Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 05-09-2011 | 07:20 AM
  #65371  
Amish Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: A330 A
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue24
Latest rumor I heard was; if a A320 base comes to ATL they will need to hire 600. Came from the CPO.


step away from the crack pipe..........
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:20 AM
  #65372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk
Maybe they meant "an A320 base was coming to ATL", AND "we are going to hire 600"!! (A man can dream can't he?)

Fly safe,

GJ
You have to ask if we do put a 320 base in ATL, what are we pulling out? There is only so much we can put in a capacity constrained airport and expect to have any kind of sked integrity. That would be great to hire more, maybe for the rest rules.
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:21 AM
  #65373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Don't forget, CAPEX, is CAPEX. The acquisition of the MD90's was only about half the expense of getting them into service. They are much larger units of capacity at a time when we are pulling down capacity.
Also need to factor in range considerations. What if the 90s are to be doing MSP-west coast flying? Big difference in capabilities aside from capacity.
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:24 AM
  #65374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk
Maybe they meant "an A320 base was coming to ATL", AND "we are going to hire 600"!! (A man can dream can't he?)

Fly safe,

GJ
That was not how it was presents, but if a good amount of pilots take the Early Out, then yes, we may hire with no base moves.

I know of at least three Whale Capt's that are in their mid 60's that are bailing.
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:35 AM
  #65375  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
You have to ask if we do put a 320 base in ATL, what are we pulling out?
RJ's for starters. Possibly some 737's to Detroit.
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:37 AM
  #65376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
You have to ask if we do put a 320 base in ATL, what are we pulling out? There is only so much we can put in a capacity constrained airport and expect to have any kind of sked integrity.
Replace 20 RJs with 20 mainline A/C. No net change on airport constraints.
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:38 AM
  #65377  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
RJ's for starters. Possibly some 737's to Detroit.
I have heard that CVG and MEM will get smaller.

I can see a 73N base in DTW.

DCI carrier ASA just put a base in DTW as well.
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:42 AM
  #65378  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
Replace 20 RJs with 20 mainline A/C. No net change on airport constraints.
Depends if you are talking a traditional RJ or a traditional mainline jet that has been outsourced. The 50 seaters use specially configured gates that are too small for anything else.

Interesting fact: The large footprint of the current generation turboprops are what kept them out of DCI despite burning half the fuel of an RJ. A Dash 8 Q 400 needs as much room as a 737-800.
Old 05-09-2011 | 07:45 AM
  #65379  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Anyone know the status on winglet mods? Seems like they have slowed almost to a halt, at least for the 757. Maybe the -ERs are getting them instead? I know there's out of service time but with fuel where it is I would think they'd want the fleet done yesterday.
Old 05-09-2011 | 08:04 AM
  #65380  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
You have to ask if we do put a 320 base in ATL, what are we pulling out? There is only so much we can put in a capacity constrained airport and expect to have any kind of sked integrity. That would be great to hire more, maybe for the rest rules.
Ice,

I'd have to agree with B-Bar on this one. I've seen 73's doing the North routes, similar in comparison to what the 319/320 used to do. (Don't know, could just be seasonal work shift.) Even Bismarck, N.D., of all places, now has a 73 operating once a day instead of an Airbus. Most of the winter is covered with only RJ's.

I'm not advocating an ATL 320 base, not in my job description to figure those puzzles out, but sure would like to see another 600 new faces on property.

Flight attendants too!!

GJ


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
RJ's for starters. Possibly some 737's to Detroit.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices