Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2011, 03:46 PM
  #78321  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
A change of subject. For those of you world travellers out there, if you are nonreving out of AMS, are there any special procedures to know or do you just check in with the agent to check your bags and get airport listed? I haven't done this in a while and was wondering if it was anything like the fiasco at CDG. Thanks,
Denny
No, AMS is far, far easier than CDG in my experience. You just list online and check in using a kiosk just like the US. You can pull up our listings on KLM kiosks, you just need to know your reservation code. If you need help the KLM agents are much nicer and more helpful than Air France agents - again in my experience.

My wife and I usually connect through AMS when going anywhere in Europe. Seriously, it's easier than connecting through JFK or ATL on Delta! ZED tickets are pretty cheap, European airlines rarely overbook, and there are almost no nonrevs to compete with .
JungleBus is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 03:50 PM
  #78322  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
Why does that surprise you? We have a MEC Chairman who opens each road show with, "I really don't want to be here..."

Can we not find someone who DOES want the job??
You mean one who wants to climb all the way to National and leads from the top down?

T.O is doing exactly what he is supposed to do - let the process play out, let the line pilots provide their input, the Reps provide direction, and ask what you want. The process is to start with the contract survey.

Don't you find it a little ironic that there is constant yelling that the MEC doesn't listen to you, but then when they are asking your input and waiting to evaluate it you accuse them of lack of leadership?

If this a bottom up organization those on the bottom need to provide some leadership as well instead of just looking for someone to follow and criticizing when they don't like the way the get lead.........


Last edited by Fly4hire; 10-19-2011 at 05:16 PM.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 03:54 PM
  #78323  
Line Holder
 
Model Citezen's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: A320
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
Why does that surprise you? We have a MEC Chairman who opens each road show with, "I really don't want to be here..."

Can we not find someone who DOES want the job??
Timbo,
Can you please tell me what you are referencing? I have no idea what you are talking about. Can you give me the rest of the story?
Thanks
MC
Model Citezen is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:01 PM
  #78324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus View Post
No, AMS is far, far easier than CDG in my experience. You just list online and check in using a kiosk just like the US. You can pull up our listings on KLM kiosks, you just need to know your reservation code. If you need help the KLM agents are much nicer and more helpful than Air France agents - again in my experience.

My wife and I usually connect through AMS when going anywhere in Europe. Seriously, it's easier than connecting through JFK or ATL on Delta! ZED tickets are pretty cheap, European airlines rarely overbook, and there are almost no nonrevs to compete with .
Thanks JungleBus! Our plans to go to Bangkok on Friday got changed this morning with all the flooding going on in Bangkok itself. Had to make a last minute change in plans. We decided to get eurail passes for traveling between countries. Thought it would be a nice change. Thanks again!

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:15 PM
  #78325  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire View Post
Don't you find it a little ironic that their is constant yelling that the MEC doesn't listen to you, but then when they are asking your input and waiting to evaluate it you accuse them of lack of leadership? [/IMG]
We as Delta pilots want to get paid handsomely and we don't want the regionals doing 50% of our flying. Do they really need to wait for the survey to quell some fears on those issues?

IMHO, even if 100% of the pilots did the survey and every single one of us said we want full restoration, I still don't believe that is what they would go ask for. Just my humble O.
capncrunch is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:16 PM
  #78326  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
I vote for Carl, or YOU........you can do it Timbo.....please?

IF I were to do it, I would open each road show with something along the lines of, "If you guys want RESTORATION, you had better be ready to WALK OFF THE JOB WHEN THE TIME COMES! You MF's had better start building your strike fund NOW!"

Not, "I thought I was done with ALPA work but they pulled me back in, I really don't want to be here..." There's a guy I want to lead the troops...

I think the problem is, how many guys are -really- ready, willing and able to walk, when the time comes? We'll have to wait a year or so to find out, but here's what happened in the past:

Back during the run up to POS 96 at DL South, we had a strike vote. The YES number was never made public but I spoke with several LEC guys after the fact and they were telling me the Yes vote was only about 70%.

They said we needed at least 95% Yes for the strike to be effective, that's why they never released the actual number. POS 96 was a POS, and after 4 years of "Record Profits" while we worked for crap, we were pretty PO'd about it come C2K time.

During C2K, we also had a strike vote, the results were much better, and were made public, I think the official number was 96% Yes. There was better, stronger, more militant leadership with a real Slogan, not "I don't want to be here", but "Restore the Profession!" (Thank You John Malone!) We finally got a pretty good raise (about 25%) plus a nice Retro-check for the 18mo. it took to negotiate it ($25K for me).

So, if you want ME to "represent" you, well, I can't, I can only represent ME. And I want a 50% raise, PLUS benefits, Pluse work rules (6hrs. per day minimum), Plus a Fully Funded 401K, Plus FREE medical insurance, oh, and a whole bunch of other stuff, like $5/dy Per Diem, Deviate DH included.

BUT...it may take a couple years and a walk out to get there. Are you (the big you, as in all DL Pilots) ready for that?

I'll close with what John Malone told me after POS 96 passed and I called him to ask him WHY did so many (morons) vote Yes to that POS??!

"What did you think that rocking chair was for...?"

I don't know if the Silent Majority has the backbone for a real job action.

Last edited by Timbo; 10-19-2011 at 04:21 PM. Reason: sp/clarity
Timbo is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:17 PM
  #78327  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill View Post
While I'm on it, I did notice that for SLI pay, it only gave me the ability to increase it or stay the same... no choices to reduce it. Saw the same thing on several areas that I really am not super concerned with, and might have allowed slight decreases in benefits to in order to gain scope and pay... but the contract answers didn't offer me that choice. It appeared to me that the survey was written by SLI-type guys with an agenda to ensure their pay and work-rules were increased, and one-sided questions were disproportionately placed in the survey to ensure that answer was received.
I'm not the most educated guy here on the contract, despite reading all the material I've been sent and a lot here, and it's possible all the scope issues were well covered by the survey... but it sure SEEMED to me that there were more questions on SLI stuff applicable only to a small fraction, and we could have stood to have some questions specifically on AK, specifically on the AF JV, specifically on bases, specifically on positive space for commutes, on putting DAL pilots on equal footing for DCI non-rev to/from work or even giving us priority, on allowing DAL pilots to book the JS for DCI. This stuff is vastly more important to me, and I'd bet to a much larger fraction of the pilot list (who commute or think they MIGHT commute some time in the future, i.e. nearly everyone!), than the SLI list. And YES, I could write all all this into text boxes, but questions should have been asked on this instead.
Yeah and we also had to pick between scope and pay and work rules as we weighed them against one another. This despite the fact that scope erosions hurt pay and QOL. What if our founders had a survey where they had to assign points to freedom and security to pick which one they wanted more. Less of one gets less of the other.

And then there was the positive space tickets for vacation. Where did that come from? Would it be nice? Sure. But before that even enters the discussion we had better already have a grand slam contract already locked in.
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:25 PM
  #78328  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Gloopy,

Yes DAL would have to assume the payments, but using the ACA agreement as you template is way off. All of these agreements have been modified, some require more cash up front if terminated, and some require less. SKW's CPA for example would cost DAL a ton of money, but the RJET or GoJet/CPS CPA's are more "at risk" type of flying.

DAL has reduced the guaranteed margins on many of them but some of that does still exist, and whether or not DAL is on the hook is part of the non disclosed sections of the agreement. I agree with sunset provisions, and like the idea that is they sign a long term deal they should eat that cost just for doing it.
That's what I'm saying. There is this arguement that if we get one outsourced RJ back in scope negotiations we will lose staggering amounts of barganing capital and that just isn't so. I want to see immediate, significant outsourcing reductions starting on day one and progressing rapidly over the next several years until anything over 50 seats is either parked or brought back in house. Allowed 50 seater outsourcing should be reduced in line with the company's scheduled reductions of them anyway. And turbo props should be treated like jets. A pilot block our is a pilot block hour.
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:30 PM
  #78329  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
Default

Originally Posted by FlyZ View Post
Are they seriously telling us that the AF KLM pilots would not allow a couple of general statements about their pay in relation to ours? Ie, they are paid an average of X % more per hour while working Y days average per month? They accrue Z % more vacation, etc?

Too unbelievable for me to believe. DPA is getting another card.
I can understand their esire not to have the details of their contracts blasted all over the media, which is what would happen if the details were released. But like you said, the percentages would actually help their case and public PR because all it would do is call out the American companies for undercutting their work force. I doubt they would have a problem with that. The "delta" (pun) between us and them is all that matters and we should get to see that.
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:31 PM
  #78330  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Yeah and we also had to pick between scope and pay and work rules as we weighed them against one another. This despite the fact that scope erosions hurt pay and QOL. What if our founders had a survey where they had to assign points to freedom and security to pick which one they wanted more. Less of one gets less of the other.

And then there was the positive space tickets for vacation. Where did that come from? Would it be nice? Sure. But before that even enters the discussion we had better already have a grand slam contract already locked in.

That Positive Space for Vacation thing has been around for awhile, because you can NEVER for sure, get on a flight with your wife and kids, and actually go on vacation...to someplace nice, where you have made reservations, like maybe a Cruise, etc. One time per year we should be able to KNOW we will get on a flight, any flight, to anywhere, with our Family, to actually "go on vacation".

What we have now are pretty much usless if you want to book a hotel or cruise vacation months out, to a nice location. You won't get on...
Timbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices