![]() |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1074281)
Nope. Not going to work. Not even close.
Not. Even. Close. Chuck |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1074280)
As for pay, does RA think our bankruptcy emergency survival loan contract is some new world order in the permantly changed landscape of pilot costs?
I understand and agree with the ALPA stance on not publicizing our survey results and not publicizing our negotiating priorities. I can even live with not knowing what the opener is. However, after the last two road shows I went to where I heard TO and other union guys be very critical of the APA, I get the feeling that they are of the opinion that aiming lower to get something now is better than negotiating for an extended period of time for (larger) gains they don't feel are achievable. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1074285)
They would only get the positions above anyone that they brought with them above anyone. We would all get their retirements as well and benefit from the combined network.
Or we could wait til AK grows another 15-20+% and then merge with them. Or not merge with them and keep or increase the massive mainline outsourcing. There would be some downside to a HI merger, but the upsides would outweigh them. You did bring up a good point about relative seniority dramatically buffed by a short burst of hiring over a few months. Should that buff the entire list by the same percentage over an entire career? We would certainly make that case to the arbitrator but either way we're not done with mergers. |
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 1074268)
How about 4% yoy not 3% ;-)
|
Originally Posted by Whidbey
(Post 1074303)
I get the feeling that is what our union is preparing us for. The company will certainly argue that the passage of time (and the JCBA) constitute a tacit acceptance of that position on our part. Accepting marginal pay and work rule improvements "over the life of a contract" will certainly reset the baseline.
I understand and agree with the ALPA stance on not publicizing our survey results and not publicizing our negotiating priorities. I can even live with not knowing what the opener is. However, after the last two road shows I went to where I heard TO and other union guys be very critical of the APA, I get the feeling that they are of the opinion that aiming lower to get something now is better than negotiating for an extended period of time for (larger) gains they don't feel are achievable. We have tried the huge opener at Delta. In the end we got a lower rate then could have been achieved with a more reasonable opener and lost half the 16 aircraft on order. The problem with a huge opener is what do you do when the company says the following on 1 Apr. Company:Thank you for your opener. We will get back to you with a response in June. DALPA: June? That is not acceptable. Its almost 2 months away. We want to talk sooner. Company: You must have misunderstood us. We meant June of 2014! Goodbye. There are two things in a contract negotiation that have to always be considered. What you want and what is achievable. The two are almost never the same. The majority of pilots are rational enough to understand that concept. The rest will simply always be unhappy and looking for someone or something to blame. So if I negotiate for a car and the sticker is $18,500. What is attainable is paying, $18,500. If I fought it out and played the game right and leverage myself I might walk out with $16,000. Dealer may be laughing because he paid $10K for the car. Or he may have paid $16K and just wanted it off the lot. How do you know? You don't, but you sure won't win if you start at $19,500. |
Contract survey just extended 72 hours. Apparently a lot of guys decided to get serious about it over the weekend. Pilots.....sheesh. ;)
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1074323)
Contract survey just extended 72 hours. Apparently a lot of guys decided to get serious about it over the weekend. Pilots.....sheesh. ;)
|
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1074328)
That's pathetic. Why should we extend it because a guy can't find the time during the window it was open? Obviously, he doesn't care enough to provide input in a timely manner - then he shouldn't get to.
|
2012 flying .. Delta shrinking
While management touts the "success" of our code share and Joint Ventures, here are the numbers. Alaska is growing. Delta is shrinking twice as fast as other airlines and faster than our pilots are retiring:
To put this in perspective, we are shrinking even faster than United, who is going through their post merger route rationalization. We are the fastest shrinking airline in the United States and possibly the World. Boyd tends to crunch numbers inclusive of "brand" flying done by DCI carriers. I have no doubt that our numbers are effected by the retirement of a mass of 50 seaters. Still, management does not get off the hook. We need to start reminding them when they say "there is no 100 seat platform" we need to send that lie down in flames by asking how much they paid for 255 100 seat jets with 76 seats installed in them. |
My min level was 70% with 7% year over year. Just doing md88 to southwest conversion.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands