![]() |
Originally Posted by Reroute
(Post 1071361)
Sounds great, however, the APA has been willing to walk off the job for the last 5 years, why haven't they? Why haven't they achieved a contract in those 5 years? What would you recommend we do differently so that we don't fall into the same trap and are stuck still negotiating this Section 6 contract in 2018 without a release for self help from the NMB?
Serious questions, I'd like to hear your ideas on how we expeditiously move through mediation. |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1071542)
I have heard that management believes round 2 of consolidation is on the way, and they do NOT want to be negotiating anything during that tome period, hence the rumor about 25% raise with a 2 year contract extension. Knowing that is possible, you would think DALPA would consider that LEVERAGE, right? Or, could DALPA maybe know the target, and maybe they aren't current ALPA members, which could mean more money via dues for them? All valid questions.
Just 25% pay and nothing else...nah. Let's just get the clock started with the NMB in that case. 25% in 2 years (including a separate 5% or so at the start of year 2 for COLA) plus significant scope recapture at the DCI, Alaska and JV levels plus other things we need for QOL in the near term would be far better than XX% 5 years from now with little other improvements and the same or even more career trashing outsourcing. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1071565)
So with this particular rumor, how massive is the scope recapture and work rule restoration, buffs in retirement and vacation, positive sick leave reform and year two COLA does this rumored proposal contain?
Just 25% pay and nothing else...nah. Let's just get the clock started with the NMB in that case. 25% in 2 years (including a separate 5% or so at the start of year 2 for COLA) plus significant scope recapture at the DCI, Alaska and JV levels plus other things we need for QOL in the near term would be far better than XX% 5 years from now with little other improvements and the same or even more career trashing outsourcing. |
Boulwarism?
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1071451)
Given this, I propose a really short negotiations whereby we just get to the end game. Our opening position is also our closing position. Not because we are stubborn or unwilling to negotiate in good faith, but because time is of the essence. The NMB would understand and be quite sympathetic in my opinion given what we've "given."
That might save time, but I believe the NLRB held that making one "take it or leave it" offer and refusing to budge constitutes an unfair labor practice. It was a case in the '60s where General Electric allegedly did this, and I assume the ruling means that unions can't do it either. Boulwarism: Ideas Have Consequences | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1071483)
Not showing a summary of our opener is like showing our cards in poker? That is bullcrap and an invalid comparison.
Showing the contract survey results would certainly be... but we deserve to know what ALPA is asking on our behalf. As usual, I am dissapointed but not surprised. Absolutely. There is no comparison to poker to be made. The cards come by chance, whereas the survey results are very deliberately put together after (hopefully) thousands of hours of work by the Delta pilots. To me, ALPA is overusing these analogies and hoping we won't think about it too hard. I may be a little suspicious, but let's say we were given a summary of the results now. And let's say they don't match up to many of our expectations. We would likely attribute this to the legalese in the survey and DPA would get a big push. This could happen in time to change unions before openers. Now let's say they don't tell us the survey results now. The company will be able to deduce them from the opener. In fact, I doubt the company cares that much about the results of the survey. They care about where we will start and how much we can be talked down. If we don't know the survey results, we might not get angry enough to get DPA the cards they need. And, why the he!! do we have to be so suspicious of our own union? Can you form a union to negotiate with your other union on your behalf? To make sure they aren't taking advantage of you? |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1071550)
Sounds great, but LEC members up North don't agree with you. I saw it during a sit in their lounge. They were more into the "aim low" method.
If you are referring to a MSP rep, I checked on that, and from what every other person I have talked to who was a witness to that comment, the quotes are taking what he said out of context. I was not there, so I am going off of what others has told me. If he also thinks that way, he is up for reelection. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1071558)
SWA plus reasonable premiums. Forget the emotional "Caddilac with a month's pay" nonsense and don't even throw around SWA+ in terms of actual total percentages. Just SWA plus reasonable premiums plus COLA to all sections of the contract (and that includes reasonable premiums). The NMB will be extremely hard pressed to say we can't have parity plus reasonable premiums to account for our significantly higher per pilot revenue with a darling super ultra low cost profitable competitor with 100% scope.
Are you managing my expectations?;) Just messing with you. Thanks for the reply. |
KATL to DAL Training Center
What is the quickest and cheapest way to go from Atlanta's airport to the training center on Virginia Avenue?
Thanks. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1071558)
SWA plus reasonable premiums. Forget the emotional "Caddilac with a month's pay" nonsense and don't even throw around SWA+ in terms of actual total percentages. Just SWA plus reasonable premiums plus COLA to all sections of the contract (and that includes reasonable premiums). The NMB will be extremely hard pressed to say we can't have parity plus reasonable premiums to account for our significantly higher per pilot revenue with a darling super ultra low cost profitable competitor with 100% scope.
Be careful what you wish for since you might just get it. Lots of great things reported here about SW but when you go before the NMB they are going to have actual hard numbers of company reports not forum legend. Southwest total block hour costs were 698 verses 690 at Delta. Delta's costs are skewed by 3 and 4 man operations but even when adjusted your looking at 650 for two man ops. In straight compensation Southwest averaged 166,000 per pilot. Delta Average 142,000 per pilot. I don't know about you but my goals are quite a bit higher then that. Airline Data Project |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1071653)
What is the quickest and cheapest way to go from Atlanta's airport to the training center on Virginia Avenue?
Thanks. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands