Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Heyas,
Things that make you go "hmmmm":
Why did the AirTran pilots INSIST on keeping OUTSIDE counsel for section one (scope) when they joined ALPA?
Nu
Things that make you go "hmmmm":
Why did the AirTran pilots INSIST on keeping OUTSIDE counsel for section one (scope) when they joined ALPA?
Nu
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
I am surprised (actually not really) that the Code-A-Phone made no mention of the decision or the indication that DALPA/ALPA is aware of the ruling and are "thoroughly researching this ruling to determine if there is any impact to our PWA"
You can't possibly tell me that this ruling has caught our Union off guard. The actions take by DALPA may just be what the DPA movement needs to gain momentum. (note: I have not sent in a card yet, but will be watching what comes of this closely as will many of our pilots that haven't sent in a card).
You can't possibly tell me that this ruling has caught our Union off guard. The actions take by DALPA may just be what the DPA movement needs to gain momentum. (note: I have not sent in a card yet, but will be watching what comes of this closely as will many of our pilots that haven't sent in a card).
1) Someone on the internet reports an event and suggests an implication.
2) Someone else takes the ball and runs with it.
3) Someone with some other agenda jumps all over it to criticize the union, or the current people in the union.
4) Someone that's a close supporter of the union, or the current people in the union, jumps in for counter-insurgency and interference.
5) One of these two (above) starts calling the other one stupid.
6) Stupid follows-up with a "I know you are but what am I?"
7) Someone jumps in once again to re-driect, and offers a legal ruling.
8) And someone else sets up expections: the union has to fight, it has to win, and it has to win now, now, now.
9) Everyone agrees: now, now, now is the time.
10) With the expectations thus set, disappointment is almost immediate, and lasting, because the union can't even meet to set a direction, or formulate an answer. By then, everyone in the union, or near the union is on the defensive, and consumed with calling everyone "stupid" that's calling them "panzies".
Personally, I don't care if the union takes a few days. I don't care if the process start local, with a little info from the reps, letting us know they're taking a look at this. Then the MEC can meet. They can talk about with the company. They can seek to find remedies and solution without jumping in the expectations game. They can do a little soul-searching, and a little strategic planning. They can be smart.
I just would like them, once in a while, to conclude from their soul-searching that it's OK to roll the dice on a skirmish, just to make sure the troops are still alert, and reassure us the officers still have some fight in them. I don't want knee-jerk reactions, and I don't need instant reactions either. I just think deliberate planning doesn't preclude ocasionally engaging. And I think a force that's got some fight in it might get some surprising results. But we'll never know if we never try.
This seems like a subject we should battle over.
Let's see what develops.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Nice while it lasted
The NMB posts its rulings online (NMB.GOV). The latest one they've put up is from March 29. Might I suggest everyone throttle back for a week or so until we can all read what it really says?
NO NO NO. If you allow guys to come in and pick up trips in seniority order, you might as well just have one big category system wide and bid on any trip any base.... if one is a junior lineholder he will get screwed. period. Nevermind what will happen to reserves... you aren't thinking this through. There is a HUGE risk of unintended consequence here that you do not see but is all too obvious to me. Camel... nose... tent... It's just like international pilots being allowed to fly domestic trips "as long as they are published in the bid package" See where that little gem got us didn't you? It is a totally stupid idea. (sorry Satch)
Fair enough, I know the issues with just letting guys swap their stuff on the open time board, but did not think it would effect pilot to pilot swaps. Either way, I suspect that the input will be what you state.
I was not sure what it was one of the highest recommendations for the SOT though.
I'm coming to the view that ALPA's goal is to have the most pilots represented by ALPA - no matter what pilot group wants. My guess is that ALPA (National) will not want to pursue any Scope argument against RAH. Why? Because ALPA wants to bring the RAH group into ALPA. Simple - the Delta pilot group is already in ALPA (and unlikely to leave) while RAH is not.
Follow the money - it's been the best advice anyone has given me in life.
Follow the money - it's been the best advice anyone has given me in life.
Not at the cost of DALPA. A violation is a violation, and most of the MEH and F9 pilots would love to see the Republic side take a little in the shorts.
It will come down to what is legal, and contractual.
AND WHY IN THE HELL DO WE NOT WANT TO TRY? WHY?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH DALPA SAYING "THIS IS GOOD NEWS, WE'RE GOING TO STOP THIS MULTI-CERTIFICATE SCAM NOW."
Instead "well, you don't know what you're talking about because you're just a pilot and if we know anything as a pilot's union is that pilots don't know anything. So status quo and don't question our lawyers."
Funny, there is always 2 lawyers in a case, one for and against the same thing so you can't question any lawyer?
But Skywest there is your green light, go for it. We'll pay for your Airbuses. ALPA won't grieve it if you consider voting them in too.
Maybe the Teamsters would like 12,000 mainline pilots? I'm all for anything at this point. Imagine if the 2000+ pilots who signed those DPA cards, probably few signing them because they're in love with the DPA, invited another established union? Could we finally get ALPA to do it's job correctly which includes not pushing back against the pilots?
Instead "well, you don't know what you're talking about because you're just a pilot and if we know anything as a pilot's union is that pilots don't know anything. So status quo and don't question our lawyers."
Funny, there is always 2 lawyers in a case, one for and against the same thing so you can't question any lawyer?
But Skywest there is your green light, go for it. We'll pay for your Airbuses. ALPA won't grieve it if you consider voting them in too.
Maybe the Teamsters would like 12,000 mainline pilots? I'm all for anything at this point. Imagine if the 2000+ pilots who signed those DPA cards, probably few signing them because they're in love with the DPA, invited another established union? Could we finally get ALPA to do it's job correctly which includes not pushing back against the pilots?
Everyone is over at an IFALPA meeting this week and is not around. Call your reps, e-mail em, tell em what you see, read, think. Try to include a copy of the ruling. It does help.
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
How would this work? ALPA is our bargaining agent. I don't think we can side step our agent to fight a grievance on our own absent ALPA's permission to do so.
We had a good conversation. I said that this is the greatest threat to my job that I see. Scope. We provide pilot services to ac we fly....if we don't fly the plane then nothing else matters. He was just as hot as me about the issue and said that our council was starting the communication stream with other councils as we speak about this new ruling.
We all know that the proof is in the pudding and only actions speak. So I will continue to let them know this is my #1 concern and as my reps i want them to take it to the nth degree. I feel he and I agree and I will watch how it progresses.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




