Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 03-01-2012 | 12:54 PM
  #91021  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
They've put a ton of $$$ in them. They're here until they get that money back. Lots of airlines still fly 4 engine airplanes. Just because they have twice as many motors doesn't mean they don't make $$$.
True dat.. but they DO burn twice as much gas.. or more... and there is a point of diminishing returns. When those airplanes operating margin is what they want it to be, they get parked. There is a curve, and when it hits that curve, out they go. They will cut their losses rather than continue losing money (when the point to operate the aircraft becomes too great) regardless of how much they have invested in lie flats etc...
Old 03-01-2012 | 12:55 PM
  #91022  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
THAT's where we are NOW!!!!! That's where we are going!!!! In case you haven't noticed, the 737-900 is smaller than the 767.
It is smaller, and the 739 should be banded with the 739 and the 767 with the 765 and 330 if we go that way. The rest of the domestic narrow body jets should be banded together to a floor of 77 seats.

There are many things at play here wrt to the WB fleet; Fences, the JV, debt, mergers or acquisitions and the economy all are playing a part.

RA recently stated to a LCA friend, that we would not see a 787 until they produced at least 200. Well 200 and 2020 are vastly different based on the planned production run.
Old 03-01-2012 | 12:56 PM
  #91023  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
RA has commented on the four engine jets many times throughout the last decade, but keep in mind; The 748i is 20% more efficient than the 744. If DAL knows they can fill it, it makes sense to buy a handful of them. It just depends on where they want the airline to go. If they opt to operate an airline the 773 and the 748 could have their place. The 789 will also be a major player in our fleet going forward for those point to point routes in Asia, and the ME.

The 748i would be good on ATL-ICN (good enough for a 380), ATL-DXB, ATL-CAI, NYC-TLV, DTW-HKG, DTW-ICN, LAX-ICN, ATL-NRT, LAX-NRT, ATL-JNB etc. Anywhere we need a lot of cargo lift it makes sense. Frequency can solve that, but we lack lift and frequency in to a lot of markets.
That's pie in the sky. You want to bet your future on THAT? I know I certainly don't. Until it has a widget on the tail and is in the bid package, I don't care about it.
Old 03-01-2012 | 12:56 PM
  #91024  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
True dat.. but they DO burn twice as much gas.. or more... and there is a point of diminishing returns. When those airplanes operating margin is what they want it to be, they get parked. There is a curve, and when it hits that curve, out they go. They will cut their losses rather than continue losing money (when the point to operate the aircraft becomes too great) regardless of how much they have invested in lie flats etc...
T;
The do burn a lot more gas, but they carry about 60K more pounds of cargo than a ER. DAL fills those birds up with cargo on almost every leg. With the CASM where it is, there is a lot of room for fuel to spike. The truer fact is when the cargo goes away the jets go away.
Old 03-01-2012 | 12:57 PM
  #91025  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kingbird87
It's a fantastic day here in West Tennessee. I'm going out to the deer lease to see the new old tractor we got to manage the land. Two Delta pilots managed to break the old W. German John Deere last season. Luckily, we have four retired mechanics in the lease. I had my "hair shirt" on earlier this morning. I value each of you as my peers and the efforts you make each day on behalf of Delta Air Lines. I stand by my comments and appreciate the discourse. We are at a watershed. Frustration is building to a fever pitch. We can use that to change the course of our careers, or we can Red Book/Green Book, Delta/Western/PanAm ourselves into the mediocre middle of the pack. I was hired at Western, got the green light at Delta, went to Northwest and flew on the Red side, spent the last 23 years in a Green base and had a relative that flew for PanAm. They are or were all among the best this profession has offered. Unity.
I'll consider that a great way to end this tangent. We got where we are both separately and together, but we sure aren't going anywhere good separately. We're not going anywhere separately, come to think of it.
Old 03-01-2012 | 12:57 PM
  #91026  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
It is smaller, and the 739 should be banded with the 739 and the 767 with the 765 and 330 if we go that way. The rest of the domestic narrow body jets should be banded together to a floor of 77 seats.
Sell me on this point. And I assume you meant the 739 should be with the 757/767.. But convince me why there should now be 3 bands.
Old 03-01-2012 | 12:58 PM
  #91027  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
That's pie in the sky. You want to bet your future on THAT? I know I certainly don't. Until it has a widget on the tail and is in the bid package, I don't care about it.
T;
I was making a point that we have the cargo statistics to support those jets. That is all.

I also know as soon as we band pay and put an order in for the 773 or 748 pilots will go all up in arms because it will pay the same as a 772 or a 330. Like I said, it needs a debate and to be voted on. It was part of the survey.
Old 03-01-2012 | 01:03 PM
  #91028  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Sell me on this point. And I assume you meant the 739 should be with the 757/767.. But convince me why there should now be 3 bands.
Simple. The 757 will be going away long before the ER's do. The ER's in many instances will be here for another 20+ years. Therefore you want to pull it up. You will not be able to pull the 739 up to the WB band, but most will not agree that it should be in the NB band. It is effectively the CAL Wide, LN, SN scheme. It also allows for the 787 to pay the same as the 767(wide) and 777 if you use three bands.

The middle band allows for the 321, 739, 757, 753 to all be in that middle band while keeping the predominantly international jets separate. It leaves some room for negotiation. If you wanted make it four bands, but then all you are really doing is banding the nb jets and keeping the 777 and 744 separate.

For you blood pressure, there is a lot of traction on banding. It just needs to be done correctly, that is all.
Old 03-01-2012 | 01:05 PM
  #91029  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
T;
I was making a point that we have the cargo statistics to support those jets. That is all.

I also know as soon as we band pay and put an order in for the 773 or 748 pilots will go all up in arms because it will pay the same as a 772 or a 330. Like I said, it needs a debate and to be voted on. It was part of the survey.
So the 500 guys at the top of the list would get ****ed... TFB. I want MORE of the 12000 other guys making what THEY are making. If their egos are so small that they cannot handle that, then this is a truly sad situation. oooooooh my airplane is bigger so I should make more.. GMAFB

Throttles... pushed... get paid. simple
Old 03-01-2012 | 01:08 PM
  #91030  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Simple. The 757 will be going away long before the ER's do. The ER's in many instances will be here for another 20+ years. Therefore you want to pull it up. You will not be able to pull the 739 up to the WB band, but most will not agree that it should be in the NB band. It is effectively the CAL Wide, LN, SN scheme. It also allows for the 787 to pay the same as the 767(wide) and 777 if you use three bands.

The middle band allows for the 321, 739, 757, 753 to all be in that middle band while keeping the predominantly international jets separate. It leaves some room for negotiation. If you wanted make it four bands, but then all you are really doing is banding the nb jets and keeping the 777 and 744 separate.

For you blood pressure, there is a lot of traction on banding. It just needs to be done correctly, that is all.
You get what you negotiate. No need for the middle band. Two is one too many IMHO, but I have conceded this far.

My BP is fine, but thanks for your concern..
I can't figure out how to imbed a video, so here ya go.. it's all in how you count.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices