Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

forgot to bid 09-06-2011 06:57 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1050427)
From the what I can tell, it is not that people are "thrilled" to work that amount of time. It comes down to a 42% pay cut and the simple fact that they got to pay the bills. To add insult to injury most now have kids in college to add to that pay cut. Yep, it's ugly.

I think everyone would like work rules that would allow the pay they want with the time off they want.

Also, most of the "young'uns of which you refer to have been doing this gig for over 15 years. We are agree with ya.

I wonder, how about just FedEx rates with caps on flying but better credit rules and increase reserve min to 75.

FedEx narrowbody pay nearly equals SWA pay but of course they also have WB pay scales. They're not restoration but make it up in credit, take it from 5.15 to 6.30 but cap the flying. Just throwing that out, I'm not going to run the macroeconomics spreadsheet on it but when it comes to the staffing formula screw with the credit and cap until you achieve no loss staffing.

Also, the trip parking. Any correlation to the MD's off the 777 which is the type of category likely to be playing the trip parking game?


Originally Posted by contrails (Post 1050387)
Incorrect.

Ask any SWA pilot what a typical monthly schedule looks like without sick time or vacation or any leave of absence.

From the conversations I've had on PM with SWA pilots I have to agree with contrails.

The $25K in one month salary I mentioned before again was this: "16 days reserve, about 86 hours flown, no vacation or silly business, over $25,000 flight pay only (not including 401k, profit sharing, blah blah blah.)"

For the math challenged like me, $25K/mo is $300K in a year. Above the average quoted to the FL pilots.

finis72 09-06-2011 07:30 PM

No correlation between MD's on the777 and trip parking. It is almost impossible to fill up because our trips are such high time that they all put you over the max.only way is to white slip and hope something comes up that fits. We just have too many pilots !

scambo1 09-06-2011 07:38 PM


Originally Posted by Wingnutdal (Post 1050212)
I believe the average SW pilot works on average more than 80 hours a month. I would say 85 would be more accurate. That includes reserves. This has been said, and bears repeating, that the $230,000 is an average. They are able to pick up to the max of 100 hours a month, and a lot do. Not all, probably not a majority, but a lot.

They have 15 days off on reserve, but there is no long call. It's all short call, and they don't get credit for the days they don't get used. But here's the thing, if a guy is on reserve 15 days, he flies 15 days. If he's on reserve 16 days, he flies 16 days.

They get incredible productivity out of their pilots.

And believe this, if DALPA went to the company and said let's get rid of ALV, it would be done tomorrow. And my happy butt and at least 1,000 of my fellow pilots would be on the street.

You need to adjust the number of hours by at least 85 to make it a reasonable comparison, and probably more.

Now having said that, I still want a fat raise.


Excuse me if someone has already corrected you.

The reason they get productivity out of their pilots and the pilots get productivity out of their trips is 6.5 TFP/day.

What does ALV have to do with a guarateed furlough? I can't connect that logic.

Their trips have credit time built in just like some of our trips have credit time.

The "incredible" productivity isn't that "incredible". Their company runs efficiently. Productivity is a byproduct.

scambo1 09-06-2011 07:54 PM


Originally Posted by finis72 (Post 1050490)
No correlation between MD's on the777 and trip parking. It is almost impossible to fill up because our trips are such high time that they all put you over the max.only way is to white slip and hope something comes up that fits. We just have too many pilots !


Finis;

Your statement contradicted itself.

Trip parking is what enables guys to exceed the pickup limit.

How can you whiteslip and hope something fits if all your trips are too high time.

My reality: Trip parking has enabled lineholders to regularly exceed 90 and 100 hours/month. This has resulted in lower reserve utilization which has resulted in beancounters counting 15 extra beans in each ATL 777 seat.:confused:

80ktsClamp 09-06-2011 08:32 PM

This is for Bar:

http://verydemotivational.files.word...ems-legit5.jpg

acl65pilot 09-07-2011 03:53 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1050502)
Finis;

Your statement contradicted itself.

Trip parking is what enables guys to exceed the pickup limit.

How can you whiteslip and hope something fits if all your trips are too high time.

