Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2011 | 04:38 AM
  #84121  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin
Those would be three completely different statements/time lines. I don't waste my time teaching my dog calculus. I should do the same in having a logical discussion with Mr. Almighty Whale Captain.


OK, let's take my statements one at a time:

Carl Spackler
The NMB is not involved from the start, so you don't have to worry about losing them from the start. They're only involved at the end of the normal process when one or more parties seek the NMB.

This is absolutely correct. Since it is the parties themselves that decide when the normal negotiations process is futile, they also decide when it has ended for them. When that decision has been made by the parties, seeking NMB involvement is the next step in the process.

Carl Spackler
Regardless, the NMB is not involved in openers or negotiations until their latter stages.

This is also correct. The NMB is not involved in openers at all. The NMB is only involved at the latter stages of negotiations, typically when someone wants an impasse declared. The only body that actually gets to decide that an impasse actually exists and a 30 day cooling off period begins is the NMB.

Carl Spackler
Regardless, the NMB is not involved in openers or negotiations until their latter stages. So please enlighten this fool. So is your final answer in regards to the NMB:

A: "That is much sooner than the NMB normally gets involved."
B: "They're only involved at the end of the normal process when one or more parties seek the NMB."
or

C: "Regardless, the NMB is not involved in openers or negotiations until their latter stages."

Items B and C are explained above. Item A is also entirely consistent with my statements above. In our contract, we didn't want the company to have the ability to drag negotiations out for years before the NMB was called, so we have a provision giving a date certain when the NMB will be called by both sides to become involved if an agreement hasn't been reached in direct negotiations. Because this is in our contract, we've already decided a date certain when the normal negotiations process has ended and NMB involvement begins. This contract provisions sets up NMB involvement much sooner than is normally the case. But either way, it signifies the end of the normal negotiations process.

You seem intent on trying to find contradiction where there is none, so maybe you're right about that teaching a dog calculus comment.

Carl
Old 12-22-2011 | 04:47 AM
  #84122  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
How would any of this have prevented the Colgan crash? Answer: it wouldn't. More DC eye wash BS.
Exactly right. This entire process began because of the Colgan crash. These rules were meant to prevent its reoccurence by reducing fatigue.

Eye wash instead.

Carl
Old 12-22-2011 | 04:59 AM
  #84123  
iaflyer's Avatar
seeing the country...
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,014
Likes: 41
From: 73N A
Default

As for the 2-man Europe flying, remember the max flight time depends on your start time, in Home Base Time, (or local if acclimated) so many of those reports in Europe are before 0500 eastern time (NYC, ATL, DTW crews) so they would be limited to 8 hours flight time, and need a relief FO.
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:09 AM
  #84124  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
As for the 2-man Europe flying, remember the max flight time depends on your start time, in Home Base Time, (or local if acclimated) so many of those reports in Europe are before 0500 eastern time (NYC, ATL, DTW crews) so they would be limited to 8 hours flight time, and need a relief FO.
Thanks for this. I haven't don't any international, so I'm not familiar with the rules. I'm sure it's the same for many others. This is helpful.
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:15 AM
  #84125  
Doing Nothing
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Default

Anyone else see that there will be no more 24 hour short call for intl???!!? Score!
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:17 AM
  #84126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: A-320/A
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Me and Chloe are on it! I juuusst need to diffuse this one last bomb then we are headed to Washington to take care o bniss!
Watched the youtube video on Jack Abrahamoff. I think that most (thinking) people understand that this is how it gets done in DC. I wish I could come up with a way to change that. Abrahamoff said it well toward the end of the interview "....when you're elected to office, you should come to DC, represent your constituants, and then GO HOME!!!) Oh, that that were a reality
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:18 AM
  #84127  
sinca3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cni187
Anyone else see that there will be no more 24 hour short call for intl???!!? Score!
Yeah down to 14hrs....big win!!
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:22 AM
  #84128  
sinca3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Unhappy

Anyone think that the 8hr hard time will reduce the scheduled flying in a day, thus making each day worth less. Therefore our 3 and possibly 4 day trips will will need to be stretched to 5 our more to madge it a viable trip. I'm talking domestic here....
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:35 AM
  #84129  
Phuz's Avatar
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: DTW 717A
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
Anyone think that the 8hr hard time will reduce the scheduled flying in a day, thus making each day worth less. Therefore our 3 and possibly 4 day trips will will need to be stretched to 5 our more to madge it a viable trip. I'm talking domestic here....
You're currently getting more than 8 block in a day?

Block per day was actually increased to 9 if you show 0500-1959.
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:36 AM
  #84130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: A-320/A
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Buzz, I might not have the pictures anymore. Maybe a little reconstructive surgery...

btw I found this one:

JobHopper already responded correctly, but w/o the pic. Happened on the old MEM Guard ramp, north side of the airport. Fueler incorrectly fueled the aircraft. It sat on the ramp for about a week like this. Not sure of the year, but, maybe 2003-2004 time frame. Man, that's a sad sight even for a Navy guy
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices