![]() |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1063478)
Why not? Let's say you quit, then get hired at United. (Not a suggestion because you are senior to me. :) ) Then you win as MEC Chairman at UAL and have like-minded councils over there. Could National be fixed if you or Carl became President of National ALPA?
Good question. I believe it is a people issue not a structure issue. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1063472)
I just finished taking a cursory look at their website, and I didn't really see anything that describes how their method works. I am mildly interested, but I'm not about to sign up for a program I know nothing about.
And just to be clear, I'm not trying to sell you or anyone on this. Just take more than a cursory look at their web site if you're really interested. There's a lot of stuff on there. Hope that helps. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1063396)
If National negotiated not just signed your contract, you may have a point.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1063396)
Frankly, all of the ALPA services are bought by our dues dollars, and at a cheaper price than we would do as a stand a lone association.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1063396)
When they are working for us, they work for our goals, not some other groups.
Carl |
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1063398)
And he also says in the same article he is a believer in ALPA and it is our best hope for improving our careers.
I have called him about some contractual problems and had a long ranging discussion about various issues. He acknowledges DALPA has issues that he views as needing fixing, but is a very pro-MEC, pro-ALPA. Loyal opposition is the best description I can think of. Carl |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1063407)
I see that as eyewash.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1063481)
We can't negotiate Section 1 without going through a complex process of discussions with our regional competitors and the ALPA president. I know you know that. I just don't know why you keep ignoring that just because it suits you.
BS. You don't know that at all. Totally made up dude. Wow! Unbelievable! Do you mean like the way ALPA legal worked for their members at TWA? Carl You had an airline on the verge of CH7 that was bought by AMR. Fact, and that reality came in to play. There are limits to everything. Is ALPA without fault? Not on your life. I too have issues with a lot of things, but the reality is that all of them can be fixed if people are willing. To date they are not. DPA will have issues, and one or two contracts down the road, people are going to want to give them the boot for the same reasons people are listing against ALPA today. DPA's response will be to get involved. The root of all that is unjust and evil is apathy of the group. |
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 1063408)
Somehow I doubt that - you'll probably quickly join the ranks of those who say DPA is not representing your interests :eek:
According to the communications committee page, 19 LEC originated resolutions were acted on at the last MEC meeting. Sounds like they are listening and acting. Perhaps you should read what the MEC puts out instead of basing your views on here and the WB's Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1063484)
No, you're just showing that you've been brainwashed.
Carl If anything within the CB&L needs to be changed, it would be voting for our leaders, with recall of National Officers left to the BOD and the MEC Admin left to the MEC. I also would like all issues of structure and policy left up to the BOD not the Executive Board. We could leave it there, but only if these voting officers were elected by popular vote. I am willing to back up your resolution for that. You willing to submit it? |
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 1063424)
How do you expect anyone to have any faith in DPA's ability to do anything if they haven't even tried to work within the system to change their ALPA?
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 1063424)
I don't buy the it's unfixable crap. 3500+ pilots and you can't even write a resolution or recall a rep whose position you don't like?
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 1063424)
Hint - there is a lot more to running a union than licking a stamp, hitting enter, and saying you've done your part.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1063482)
Again, this has nothing to do with the actual facts written by Massey. Those facts clearly show to me that we have an MEC professional bureaucracy interested in consolidating their power and further marginalizing locals reps and line pilots.
Carl I also believe that this MEC is keeping the Admin honest. I the issue was forced upon the reps, they could change some people within the Admin. Realize that they are all focusing on Section 6. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands