![]() |
Originally Posted by Gladioslave
(Post 926211)
Me neither since me merged with DAL N!!:eek:
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 926234)
Really? REALLY?
Utter BS. Delta pilots on this webboard asked for some form of proof/documentation so we could enforce our contract. ALPA went to management. They did investigate, and scope was enforced. That is the problem with DALPA. What do they do all day in the office when they are not sitting around the Happy Buddah or BBQ Kitchen? DALPA should have been on the leading edge of this. They should constantly have the pulse of what is happening at any given moment WRT scope. The line pilots were the ones who discovered this and asked for enforcement, and when they did, they were originally berated by Moak. This happening in light of all that resistance from the MEC in response to the resolution for a scope report card as well ?!?! Shameful. DALPA has been extremely negligent in enforcing scope at this airline. The line pilots deserve better than what they have currently received to date. There is no attention to detail IRT this issue with DALPA as they do not have their eye on the ball at all. |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 926247)
Heyas,
RE: The recent lack of scope message. You will NEVER see a message about scope come out of the MEC Officers. Never. It's a betting game. "They" risk alienating what is soon to become the majority of ALPA members, versus another group saber rattling about bringing in a new union. I'm thinking that they're betting right. Nu This was the SINGLE reason (not to be a one-issue kinda guy :) ) that tipped the balance for me to send in a DPA card. I'm all for sticking with ALPA if DALPA can make it clear we intend to make every attempt to start in-sourcing! Anything less is unacceptable. FWIW I've heard that the new administration wants to hold off firing up the P2P machine until after May because they fear it will connect the pilots and help organize DPA, as apparently that's how P2P was used at USAir to organize USAPA. Btw May is when the oldest DPA cards become invalid as they have to be < a year old for a vote to be forced. This is disheartening to say the least that they purposely want to keep us from communicating better. How about 2-way communication that results in what the pilots as a whole want - sorta the entire reason for P2P in my opinion??? They could squash DPA tomorrow forever if they took a strong public position that DELTA PILOTS FLY DELTA PASSENGERS!!! |
Same here. Just wondering if I was doing something wrong. I guess it is just Delta technology:(
Originally Posted by Jughead
(Post 926237)
That's happened to me a few times over the last month. I restart my computer and try again, and it works fine. No idea why.
|
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 926243)
I have a hard time understanding, why Mainline flying needs to be outsourced. SWA doesnt outsource and look at their compensation and profits and culture. TYG However, they are becoming more and more similar. Southwest just dramatically revamped its frequent flyer program to better match the legacy programs. It will drive more loyalty and now includes the ability to fly to Hawaii and internationally. Not identical to traditional programs, but more similar than ever before. Speaking of operating more like legacy carriers, this is certainly not the greatest news for southwest: Southwest on-time rate falls to less than 55% says data report By Lewis Lazare Media/Marketing columnist Jan 6, 2011 6:17AM ShareE-MailPrint 10-12-10 Southwest Airlines at Midway airport. photo by Jean Lachat/Sun-Times Southwest Airlines’ on-time arrival performance took another huge hit in December, according to data released this week by Portland, Ore.-based Flightstats, a respected provided of airline performance data. The grim news for the low-fare carrier came as the U.S. Department of Transportation asked Southwest Airlines to explain why the data independently collected by Flightstats has begun to diverge so markedly in recent months from the on-time statistics Southwest internally generates and provides each month to the DOT. According to Flightstats, only 54.65 percent of Southwest planes arrived on time in December. “On time” is defined as arriving at the gate within 15 minutes of the scheduled time. In December Southwest was dead last in on-time arrival performance among the 42 largest domestic carriers Flightstats tracks each month, the first time in recent memory — perhaps ever — that Southwest has been at the very bottom of the list. Even though bad weather was a major factor impacting on-time performance for many carriers in December, both United Airlines and American Airlines still got 82.61 percent and 80.47 percent of their flights respectively to the gate on time for the month, according to Flightstats. Southwest spokeswoman Brandy King would not reveal the airline’s own internally generated on-time arrival data for December, but she did say it was “significantly” higher than the 54.65 percent Flightstats is reporting. There was also a significant discrepancy in the November numbers. Southwest executives in recent months have repeatedly said they were at a loss to explain why the Flightstats data has suddenly begun to differ so markedly from the airline’s own statistics. But the carrier has conceded it is grappling with several big operational issues, including record load factors and a growing number of connecting passengers at airports such as Chicago’s Midway, where Southwest is by far the dominant airline. Record load factors have made it tougher to deplane passengers and load outbound travelers in the 25 to 35 minutes Southwest typically allots for the process. And increasingly, outbound planes at airports such as Midway have been held for late-arriving connecting passengers. Getting connecting luggage to the right planes has been a struggle as well. Southwest also recently announced new senior executives in both its operations and scheduling departments, two key areas directly involved in the airline’s on-time performance. For the past several months, Flightstats has indicated it was eager to work with Southwest to figure out why its data has begun to differ so markedly from Southwest’s internal statistics. Flightstats did get a call from Southwest after the Department of Transportation said on Tuesday that it wanted an explanation. “Flightstats is pleased to be working with Southwest,” said spokeswoman Meara McLaughlin, adding “we only want to represent true, timely and accurate data about the airlines.” Southwest Airlines On-Time Arrival Performance August through December 2010 Flightstats U.S. Department of Transportation August 81.2% 82.3 September 78.50 86.3 October 65.48 77.9 November 66.56 not yet released December 54.65 not yet released |
Originally Posted by NERD
(Post 926281)
Same here. Just wondering if I was doing something wrong. I guess it is just Delta technology:(
|
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 926274)
They could squash DPA tomorrow forever if they took a strong public position that DELTA PILOTS FLY DELTA PASSENGERS!!! DPA would be quickly swept into the dust bin of history if this and a few other basic changes were made. 1. True Bottom to top representation. 2. Complete transparency. FPL every month. Quarterly publishing of budget and accounts receivable and payable. (to include trips and incidentals at The Diplomate) ;) 3. Effective communications commitee and tools. Not tools on the communications committee. Those are my top three in addition to scope stance. Feel free to add. |
Originally Posted by Gladioslave
(Post 926211)
Me neither since me merged with DAL N!!:eek:
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 926232)
This one gets the "stupid post of the day" award, imo.:mad:
You might think you won't see the left seat for that long because of the merger, but I think you kept a seat and aren't looking in from the outside from furlough (like every other major carrier had). It gets an extra vote from me, too. The time to the left seat at NWA was pretty much the same as it was at Delta, before the merger. For everyone bashing slow on this one, I don't see how it this post is a pro-ALPA post at all. It seems to me that is it more of a pro-merger post. What am I missing? |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 926293)
Way to go slow,
It gets an extra vote from me, too. The time to the left seat at NWA was pretty much the same as it was at Delta, before the merger. For everyone bashing slow on this one, I don't see how it this post is a pro-ALPA post at all. It seems to me that is it more of a pro-merger post. What am I missing? |
Originally Posted by JABDIP
(Post 926300)
What is missed by some of the fDAL guys is the age demographics of the 2 groups. There are a lot more retirements percentage wise on the fNWA side in the near future that allows ALL pilots to move up. If those retirements were not here, the movement on the fDAL side would be slower than it actually will be in the future.:)
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands