Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Doing Nothing
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
When ALPA asks the pilots masses " do you want higher pay or profit sharing?" Can they also say "Do you want compensation taxed at 8% or compensation taxed at 25%." I hope everyone noticed the amount of FEDERAL TAXES that were taken out of yout compensation labeled as "profit sharing"
Last edited by cni187; 02-13-2012 at 10:19 AM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
And...to add to that thought, the "Next Big Thing" Delta is (talking about) getting is the 787 (in 2020). Using the age old weight, speed, #seats formula, that aricraft is going to fit in somewhere around the 767ER, size/pay wise, yet it will be the replacement jet for the 747, 777, 765, and A330. Pay cuts all around.
10 years from now we could be looking at a 2 aircraft type fleet; 737's for domestic and 787's as our highest paying International Widebody. Our previous CEO, Jerry the Genius told me as much when he was on my flight to Amsterdam one day, about 3mo. prior to bankruptcy.
We may want to reconsider our pay formula as newer airplanes shrink, and go with longevity pay, or suffer the consequenses of ever smaller new (replacement) jets. Richard is on record spouting that frequency matters more than size, so look for a smaller overall gauge in new aircraft, with more frequency. This was the same philosophy RJ Fred Reid used to bring us all the RJ's in the first place. "The Business Man want's Frequency!"
I doubt Delta is ever going to order any A380's or 747-800's...so what does that leave in the way of new (replacement) jets?
10 years from now we could be looking at a 2 aircraft type fleet; 737's for domestic and 787's as our highest paying International Widebody. Our previous CEO, Jerry the Genius told me as much when he was on my flight to Amsterdam one day, about 3mo. prior to bankruptcy.
We may want to reconsider our pay formula as newer airplanes shrink, and go with longevity pay, or suffer the consequenses of ever smaller new (replacement) jets. Richard is on record spouting that frequency matters more than size, so look for a smaller overall gauge in new aircraft, with more frequency. This was the same philosophy RJ Fred Reid used to bring us all the RJ's in the first place. "The Business Man want's Frequency!"
I doubt Delta is ever going to order any A380's or 747-800's...so what does that leave in the way of new (replacement) jets?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
I never understood why we have so many AE's. You would think the company would want to save money on training events like they do with everything else going on around us! I propose some stability in everyone's life and those that are unfortunate to be displaced only bid on open vacancy's. That way we have some control in our lives, this is very stressful.
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
I think we should have daily AE's, that way I can fly a 737 to St. Thomas on Tuesdays and a 777 to Dubai on the weekends...
Dual Pool Baby! Kind of like the old T37/38 ACE program for the AF heavy drivers.
Training costs? Hell, I'll be getting so many landings, I won't need to go back to a sim for 3 years!
Dual Pool Baby! Kind of like the old T37/38 ACE program for the AF heavy drivers.
Training costs? Hell, I'll be getting so many landings, I won't need to go back to a sim for 3 years!
Hear hear! We will be shooting ourselves in the foot if we don't fix this issue. For a huge company like ours with multiple airplane types, pay banding is the way to go. I laugh at our pilots when they compare SWA 737 rates with our 777/747s. 100% of SWA pilots make that pay. Only a small fraction of our pilot groups make 777/747 pay. Pay-band us together and lets negotiate our way to SWA + much more!! The only smaller thing we have from SWA 737s are the mad dogs. We'll be in a much better position to negotiate once we're pay-banded.
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Earlier today my wife made the observation; "Hey, if we could just get that extra 4.85% every month, it would be like your OLD paychecks!" And I had to remeind her, Yeah but, I was a domestic 757 driver back then, not a 777 Capt...
I don't know about you guys, but getting such a small piece of our pie (4.85%) back, once a year, when we gave up 42%, plus our DB money, just ****es me off, more than makes me want to celebrate.
Kind of a painful reminder of exactly how much we gave away.
Sure it's better than getting zilch, no doubt, but still...it would be nice to have that little 'extra' every month.
I'm sure Ed won't be getting any sleep tonight though...
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
* I don't want to encourage seasonal bidding, and above all, I absolutely don't want to see Block/Reserve. But that's just me.
Actually, the NWA APA system had very little "churn" at the bottom of each category, despite the fact that there were monthly awards. This seems to be the principal worry that fDAL guys have about the APA system.
The excess at the bottom of each category was mitigated by the Temporary Position system, which was extremely popular with commuters, and so almost always went quite senior. Lots of people benefit when senior guys bid temp positions. The senior guys get free travel & hotels to work, the mid guys in the permanent category move up, and the bottom guys stay in their position.
People forget that displacements cost the company money no matter how it's done, all at once, or a trickle over some months. The Temp system mitigated that by letting people even out the slight surpluses between bases.
Some people like the AE process because they say it lets people hang on to the bottom of a category longer than they normally would. But it also traps those same people, for months on end, where they might be happier in another, more junior category or a different base.
The monthly awards process smoothed the bumps, made it very easy to see the ebb and flow, and there were very few surprises.
Of course, sharpshooting the system, knowing exactly when you were going to training, and when you'd be in your position were nice parts of the system, as well.
The block/reserve separate category thing is a different matter. That system mostly benefited commuters, in that if you got the boot off the bottom of one category, you could just displaced into another blockholder position, and not worry about commuting to reserve. Honestly, I think we can do without it, BUT, you could emulate the benefit by setting up some kind of ultra long call reserve system that takes some of the sting out.
Nu
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




