![]() |
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1145426)
You don't have to be personally associated with them, but you WILL be paying dues to them inside of 18-months.
|
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 1145604)
Damn! I was hoping to get back to Tbilisi this month. Thanks for the info, though!
BTW, your expectations for our next contract are pretty close to mine. I sure hope the MEC isn't setting their sights lower than that. You make a good argument for an early abbreviated agreement outside of section 6 negotiations. It would be good to raise the bar as AA and UCAL are negotiating agreements. I also think that management is all too aware of how much more smoothly the operation runs if we are on board. In the normal course of doing business, the pilots do a lot to grease the gears of Delta Air Lines. I bet Delta management can even put a rough dollar amount on this, based upon their experiences in 1996 and 2000. I'm not saying we would start throwing sand in the gears-- that would be an illegal job action. Nor would it be any sort of concerted action, started on this or other web boards I'm just thinking that guys would be generally disgruntled, and would not go above and beyond to make the operation run well, if negotiations weren't going well. But here's an interesting question: If DALPA signs off on a two year extension with modest improvements with no meaningful scope recapture, and does so without MEMRAT, must we still not consider an in-house union given the fact that openers would be exchanged just 14 months later?? Carl |
Originally Posted by clancy
(Post 1145612)
You think so? They only have 2300 active cards and to be counting the 2000 that are a year old is like counting chickens before the eggs hatch. They are done, but just don't know it. $55,000 in donations down the drain to LS.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1145613)
I don't recall sailingfun making an argument to do a short term extension outside of Section, just that it may well happen. I recall him stating what he wanted for the life of the next contract in the hopes of getting one by the amendable date of our current one. Thus capitalizing on the time value of money now versus more money later after a longer negotiating time frame.
But here's an interesting question: If DALPA signs off on a two year extension with modest improvements with no meaningful scope recapture, and does so without MEMRAT, must we still not consider an in-house union given the fact that openers would be exchanged just 14 months later?? Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1145613)
I don't recall sailingfun making an argument to do a short term extension outside of Section, just that it may well happen. I recall him stating what he wanted for the life of the next contract in the hopes of getting one by the amendable date of our current one. Thus capitalizing on the time value of money now versus more money later after a longer negotiating time frame.
But here's an interesting question: If DALPA signs off on a two year extension with modest improvements with no meaningful scope recapture, and does so without MEMRAT, must we still not consider an in-house union given the fact that openers would be exchanged just 14 months later?? Carl What are you basing your assertion that an extension may very well happen? Just curious. I do agree with you that is an extension occurs without significant improvements, that there would be a riot. At this point though it is just useless conjecture and speculation based on nothing. I would think that any extension of this nature once section 6 begins, would require memrat, but I do not know the legalities. Maybe that stud Seehan can tell ya.:D |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1145602)
How did SWA rates compare with Delta Express rates?
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1145602)
How did SWA W-2's compare with DAL W-2s during your example timeframe?
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1145602)
Not punching holes in what you wrote, there is more to the story though.
Look at the regional industry for more examples. CMR and ASA have payrates that are pretty much in line with each other, but most of their Captains have 16-18 years longevity. Compass's most senior pilots have 5 years. That difference in longevity has created a labor arbitrage that's helping to kill the "legacy" regionals. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1145617)
You don't know what you're talking about Clancy. Post your evidence and prove me wrong. And post it on the other thread please.
Carl |
We are launching our version of the Trim Tab, to be called, The Torque Tube.
THE TORQUE TUBE In this addition: 1. Yes we have a small surplus of pilots which isn't enough to handle life, 739s and all you who quit with little notice. So no early outs for you. So I guess it's really not a small surplus after all? 2. 17 DC-9s. Word. 3. The 6 month line check of 60+ is gone. 4. this goes with #3, they're anticipating another spike in STDs at the Villages. http://www.55places.com/images/commu...llages2-11.jpg :D |
Nqat?
Anyone know what NQAT means on the pbs calendar?
I'm scheduled for initial training (again) in late april and it shows me in my future category for bidding purposes. Does this mean I won't fly in my current category the whole month leading up to training? I don't start training until the 24th of April. 3.5 weeks of vacation? I'm sure I'm missing something as usual. I'm thinking maybe Non Qualified Awaiting Training?? :confused: |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1145395)
Whatever gets you through the day and enable you to justify how vastly under compensated you are to most every SWA pilot.
Classic belief disconfirmation. Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:26 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands