Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
A change of subject. For those of you world travellers out there, if you are nonreving out of AMS, are there any special procedures to know or do you just check in with the agent to check your bags and get airport listed? I haven't done this in a while and was wondering if it was anything like the fiasco at CDG. Thanks,
Denny
Denny
My wife and I usually connect through AMS when going anywhere in Europe. Seriously, it's easier than connecting through JFK or ATL on Delta! ZED tickets are pretty cheap, European airlines rarely overbook, and there are almost no nonrevs to compete with .
T.O is doing exactly what he is supposed to do - let the process play out, let the line pilots provide their input, the Reps provide direction, and ask what you want. The process is to start with the contract survey.
Don't you find it a little ironic that there is constant yelling that the MEC doesn't listen to you, but then when they are asking your input and waiting to evaluate it you accuse them of lack of leadership?
If this a bottom up organization those on the bottom need to provide some leadership as well instead of just looking for someone to follow and criticizing when they don't like the way the get lead.........
Last edited by Fly4hire; 10-19-2011 at 05:16 PM.
Can you please tell me what you are referencing? I have no idea what you are talking about. Can you give me the rest of the story?
Thanks
MC
No, AMS is far, far easier than CDG in my experience. You just list online and check in using a kiosk just like the US. You can pull up our listings on KLM kiosks, you just need to know your reservation code. If you need help the KLM agents are much nicer and more helpful than Air France agents - again in my experience.
My wife and I usually connect through AMS when going anywhere in Europe. Seriously, it's easier than connecting through JFK or ATL on Delta! ZED tickets are pretty cheap, European airlines rarely overbook, and there are almost no nonrevs to compete with .
My wife and I usually connect through AMS when going anywhere in Europe. Seriously, it's easier than connecting through JFK or ATL on Delta! ZED tickets are pretty cheap, European airlines rarely overbook, and there are almost no nonrevs to compete with .
Denny
IMHO, even if 100% of the pilots did the survey and every single one of us said we want full restoration, I still don't believe that is what they would go ask for. Just my humble O.
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
IF I were to do it, I would open each road show with something along the lines of, "If you guys want RESTORATION, you had better be ready to WALK OFF THE JOB WHEN THE TIME COMES! You MF's had better start building your strike fund NOW!"
Not, "I thought I was done with ALPA work but they pulled me back in, I really don't want to be here..." There's a guy I want to lead the troops...
I think the problem is, how many guys are -really- ready, willing and able to walk, when the time comes? We'll have to wait a year or so to find out, but here's what happened in the past:
Back during the run up to POS 96 at DL South, we had a strike vote. The YES number was never made public but I spoke with several LEC guys after the fact and they were telling me the Yes vote was only about 70%.
They said we needed at least 95% Yes for the strike to be effective, that's why they never released the actual number. POS 96 was a POS, and after 4 years of "Record Profits" while we worked for crap, we were pretty PO'd about it come C2K time.
During C2K, we also had a strike vote, the results were much better, and were made public, I think the official number was 96% Yes. There was better, stronger, more militant leadership with a real Slogan, not "I don't want to be here", but "Restore the Profession!" (Thank You John Malone!) We finally got a pretty good raise (about 25%) plus a nice Retro-check for the 18mo. it took to negotiate it ($25K for me).
So, if you want ME to "represent" you, well, I can't, I can only represent ME. And I want a 50% raise, PLUS benefits, Pluse work rules (6hrs. per day minimum), Plus a Fully Funded 401K, Plus FREE medical insurance, oh, and a whole bunch of other stuff, like $5/dy Per Diem, Deviate DH included.
BUT...it may take a couple years and a walk out to get there. Are you (the big you, as in all DL Pilots) ready for that?
I'll close with what John Malone told me after POS 96 passed and I called him to ask him WHY did so many (morons) vote Yes to that POS??!
"What did you think that rocking chair was for...?"
I don't know if the Silent Majority has the backbone for a real job action.
Last edited by Timbo; 10-19-2011 at 04:21 PM. Reason: sp/clarity
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
While I'm on it, I did notice that for SLI pay, it only gave me the ability to increase it or stay the same... no choices to reduce it. Saw the same thing on several areas that I really am not super concerned with, and might have allowed slight decreases in benefits to in order to gain scope and pay... but the contract answers didn't offer me that choice. It appeared to me that the survey was written by SLI-type guys with an agenda to ensure their pay and work-rules were increased, and one-sided questions were disproportionately placed in the survey to ensure that answer was received.
I'm not the most educated guy here on the contract, despite reading all the material I've been sent and a lot here, and it's possible all the scope issues were well covered by the survey... but it sure SEEMED to me that there were more questions on SLI stuff applicable only to a small fraction, and we could have stood to have some questions specifically on AK, specifically on the AF JV, specifically on bases, specifically on positive space for commutes, on putting DAL pilots on equal footing for DCI non-rev to/from work or even giving us priority, on allowing DAL pilots to book the JS for DCI. This stuff is vastly more important to me, and I'd bet to a much larger fraction of the pilot list (who commute or think they MIGHT commute some time in the future, i.e. nearly everyone!), than the SLI list. And YES, I could write all all this into text boxes, but questions should have been asked on this instead.
I'm not the most educated guy here on the contract, despite reading all the material I've been sent and a lot here, and it's possible all the scope issues were well covered by the survey... but it sure SEEMED to me that there were more questions on SLI stuff applicable only to a small fraction, and we could have stood to have some questions specifically on AK, specifically on the AF JV, specifically on bases, specifically on positive space for commutes, on putting DAL pilots on equal footing for DCI non-rev to/from work or even giving us priority, on allowing DAL pilots to book the JS for DCI. This stuff is vastly more important to me, and I'd bet to a much larger fraction of the pilot list (who commute or think they MIGHT commute some time in the future, i.e. nearly everyone!), than the SLI list. And YES, I could write all all this into text boxes, but questions should have been asked on this instead.
And then there was the positive space tickets for vacation. Where did that come from? Would it be nice? Sure. But before that even enters the discussion we had better already have a grand slam contract already locked in.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
Gloopy,
Yes DAL would have to assume the payments, but using the ACA agreement as you template is way off. All of these agreements have been modified, some require more cash up front if terminated, and some require less. SKW's CPA for example would cost DAL a ton of money, but the RJET or GoJet/CPS CPA's are more "at risk" type of flying.
DAL has reduced the guaranteed margins on many of them but some of that does still exist, and whether or not DAL is on the hook is part of the non disclosed sections of the agreement. I agree with sunset provisions, and like the idea that is they sign a long term deal they should eat that cost just for doing it.
Yes DAL would have to assume the payments, but using the ACA agreement as you template is way off. All of these agreements have been modified, some require more cash up front if terminated, and some require less. SKW's CPA for example would cost DAL a ton of money, but the RJET or GoJet/CPS CPA's are more "at risk" type of flying.
DAL has reduced the guaranteed margins on many of them but some of that does still exist, and whether or not DAL is on the hook is part of the non disclosed sections of the agreement. I agree with sunset provisions, and like the idea that is they sign a long term deal they should eat that cost just for doing it.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
Are they seriously telling us that the AF KLM pilots would not allow a couple of general statements about their pay in relation to ours? Ie, they are paid an average of X % more per hour while working Y days average per month? They accrue Z % more vacation, etc?
Too unbelievable for me to believe. DPA is getting another card.
Too unbelievable for me to believe. DPA is getting another card.
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Yeah and we also had to pick between scope and pay and work rules as we weighed them against one another. This despite the fact that scope erosions hurt pay and QOL. What if our founders had a survey where they had to assign points to freedom and security to pick which one they wanted more. Less of one gets less of the other.
And then there was the positive space tickets for vacation. Where did that come from? Would it be nice? Sure. But before that even enters the discussion we had better already have a grand slam contract already locked in.
And then there was the positive space tickets for vacation. Where did that come from? Would it be nice? Sure. But before that even enters the discussion we had better already have a grand slam contract already locked in.
That Positive Space for Vacation thing has been around for awhile, because you can NEVER for sure, get on a flight with your wife and kids, and actually go on vacation...to someplace nice, where you have made reservations, like maybe a Cruise, etc. One time per year we should be able to KNOW we will get on a flight, any flight, to anywhere, with our Family, to actually "go on vacation".
What we have now are pretty much usless if you want to book a hotel or cruise vacation months out, to a nice location. You won't get on...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post