![]() |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 1033278)
Do you think the DOT would allow that without a major divestiture of NYC slots?
The benefit I see is an immediate solution to the 100 seater, and earlier slots in the 320 and 320neo lines. The 100 seater "problem" wouldn't be solved since JB is already offloading E190s. We had a JB guy somewhere around here mention the E190 is not doing as well as it should. Which sucks, looks like a great airplane. And I don't think Airbus will say "hey, sorry, no room for you on the production line..." They won't because they can't afford to do that. So really, it's just a horrible idea. |
Originally Posted by FIIGMO
(Post 1033288)
American is going to give the pilots what they want then file Ch 11. Look at their books and with this big biz controlled government they will allow it to force upon American employees what they allowed to happen at all the legacies!
If AMR goes Chapter 11, this government which is absolutely anti-business, will struggle with that mightily in an Presidential election year. They can't stop it so they'll assist it in whatever way possible to make it quick and keep it under the rug. |
Originally Posted by FIIGMO
(Post 1033285)
Taking pay now for being chumped later will come back and haunt these pilots if they vote yes.....
|
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1033144)
Not a pay windfall? I agree the terms of the SLI from SWAPA are suspect at best, but I have a feeling most of the Airtran pilots will vote for it, primarily because they will be winning the lottery monetarily. The 717 will pay more than our 764 and A330. You don't think that is a windfall? Are you related to Trump?
With that logic, SWA has X airplanes. SInce ATI will be bringing Y airplanes, the SWA FO side of the list will be getting an airframe windfall since they did not have those airframes available before the merger. How do you reconcile that? And no, not related to Trump, but I live within my means so money is not as big an issue as it is with some. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1033302)
OK.. so if SWA makes $0.01 more than ATI, the ATI guys would be getting a windfall, right? I just want to be sure where you are coming from.
With that logic, SWA has X airplanes. SInce ATI will be bringing Y airplanes, the SWA FO side of the list will be getting an airframe windfall since they did not have those airframes available before the merger. How do you reconcile that? And no, not related to Trump, but I live within my means so money is not as big an issue as it is with some. As for the "airframe" argument: that would have merit if SWA got the planes without the pilots; with this acquisition they do get the planes, but planes that are already pre-staffed with pilots to go with them. No "windfall" there. The ATI pilots get a large pay increase just for doing the exact same thing they were doing before. SWA pilots don't. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 1033278)
Do you think the DOT would allow that without a major divestiture of NYC slots?
The benefit I see is an immediate solution to the 100 seater, and earlier slots in the 320 and 320neo lines. |
Originally Posted by FIIGMO
(Post 1033285)
Taking pay now for being chumped later will come back and haunt these pilots if they vote yes.....
What is amazing to me is the number of guys that are promoting this exact thing. I wish them well. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Herkflyr
(Post 1033310)
Uh...I think you know that your logic is beyond suspect. The ATI pilots will be getting a $50K+ a year pay increase, if not more, from what I can tell. Even hinting that somehow compares to a "one cent" raise is like saying there is no difference between McDonald's and a kid's lemonade stand. After all they both make money selling food and drink, do they not? Disclaimer: I'm not equating the ATI pilots with the lemonade stand, just the silly $.01 analogy
As for the "airframe" argument: that would have merit if SWA got the planes without the pilots; with this acquisition they do get the planes, but planes that are already pre-staffed with pilots to go with them. No "windfall" there. The ATI pilots get a large pay increase just for doing the exact same thing they were doing before. SWA pilots don't. The first one. Gotcha. Kind of like that old joke. You go up to a woman and ask her if she would sleep with you for $1 million dollars, and she says.. "Uh, OK" Then you say to her "How about $50?" and she says "What do you think I am a prostitute?" The response from you at that point is "Why, yes, we have already established that and now all we are doing is negotiating the price." So if $0.01 is a silly analogy and is NOT a windfall, what dollar figure do you have in mind that would make it a windfall? Take your time. Look, I really don't care how this all pans out, it doesn't affect me one way or the other except that I might wind up training the FOs that realize they won't upgrade in their natural lifetimes and come over to DAL to fly the ER, but I am amazed that once again it comes back to money with you guys. Truly a sad thing IMHO. |
What the hell was THAT?
|
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 1033278)
Do you think the DOT would allow that without a major divestiture of NYC slots?
The benefit I see is an immediate solution to the 100 seater, and earlier slots in the 320 and 320neo lines. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands