![]() |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1143196)
Your points are valid to an extent. Perception however is everything. Management will have to cough up some major money to the other employees after we sign if its a great contract.
And the pilots have been saving FA jobs by the tens of thousands by paying to negotiate their scope. I'm done with the cat rancher Bolshevism. It just doesn't apply. |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1143260)
According to Sailing, F/As are at 92% of pre-BK pay and pilots are at 60% of pre-BK pay.
(given - one number is adjusted for inflation and the other is not) I think Sailing proves the point that pilots need to come up a bit more to catch up with the other work groups (or at least F/As) when it comes to restoration. |
So why does the RPTOR arrival not have all the points loaded in the box, or is just the maddog that gets to perform this FDMS exercise?
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1143226)
Management doesn't have to increase other employees salaries at all. It's strictly up to the whim of the company in it's sole discretion for these non-contract employees.
|
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1143266)
Interesting. Recently listened to a base ALPA rep explain that we should not be focused on this above. Instead of using the metric outlined in the agreement, EASK for passenger and freight, he claimed that we should focus on the block hours.
His next claim was that we are way ahead in block hours as compared to the Atlantic JV partners to the tune of 68% done by Delta. Unbelievable the spin, but 100% true. Of course we are because we fly the smaller jets across the pond. AF is carrying more tonnage per pilot than we are. What we are seeing is what happens on the backside of the JV. If we ever see a front side to it, our growth will be 3 block hrs to every on of theirs. In a growth cycle we have to add more flying because we use smaller jets. If we were both using similar gauge jets, it would be 1-1. Often stated but true; One 380 equates to about three 767 worth of flying. The unintended consequence is that they fly bigger metal and we fly smaller metal at a lower pay rate. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1143199)
A full restoration contract would cost the company somewhere in the 1.5 to 2 billion dollar a year range for pilots. You would need about a 65% raise with inflation and going back to the old standard of quality of life would require the company hire in excess of 4000 pilots. There would be additional costs in dealing with the fallout with the other employees.
Again, I don't give a **** what other employee groups want. They already got theirs. I care about what you and I get back. That's OUR money paying off the Delta debt. We need to have high expectations my friend. Settle for nothing less. Feel that wind in your sails Sailingfun my man. All of our voices together will be the wind that pushes us forward. Regards, NA |
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1143244)
at least carl comes up with a good rebuttal before he attacks. I guess if you can't come up with an intelligent response then just revert to name calling. What grade school do you currently attend ?
|
Meh...not worth it. I'll let others do their own thinking...
Nu |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1143255)
So, you don't think we should get large raises and better work rules?
Flame on soldier. |
Originally Posted by Whidbey
(Post 1143198)
From a lurker and occasional poster-
Great discussion about pay and contract expectations. One thing that I think we're losing sight of is that there are literally thousands of pilots that want jobs at Delta that are willing to work harder than we are for much less money. The company's position is a direct result of that fact. It's simple economics. Deserve has got nothing to do with it. One other thing. Delta has been hiring a good number of folks with zero PIC. Safety arguments aside, that strategy is going to have an impact on the pilot group. Those pilots have less opportunity to gain employment elsewhere and I believe their votes may reflect that. Tsquare's statements about youth entitlement in this case are dead on, IMHO. The pilots in the top half of the seniority list are a product of a much more selective process than us youngsters. It's much harder to get an electrician's apprenticeship than to gain admission to a puppy mill. If those flight hour requirements don't get implemented and enforced, what used to be a profession will have been irreversibly changed to more of a trade. How we perceive ourselves is what it's all about. If we have the attitude that we should accept less because someone else will do it cheaper is not the right attitude. Hundreds of people trust us to fly them in a multimillion dollar thin metal tube at 35,000 feet going 600mph over great distances every time we go to work. Stop and think about that. The level of trust and responsibility the public and our management places in our hands is not comparable to any other "trade." There are many other professions that pay more with much less responsibility. The new flight time requirements are a great idea. NA |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands