others, they just don't come back until hiring resumes and then they come back in place. We're used to bypass guys doing it.

Just saying, if we furloughed that's how I'd want it.

Now as to plan B. That's the Free Buzz Pat plan. It'd also flood the market with capacity, however, in the Alaska case if AMR bought them couldn't we grow on our own as we'd all like because what we already have is SEA and LAX international connections. It's doable, once somebody buys Alaska.

Which I hope is AMR, and I hope we battle them out and run the price up and win that.

FrankCobretti

Wow. I'd have higher relative seniority on MSP 7ER than I do on NYC 73N. Surprising.

FrankCobretti

Since we're all buzzing about a possible Alaska merger, doesn't Alaska have some kind of onerous burden wrt servicing tiny Alaskan airports way out in the tundra someplace?