My reality: Trip parking has enabled lineholders to regularly exceed 90 and 100 hours/month. This has resulted in lower reserve utilization which has resulted in beancounters counting 15 extra beans in each ATL 777 seat.:confused:

I agree, I think trip parking has a lot to do with it, but as they say, that is currently allowed, and it works for them........

sailingfun 09-07-2011 04:04 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1050502)
Finis;

Your statement contradicted itself.

Trip parking is what enables guys to exceed the pickup limit.

How can you whiteslip and hope something fits if all your trips are too high time.

My reality: Trip parking has enabled lineholders to regularly exceed 90 and 100 hours/month. This has resulted in lower reserve utilization which has resulted in beancounters counting 15 extra beans in each ATL 777 seat.:confused:

While I totally disagree with trip parking and think DALPA should step in to attempt to ban the practice I don't think its the biggest issue on the 777. They are getting by with fewer reserves because many reserves yellow high the long trips waiving their days off. This eliminates the need for the company to carry extra reserves to cover long blocks. I have no problem with a reserve doing this. Its the intent of the contract that they are allowed this option. Its not the intent of the contract for a regular line holder to park trips and that practice can take money out of other pilots pockets.

tsquare 09-07-2011 04:46 AM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 1050383)

I want to work less or about the same and make more. THere is a way we can achieve that, I know it.

TEN

PS. How many hard hours does a SWA 737 Capt. fly to make 300k?
How many hard hour does a SWA 737 Fo fly to make 180K?

Not trying to be mean, so I apologize if it came out that way. Your first sentence hit on what I was trying to say. You are used to a level of work. If it is 75.. 85... 90 hours a month, that has become comfortable for you. When the hourly rate goes up, I am willing to bet that that first month, you will NOT say.. 'hey, I am making 25% more, so I will work 25% less and make the same money..' but rather, you will bid the same line you did before, and when that bigger check comes in you will be more like 'wow.. look how much more I am making NOW' Then you are hooked. That will be the vast majority of guys out there. It is human nature.

SWA's compensation is too complicated for me to comment on. I really don't know how hard they really work for their money. If some of the rumors are true, they have a lot of credit time, so I don't know that they really work all that hard.. But I don't know, and I really don't care about them to an extent.

tsquare 09-07-2011 04:53 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1050568)
While I totally disagree with trip parking and think DALPA should step in to attempt to ban the practice I don't think its the biggest issue on the 777. They are getting by with fewer reserves because many reserves yellow high the long trips waiving their days off. This eliminates the need for the company to carry extra reserves to cover long blocks. I have no problem with a reserve doing this. Its the intent of the contract that they are allowed this option. Its not the intent of the contract for a regular line holder to park trips and that practice can take money out of other pilots pockets.


THis, and the fact that they are manning the (767ER-A category) reserves out of ATL. Look at reserve availability if you don't believe it. WE have not had more than 5 days all summer where available exceeded required in NY. Last time I looked, in Sept we had 6. ATL had 6 that DIDN'T exceed required. I'm fine with this, but if they want to man the airline this way, then drop/swap allowances need to be based on SYSTEM WIDE required/available rather than base specific... It needs to be part of the mythical manning formula. That and trip parking needs to be illegal.

forgot to bid 09-07-2011 05:02 AM

If you have the first 12 or 15 days off for the month on a WB international category and you're at 78 hours with an ALV+15 of 89, you're very limited. You're stuck at 78 hours of pay.

For an FO thats about $140K a year, less than a MD88 A.

You trip park you could pick up a 30 hour trip and get a 108 hour line and you could make $60K more a year doing that. There is incredible incentive to trip park.

If it happens 35 times or so in a month then you've eliminated 15 pilots in a seat.

I can understand the frustration with pay, being that your average 765, 744, 777 FO has been here 17-20 years it'd be frustrating. I get it.

But 15 pilots are being displaced and I got a feeling trip parking has something to do with it but I'll concede that other factors as Sailing pointed out that might be in play in addition to trip parking.

But the proof would be if trip parking was made illegal, if staffing immediately increases on the international side then you know...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands