Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 04-08-2011 | 01:26 PM
  #63611  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 100
Default

Heyas,

Things that make you go "hmmmm":

Why did the AirTran pilots INSIST on keeping OUTSIDE counsel for section one (scope) when they joined ALPA?

Nu
Old 04-08-2011 | 01:30 PM
  #63612  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
I am surprised (actually not really) that the Code-A-Phone made no mention of the decision or the indication that DALPA/ALPA is aware of the ruling and are "thoroughly researching this ruling to determine if there is any impact to our PWA"


You can't possibly tell me that this ruling has caught our Union off guard. The actions take by DALPA may just be what the DPA movement needs to gain momentum. (note: I have not sent in a card yet, but will be watching what comes of this closely as will many of our pilots that haven't sent in a card).
I'm not sure I would do it quite like this, and maybe Alfa has a point WRT timing. This is the classic sequence of events when something like this happens:

1) Someone on the internet reports an event and suggests an implication.
2) Someone else takes the ball and runs with it.
3) Someone with some other agenda jumps all over it to criticize the union, or the current people in the union.
4) Someone that's a close supporter of the union, or the current people in the union, jumps in for counter-insurgency and interference.
5) One of these two (above) starts calling the other one stupid.
6) Stupid follows-up with a "I know you are but what am I?"
7) Someone jumps in once again to re-driect, and offers a legal ruling.
8) And someone else sets up expections: the union has to fight, it has to win, and it has to win now, now, now.
9) Everyone agrees: now, now, now is the time.
10) With the expectations thus set, disappointment is almost immediate, and lasting, because the union can't even meet to set a direction, or formulate an answer. By then, everyone in the union, or near the union is on the defensive, and consumed with calling everyone "stupid" that's calling them "panzies".

Personally, I don't care if the union takes a few days. I don't care if the process start local, with a little info from the reps, letting us know they're taking a look at this. Then the MEC can meet. They can talk about with the company. They can seek to find remedies and solution without jumping in the expectations game. They can do a little soul-searching, and a little strategic planning. They can be smart.

I just would like them, once in a while, to conclude from their soul-searching that it's OK to roll the dice on a skirmish, just to make sure the troops are still alert, and reassure us the officers still have some fight in them. I don't want knee-jerk reactions, and I don't need instant reactions either. I just think deliberate planning doesn't preclude ocasionally engaging. And I think a force that's got some fight in it might get some surprising results. But we'll never know if we never try.

This seems like a subject we should battle over.

Let's see what develops.
Old 04-08-2011 | 02:05 PM
  #63613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Nice while it lasted
Default

The NMB posts its rulings online (NMB.GOV). The latest one they've put up is from March 29. Might I suggest everyone throttle back for a week or so until we can all read what it really says?
Old 04-08-2011 | 02:13 PM
  #63614  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
NO NO NO. If you allow guys to come in and pick up trips in seniority order, you might as well just have one big category system wide and bid on any trip any base.... if one is a junior lineholder he will get screwed. period. Nevermind what will happen to reserves... you aren't thinking this through. There is a HUGE risk of unintended consequence here that you do not see but is all too obvious to me. Camel... nose... tent... It's just like international pilots being allowed to fly domestic trips "as long as they are published in the bid package" See where that little gem got us didn't you? It is a totally stupid idea. (sorry Satch)

Fair enough, I know the issues with just letting guys swap their stuff on the open time board, but did not think it would effect pilot to pilot swaps. Either way, I suspect that the input will be what you state.

I was not sure what it was one of the highest recommendations for the SOT though.
Old 04-08-2011 | 02:18 PM
  #63615  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
I'm coming to the view that ALPA's goal is to have the most pilots represented by ALPA - no matter what pilot group wants. My guess is that ALPA (National) will not want to pursue any Scope argument against RAH. Why? Because ALPA wants to bring the RAH group into ALPA. Simple - the Delta pilot group is already in ALPA (and unlikely to leave) while RAH is not.

Follow the money - it's been the best advice anyone has given me in life.

Not at the cost of DALPA. A violation is a violation, and most of the MEH and F9 pilots would love to see the Republic side take a little in the shorts.

It will come down to what is legal, and contractual.
Old 04-08-2011 | 02:23 PM
  #63616  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
AND WHY IN THE HELL DO WE NOT WANT TO TRY? WHY?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH DALPA SAYING "THIS IS GOOD NEWS, WE'RE GOING TO STOP THIS MULTI-CERTIFICATE SCAM NOW."

Instead "well, you don't know what you're talking about because you're just a pilot and if we know anything as a pilot's union is that pilots don't know anything. So status quo and don't question our lawyers."

Funny, there is always 2 lawyers in a case, one for and against the same thing so you can't question any lawyer?

But Skywest there is your green light, go for it. We'll pay for your Airbuses. ALPA won't grieve it if you consider voting them in too.

Maybe the Teamsters would like 12,000 mainline pilots? I'm all for anything at this point. Imagine if the 2000+ pilots who signed those DPA cards, probably few signing them because they're in love with the DPA, invited another established union? Could we finally get ALPA to do it's job correctly which includes not pushing back against the pilots?
Frankly, I do not beleive anyone said they are not going to 1) Look at the ruling and its implications and 2) Fight it if there is a change in status as it pertains to our PWA.

Everyone is over at an IFALPA meeting this week and is not around. Call your reps, e-mail em, tell em what you see, read, think. Try to include a copy of the ruling. It does help.
Old 04-08-2011 | 02:24 PM
  #63617  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Heyas,

Things that make you go "hmmmm":

Why did the AirTran pilots INSIST on keeping OUTSIDE counsel for section one (scope) when they joined ALPA?

Nu
Perception.
Old 04-08-2011 | 02:30 PM
  #63618  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
How about anyone who wants to chip in $100 can do so to hire people to fight this legally? I have a feeling we would raise about $1.2 million. This could be the tipping point issue to have more people seriously consider the DPA.
How would this work? ALPA is our bargaining agent. I don't think we can side step our agent to fight a grievance on our own absent ALPA's permission to do so.
Old 04-08-2011 | 02:54 PM
  #63619  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Perception.
Or was it prudence?
Old 04-08-2011 | 03:22 PM
  #63620  
Imapilot2's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Captain Jack
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
yeah. what else did they say?

We had a good conversation. I said that this is the greatest threat to my job that I see. Scope. We provide pilot services to ac we fly....if we don't fly the plane then nothing else matters. He was just as hot as me about the issue and said that our council was starting the communication stream with other councils as we speak about this new ruling.

We all know that the proof is in the pudding and only actions speak. So I will continue to let them know this is my #1 concern and as my reps i want them to take it to the nth degree. I feel he and I agree and I will watch how it progresses.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices