![]() |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 948884)
Hey Slow or Sailing, since ya'll may be one in the same
http://abbysdvdshop.com/img/12/718/1.jpg everything always seems to have a cost. But does adding a raw score value to SC even if unused be a no cost simple addition to reserve rules? |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 948758)
I dont think voluntarily violated Golden Days get paid back.
If I want to attempt rolling thunder, I want my Golden Days at the front of the month or on weekends. That way they can't mess with the days that are most likely to have low coverage and GS trips awarded. |
|
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 948931)
|
Poor ***** Cats
|
What the Smart Investors Are Buying - Yahoo! Finance
The takeaway ... 3. George Soros Soros's fund more than quadrupled down on its position in Delta Airlines (NYSE: DAL - News), buying more than 11 million shares last quarter. You probably forgot that airlines could make good investments. So did everyone else. But in truth, the airline industry cut out so much excess capacity during the recession that its pricing power is now returning. Seats are full. Ticket prices are rising. The end of 2010 was the first time in more than 10 years that the industry had a profitable fourth quarter. |
Originally Posted by Jesse
(Post 948543)
Here's some help to get that image out of your head.
http://i1215.photobucket.com/albums/...g?t=1297871989 TYG |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 948947)
OHHHHH! Me want badly! UHHHHHHH those are cool.
TYG |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 948939)
What the Smart Investors Are Buying - Yahoo! Finance
The takeaway ... 3. George Soros Soros's fund more than quadrupled down on its position in Delta Airlines (NYSE: DAL - News), buying more than 11 million shares last quarter. You probably forgot that airlines could make good investments. So did everyone else. But in truth, the airline industry cut out so much excess capacity during the recession that its pricing power is now returning. Seats are full. Ticket prices are rising. The end of 2010 was the first time in more than 10 years that the industry had a profitable fourth quarter. |
Originally Posted by chuck416
(Post 948936)
In print, that sounds heartless. The reality is, that the owner should have read the the paperwork she purchased. Company is not responsible when temp. is below freezing. And come on, a hairless animal, in a cargo bin, in dead of winter. No amount of $ is going to "fix" the problem for this pet owner. The company doesn't actually, or perhaps (arguably) even morally, owe her a nickel. But get it in the press, and DAL looks like the bad guy....somethin' bad wrong with that.
Actually, the company can refuse to accept the pet at check-in when the temps are below 10 degrees F. If we accept the pet, we accept responsibility. Shipping pets is not a cheap endeavor. Now, you could ask the questions why the person just didn't carry the cat on board. Or the owner could have tried to do what this bright women tried. If not for postal clerks, puppy would have been DOA | StarTribune.com |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands