![]() |
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1080713)
I'm with you, about being responsible in some way as a dues-paying union member to pay off this costly lawsuit. Since when did I become responsible for all of ALPA's mistakes. I try to keep a level head without jumping to conclusions, but having to take our dues and use them to pay for this lawsuit is beyond my boiling point.
As far as DPA is concerned, I think each and every in-house labor union self defines themselves as a group. The APA group is very different from the USAPA or SWAPA, I'm not saying it will be a walk in the park, but I'm willing to hear the case presented to us. If we can keep a clean simplified balance sheet with very direct, clear communication, then I don't see any reason to fear a transition to DPA. I'm not saying necessarily that I would vote for DPA at this point in time, but I would like to hear more information about it while being open to a vote in the near future. (Preferably after DALPA's opener is made public to the pilot group) Now Carl.....Where can I find an authorization card? Carl |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1080729)
Hey Carl, I couldn't care less about what he is touting about the SWAPA contract. The bug under my blanket about guys like him is that he wants us to get a better contract so that they can benefit without ever having to do squat themselves. They are the worst kind of parasite. SWAPA has done nothing to better this industry... nothing.
Carl |
Originally Posted by jabwmu
(Post 1080718)
Reserve question:
While on short call how do the groupings work? I know anything more than 4 days you are grouped with others with 4 days or more. According to the contract it is suppose to go by Raw score, then inverse seniority when the score is the same within the same grouping. If I have 6 days available (and senior) and someone else has 8 days available (and junior), and we both have a score of 0, who would get the trip (say a 4 day trip)? Does having more than 4 days available come in to play at all? Thanks. Then its RAW score. After that it's completely up to the scheduler... They may look ahead and based reserve availability on days 5-9 pick one or the other. Your only form of affecting the outcome is filling out your "if needed to fly" preferences, but those are no binding and typically will only come into play if there are two trips to assign... Cheers George |
|
US Embassy warns about possible attack on Nigeria hotels
The U.S. Embassy warns that three luxury hotels in Nigeria's oil-rich capital, Abuja, may be the next target of a radical Muslim sect responsible for this week's attacks that have killed 100, papers including Nigeria's Daily Times and the Washington Post report. The sect known locally as Boko Haram may target Abuja's Hilton, Sheraton and Nicon Luxury hotels, where diplomats, politicians and prominent business people - both from Nigeria and abroad - often meet. The U.S. Embassy's warning is a reminder that hotels - especially Western hotels where foreigners typically meet - remain a soft target around the world. The Post calls the warning "unusually specific." According to the Post, the embassy says "the attack may come as Nigeria celebrates the Muslim holiday Eid al-Adha and that its diplomats and staff had been instructed to avoid those hotels." More fun for the malaria jet crews. |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1080761)
4-day bucket = 4-day bucket.
Then its RAW score. After that it's completely up to the scheduler... They may look ahead and based reserve availability on days 5-9 pick one or the other. Your only form of affecting the outcome is filling out your "if needed to fly" preferences, but those are no binding and typically will only come into play if there are two trips to assign... Cheers George There is a 5+ day bucket, a 4 day, 3 day, 2 day and a 1 day bucket. The 5+ day bucket is the one that we are looking at. If they opted for this bucket to cover the trip: With both RAW's being equal and no one having a yellow in, the junior guy goes above the senior one. If the senior guy has a yellow and the raws are equal he goes first. Also if one is on SC and the trip is assigned after SC has been assigned for the following day they can go to the next available pilot. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1080745)
Here's the problem deadhead, DALPA's opener will NOT be made public to this pilot group. Not even a summary. That was precisely stated by the council 20 LEC chairman. You won't know how bad the opener was until you see the TA for you to vote on. And that will be far too late because even with a NO vote and total solidarity, you'll never do better than the opening position. If that opener was horribly weak, then horribly weak is the best you can do...even if you vote in DPA.
Carl This opener is our DALPA opener. I expect it to be nothing less than industry leading....will it be c2k + 293.64% sure? but my reality says it most likely will not be. And if it is a BS contract, well then another party will represent this group next contract, be it DPA or the Carl Fraternal Order of Pro Pilots.. Right now, no group in my opinion, can step in with time remaining to have anything but a detrimental affect. Not the way I want to go forward but reality is just that reality and we have to go forward with what we have. So I am doing what I can to be sure our opener is nothing less than industry leading plus plus. My card is already signed, and will be voted on after are next contract. Will it be a yes or no vote totally depends on DALPA! |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1080712)
Dear alfaromeo,
I have a question for you now that I've answered all of yours: What are your thoughts of our ALPA lawyers given the following FACTS?: Carl ALPA's lawyers are like most lawyers you find outside of your television set. They do what their clients hire them to do. Same logic you use to defend Seeham's cases that haven't panned out. The problem was, and is, ALPA's own decision making and intransigence. (Same problem at US Air) Here's where the DPA could actually do some good, if it wanted. The DPA has the numbers to probably recall everybody in the MEC and clean sweep the Admin. The DPA could act to change the policies it deems wrong. The DPA has not acted to change policy. They have instead decided to attack the institution ... which suggests to me the DPA is mostly OK with ALPA's policies and practice. Bottom line ... the DPA has not shown us a better way forward. |
Thanks for the replies and insight georgetg and acl65pilot.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1080781)
Carl,
ALPA's lawyers are like most lawyers you find outside of your television set. They do what their clients hire them to do. Same logic you use to defend Seeham's cases that haven't panned out. The problem was, and is, ALPA's own decision making and intransigence. (Same problem at US Air) Here's where the DPA could actually do some good, if it wanted. The DPA has the numbers to probably recall everybody in the MEC and clean sweep the Admin. The DPA could act to change the policies it deems wrong. The DPA has not acted to change policy. They have instead decided to attack the institution ... which suggests to me the DPA is mostly OK with ALPA's policies and practice. Bottom line ... the DPA has not shown us a better way forward. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:44 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands