Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

gloopy 02-16-2011 06:51 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 948884)
Hey Slow or Sailing, since ya'll may be one in the same

http://abbysdvdshop.com/img/12/718/1.jpg

everything always seems to have a cost. But does adding a raw score value to SC even if unused be a no cost simple addition to reserve rules?

Makes sense to me and would lead to significant QOL improvements for many reserves without any negative side that I can see.

RockyBoy 02-16-2011 06:55 PM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 948758)
I dont think voluntarily violated Golden Days get paid back.

Yep, you can GS on your Golden Days and they get paid back just like any other day off. You just can't get an IA on a Golden Day and scheduling is suppose to use their "best efforts" to not re-route you into your Golden Days. If you get a GS on a Golden Day you get a PB day for working that day and that PB day is not a Golden Day if that is the point you are trying to get across.

If I want to attempt rolling thunder, I want my Golden Days at the front of the month or on weekends. That way they can't mess with the days that are most likely to have low coverage and GS trips awarded.

KC10 FATboy 02-16-2011 07:20 PM

Delta offer to dead kitten's owner: $50 and air fare | Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal

chuck416 02-16-2011 07:36 PM

In print, that sounds heartless. The reality is, that the owner should have read the the paperwork she purchased. Company is not responsible when temp. is below freezing. And come on, a hairless animal, in a cargo bin, in dead of winter. No amount of $ is going to "fix" the problem for this pet owner. The company doesn't actually, or perhaps (arguably) even morally, owe her a nickel. But get it in the press, and DAL looks like the bad guy....somethin' bad wrong with that.

MongoC5 02-16-2011 07:37 PM

Poor ***** Cats
 
http://podgecast.com/wp-content/uplo...tion-kitty.jpg

KC10 FATboy 02-16-2011 07:40 PM

What the Smart Investors Are Buying - Yahoo! Finance

The takeaway ...

3. George Soros
Soros's fund more than quadrupled down on its position in Delta Airlines (NYSE: DAL - News), buying more than 11 million shares last quarter.

You probably forgot that airlines could make good investments. So did everyone else. But in truth, the airline industry cut out so much excess capacity during the recession that its pricing power is now returning. Seats are full. Ticket prices are rising. The end of 2010 was the first time in more than 10 years that the industry had a profitable fourth quarter.

TenYearsGone 02-16-2011 08:08 PM


Originally Posted by Jesse (Post 948543)
Here's some help to get that image out of your head.

http://i1215.photobucket.com/albums/...g?t=1297871989

OHHHHH! Me want badly! UHHHHHHH those are cool.

TYG

buzzpat 02-16-2011 08:49 PM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 948947)
OHHHHH! Me want badly! UHHHHHHH those are cool.

TYG

That's my wife....stop it. ;)

buzzpat 02-16-2011 08:50 PM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 948939)
What the Smart Investors Are Buying - Yahoo! Finance

The takeaway ...

3. George Soros
Soros's fund more than quadrupled down on its position in Delta Airlines (NYSE: DAL - News), buying more than 11 million shares last quarter.

You probably forgot that airlines could make good investments. So did everyone else. But in truth, the airline industry cut out so much excess capacity during the recession that its pricing power is now returning. Seats are full. Ticket prices are rising. The end of 2010 was the first time in more than 10 years that the industry had a profitable fourth quarter.

So Soros is one of our major investors? Good God.......

1234 02-16-2011 09:42 PM


Originally Posted by chuck416 (Post 948936)
In print, that sounds heartless. The reality is, that the owner should have read the the paperwork she purchased. Company is not responsible when temp. is below freezing. And come on, a hairless animal, in a cargo bin, in dead of winter. No amount of $ is going to "fix" the problem for this pet owner. The company doesn't actually, or perhaps (arguably) even morally, owe her a nickel. But get it in the press, and DAL looks like the bad guy....somethin' bad wrong with that.


Actually, the company can refuse to accept the pet at check-in when the temps are below 10 degrees F. If we accept the pet, we accept responsibility. Shipping pets is not a cheap endeavor. Now, you could ask the questions why the person just didn't carry the cat on board. Or the owner could have tried to do what this bright women tried. If not for postal clerks, puppy would have been DOA | StarTribune.com


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands