Tomcat |
05-23-2009 11:42 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 615988)
You know your pilot group better than I do, but for whatever it's worth, that is NOT the opinion of senior NWA pilots. There's not a single one of us that doesn't consider Scope the number one issue. I've said this before: Scope is Section 1 of every ALPA contract for a reason.
I think the junior DAL pilots need to understand this. If you thought you were in the minority before the merger, you now have 5,000 pilots who agree with you completely. I don't know if that will tip the balance, but it couldn't hurt.
Carl
|
I tell you Carl, it can be quite exhausting at times. More and more junior captains I fly with get it, but at the same time many have the opinion that the give away of scope is a almost a "cultural" issue with our union and pilot group at Delta. It's almost as if, "that's the way it's always been, so that's the way it will always be, there nothing we can do about it". Arghh!!! Guys just roll over. Maybe this from years of burnout from feeling that our union is turning a deaf ear to us.
I spoke with 4 different Compass pilots last week while riding on the van. Seem like a good group of guys and the guys I spoke with want to stay under our MEC and every one of them said they want to be on our list. "Stapled" was a term that two of them used. Now, some could say that Compass was a Scope concession, but it I believe it may also be mitigating some furloughs. At least you guys kept management from making it a 100 seat company, as I have been told was their original proposal (please correct me if I'm wrong). So at least you guys showed some backbone on this. Here's my question:
If we are going to give the company say 300-500 early outs, why not ask them to bring the Compass pilots and the EMB-175 on our property in exchange for the early outs? What would be the downside to us? The upside for the company would be getting control over the quality of their product, which they have not had for years and the early retirements and cost savings associated with this. The company foregoes expensive training by having the early outs, we get this aircraft on the property and the company has pilots that are already type rated on the EMB 170-195 family. I know there would be many details to hammer out, but why could this not be a practical solution that we tell the MEC to research?
I've found that you can take 100 people and put them in a room, 98 will tell you why you can't do something and 2 will find a way to make it happen. I'm looking for those two people to help find a win-win for us and the company.
Any thoughts? Fire away!!!!!!
|