Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2011 | 05:47 AM
  #74411  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chuck416
If this were you (holding the bang-stick), you'd probably be thinking something along the lines of "this is going to hurt you a lot more than it's going to hurt me". Have you ever seen what a 12 gauge shotgun shell does to an animal, when discharged underwater. This guy is about to, literally, tear that fish into two dead, quivering pieces. Not pretty to watch, unless you hate sharks...
And then you see Momma great white just outside of the frame wondering what just happened to junior.
Old 08-27-2011 | 05:51 AM
  #74412  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Why would we negotiate a concessionary contract when Delta is profitable? Ain't happening. Not buying it. If Delta is making money now, they're in a position to make LOADS when the economy comes back to full swing. To think otherwise is foolish. Management will have ZERO to base the need for a concessionary contract on, because not only are we making money but also paying off debt at an impressive rate while giving money to Aeromexico and BUYING 100 737-900ERs.

Your point may have gone right over my head, but I truly believe that our current NC will not even present a TA that has any scope relief. PERIOD.
Could be wrong, but I think Bar was referring to negotiations with the manufacturer during tough economic times and having leverage.
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:02 AM
  #74413  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Why would we negotiate a concessionary contract when Delta is profitable? Ain't happening. Not buying it. If Delta is making money now, they're in a position to make LOADS when the economy comes back to full swing. To think otherwise is foolish. Management will have ZERO to base the need for a concessionary contract on, because not only are we making money but also paying off debt at an impressive rate while giving money to Aeromexico and BUYING 100 737-900ERs.

Your point may have gone right over my head, but I truly believe that our current NC will not even present a TA that has any scope relief. PERIOD.
Bar still believes strongly in a double dip recession, thus still thinking the company is going to come asking for concessions. Any surprise?
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:11 AM
  #74414  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Embraer Snaps 3-Day Advance as Delta Said to Postpone Orders - Bloomberg

" Embraer SA (EMBR3), the world’s fourth- largest planemaker, fell for the first day in four after Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) deferred an order of 100 small narrow-body jets until 2012.
"

Found that line somewhat interesting. At a glance I think this is a a good thing. Seems like the majority of big aircraft purchase orders over the last few years have been for ERJs and CRJs, so it's nice to see some Boeing metal on firm orders while RJ orders are delayed.

Manufacturer aside, delaying 100 seat aircraft orders until after the 2012 contract makes sense from management's standpoint, but scares me from a pilot's standpoint. I slowly see scope becoming a major issue in this next contract, seems as the the battlefield is being laid out as such.

Personally, anything proposal with a scope sale attached to it is a big no vote from me, but I'm sure there are those that think 100 seat flying is beneath them and not worth substantial contract improvements for the short term.

My one question is, how essential are 100 seat aircraft to the future of DAL's network coverage? Can DAL sustain it's capacity efficiently with 70 seaters bridging the gap to mainline 150 seaters? or will this leave a major efficiency gap in our system?

I welcome someone else's interpretation of the Tea Leaves, with a healthy smattering of some classy sideboob shots.
While the timing of the announcement seems to line up with upcoming Sec 6, I don't think the two are related. I just think DAL has not found an acceptable product. RA has been consistently saying that in order to get the full value of an aircraft you need to OWN it for 30 years. The E190 is not a good product. JB stopped taking delivery of them, Catcus has a small amount, & RAH has a small amount too. The C-Series is a paper airplane, & I don't think we want to commit to it without knowing we can get 25-30 years out of it.

Keep in mind our A319's are pretty young, as are a good amount of our A320's. They aren't replacing all of our 320's with the -900ER, just some older ones. Our A319's are configured to 126 seats.

I also feel our NC will not even bring a TA to MEMRAT that has scope relief in it. As a matter of fact, I think we need to worry about Code Share/JV language just as much as seat/weight limitations. It's crucial that we all take the contract survey(available soon) and pound our Reps with priorities. NO MORE SCOPE RELIEF!!!!
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:14 AM
  #74415  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Sailingfun had a good post on this airplane order. He basically stated the 737-900ER fills in for some 757's as they retire.

Delta wants a 140 seat airplane, which is larger than the E190 and the C Series.

Now my opinion:

Delta apparently wants to replace the MD88 with an airplane of similar capacity. That leaves an enormous capacity gap between 76 and 142/160 seats. IMHO the company is waiting out a worse downturn which might give them the opportunity to close the 100 seat order during concessionary negotiations. The Company is biding their time until attrition picks up and the scope loss would not be felt by those currently on our list.
Originally Posted by Columbia
Could be wrong, but I think Bar was referring to negotiations with the manufacturer during tough economic times and having leverage.
That's possible, but check out what I highlighted in red.
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:15 AM
  #74416  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Bar still believes strongly in a double dip recession, thus still thinking the company is going to come asking for concessions. Any surprise?

Actually, if you look at the 5 year S&P, Bar is not alone.

S&P 500 INDEX,RTH Index Chart - Yahoo! Finance

About a year ago, we had the start of a second dip, but due to QE2, it was delayed. We are in a dip right now and if the S&P support level of 1110 doesnt hold (which it has) we will definitely have a second (solid) dip. The reality of us entering a Japan style 20 year market malaise is quite real.
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:18 AM
  #74417  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
We used to use "north" acars at my previous company, but this thing seems to have had Delta IT's hands all over it. It seems to vary by a minute or 2 after it's made its way through all the tubes and hamster wheels to iCrew from the standard brake/door methodology we are used to for some unexplained reason.
Heyas Clamp,

Different service provider. NWA used one, DAL used the other.

Nu
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:20 AM
  #74418  
Rhino Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: 73N CA
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
I wonder if an out time would be generated when the tug driver moves the AC just a little bit to free a frozen chock? That happens a lot
The out time is generated as soon as the brake is released and the forward boarding door is closed.
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:31 AM
  #74419  
Rhino Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: 73N CA
Default

Actually, it might be all doors closed. The cargo doors can be opened after the out time is generated, but they might have to be initially closed to generate the out time. On arrival, it's the LAST BRAKE set before the FWD boarding door is opened.
Old 08-27-2011 | 06:43 AM
  #74420  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
I'll toss out some bait:

Alpa is great! Absolutely fixable by working within the constitution and bylaws.

Our section 1 is ironclad, written by the best lawyers ever, defended to the hilt.

We should take a paycut to help our company payoff its RJ leases.

Carl?
You know what, PG is missing too.

Maybe Carl and PG are somewhere, together? Maybe riding motorcycles?

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices