![]() |
Kids.........:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1073977)
I was based there up till this past March. I commuted out of there last week and was left speechless when I saw that all of the departures fit on TWO monitors. Two. And there were about twelve monitors. Very sad. I looked into flights to ATL from Lexington and Louisville because the flight options to CVG were so bad.
I heard a big rumor about CVG from an airport employee (not a DAL employee). Apparently someone is renovating some old gates there. They believe it is SWA. Anyone else here the same? Actually I think SWA might go into there. They are quickly running out of places to grow, yet they need to grow. They have had CVG surrounded for many years, but were too afraid of DL's zealously defended fortress hub. Now that that's over, they will likely go in like they did with PIT. Probably with massive favors from the airport and local governments. CVG will still have a lot of DL flights. Always and forever more than SWA has the ability to add. If/when SWA comes to CVG, they will fly to their hubs and to a few other select markets and that's it. The key question will be, will DL compete or give it up? I think DL can compete, as we will see in ATL (and many other markets) as SWA's golden years of picking where they want to dominate and then dominating are over. DL needs to be able and willing to ruthlessly compete with so called "LCC's" in every market, no exceptions. Retreating from markets on a case by case basis as competitors snipe market share on their terms by seat dumping and trashing yields one city pair at a time makes sense quarter by quarter but its not a long term sustainable business plan. Its time to do to SWA what SWA has done to everyone else. Win customers and make the other guy bleed til he retreats. |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1073984)
Oh, everybody should go to the bus....especially if you're LA-based!! Don't, under any circumstances, come to LA and fly the 73. Go east young men!;)
|
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1074001)
Also, another rumor floating around the training center is that we are merging with Hawaiian.
Am I wrong to think the HI merger would be a better deal than a domestic lower 48 merger? |
Anyone want to guess on how many pilots complete the survey by noon tomorrow?
My guess, 7823. |
Hi FTB,
Dear Lord, I sincerely hope you are WAAAAY off base. At the MEM road-show last week, T.O. (or one of the other guys) indicated that it was something in the 6K range of guys who'd responded to date. If that's the best we get in the way of survey returns, man, are we ever going to get @#!$%-slapped on C2012. You'll have a hard time ever finding a guy who would admit to NOT filling out the survey. If 7K pilots is all we get interested in the process, I don't even want to contemplate what our next contract will look like. Chuck |
Originally Posted by chuck416
(Post 1074038)
Hi FTB,
Dear Lord, I sincerely hope you are WAAAAY off base. At the MEM road-show last week, T.O. (or one of the other guys) indicated that it was something in the 6K range of guys who'd responded to date. If that's the best we get in the way of survey returns, man, are we ever going to get @#!$%-slapped on C2012. You'll have a hard time ever finding a guy who would admit to NOT filling out the survey. If 7K pilots is all we get interested in the process, I don't even want to contemplate what our next contract will look like. Chuck But that's my pessimistic bet. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1074023)
Anyone want to guess on how many pilots complete the survey by noon tomorrow?
My guess, 7823. |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1074001)
Also, another rumor floating around the training center is that we are merging with Hawaiian.
Take that SWA.;) |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1074020)
How dare you talk to our Alaska partners like that.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:40 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands