![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1039660)
I can tell you that the pilot that wrote this is a guy that will call balls and strikes fairly. He is super smart, and took a ton of time writing that piece. Plus, he is far from senior, and is one of the smartest guys I know. He gave an honest answer after pouring over all of the data.
It appears to me that AS gets 5X's the good deal that we get from them (on the pilot's backs). I also get tired of hearing how they feed our international flights. Let's see how many narrow body pilots we would add if we really made this codeshare fair. I'm sure W2 $$ would far exceed the number of widebody jobs benefiting from AS feed. Delta employs narrowbody pilots too you know! |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1039660)
I can tell you that the pilot that wrote this is a guy that will call balls and strikes fairly. He is super smart, and took a ton of time writing that piece. Plus, he is far from senior, and is one of the smartest guys I know. He gave an honest answer after pouring over all of the data.
That still doesn't change the fundamental issue. Cheers George |
Originally Posted by Jesse
(Post 1039456)
That and a war on poverty that we are losing each and every year at the cost of trillions upon trillions since we transformed into a nanny-state.
|
Recently, I flew with a senior CA, and i asked what was his primary concern in our next contract. He said pay, I said scope. It's as simple as that. He's senior, I'm junior. Our perspectives are different. I totally understand that from a guy in his mid 50s.
What the AS piece is just one pilot's objective view on the subject. From mgmt's point of view, it sounds like a good strategic move, but from a junior DL pilot's view, it's a sour lemon. To me, all these JV ventures are starting to become Boeing's, sub-contracting everything out to the lowest bidder or outside help, and DL is merely a brand that passengers recognize with. And we've all seen how well that is working out for Boeing? |
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 1039520)
The latest ALPA letter about the Alaska codeshare leaves out a huge point IMHO, while we may not compete directly on routes we're also not growing our business and flying organically because Alaska is allowed to do all that growth. With that thought process why shouldn't we just let every other company do our flying for us while we stay stagnant and or shrink the pilot list. Why don't they show how our pilot lists have shrunk as a whole hike others are getting bet gains in positions.
|
Originally Posted by rvr350
(Post 1039720)
Recently, I flew with a senior CA, and i asked what was his primary concern in our next contract. He said pay, I said scope. It's as simple as that. He's senior, I'm junior. Our perspectives are different. I totally understand that from a guy in his mid 50s.
What the AS piece is just one pilot's objective view on the subject. From mgmt's point of view, it sounds like a good strategic move, but from a junior DL pilot's view, it's a sour lemon. To me, all these JV ventures are starting to become Boeing's, sub-contracting everything out to the lowest bidder or outside help, and DL is merely a brand that passengers recognize with. And we've all seen how well that is working out for Boeing? |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1039697)
I agree, he is a great guy.
That still doesn't change the fundamental issue. Cheers George But I want to see numbers of flights not seat numbers. It's the 767 vs A380 argument whereas we'd all rather DAL fly 2 767s while AF flies 1 A380 and it's called even because the seats equal. If we're talking 777s out of LAX then that's over twice the size of a 737-700. Every 777 would be 2 737s. I get that 738s and 739s will equal our 75s and 73s, but 20 767 flights equals 26.8 AS 738 flights to make seats equal. Now I'm not even going to guess what the numbers would be but it'd be nice to see them just to see what kind of balance there is or isn't. http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...-tomorrow.html Notice they're growing out of SEA, a non DAL hub? |
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1039403)
Bingo-if you enlist and spend 5-10 years defending the country (usually the guys/gals on the pointy end of the spear), and get out to go to school, get a job, etc, you get squat. I think the problem they are seeing is with the cliff vesting. IMO, giving some sort of 401K contribution for service in the early "war fighting years" is appropriate. Look at the typical age of the kids killed in the war these days. They're junior and generally in their 20s.
|
I heard that idea of ending congress pensions and I love it.
Somebody had numbers once on how many of congressman are millionaires and how many left congress millionaires who made their money while in congress. |
When I start my DC-8 airline, the boarding music will change in cruise to the sound of a DC-7. Just a constant rumble of propellers.
http://airodyssey.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=200&h=100 |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands