Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Now I don't know the context here, however Facebook's privacy policy does state anything posted on Facebook is public domain. This from Facebook's privacy policy: "...Just like when you share information by email or elsewhere on the web, information you share on Facebook can be re-shared. This means that if you share something on Facebook, anyone who can see it can share it with others, including the games, applications, and websites they use...."
I understand taking the high ground, and posters should use discretion, but no reason to close a thread....
I understand taking the high ground, and posters should use discretion, but no reason to close a thread....
The picture in question was self edited, but the quotes were not. Be smart, we are less than a month away from openers, no one needs to invite anything on themselves. If limiting the damage means closing a thread, I will do it. The issue is resolved, but make sure that we do not have this sort of issue again. As long as we don't there is nothing to worry about. It is more about pilot liability than APC liability.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
There is more than enough "restoration" (or to be fair just profitable LCC parity) in pay, scope and equitable work rules like across the board trip/duty rigs, min day, sick and especially vacation time improvements, reserve rules and most importnatly scope for us to be spending one second of "negotiating capital" on the triple dip featherbedding stuff. That is, unless we are on the verge of getting it *all* back.
When someone had pictures that only "friends" can see and they post that picture, and said person has a serious issue with it, we have an issue. Point is do not post pictures that are not on a public site. Pictures of co-workers that are behind a mask of "friendship" do not qualify in my book nor hers. Point is, don't do it. Warning stands, we do not need to increase visibility or liability of any pilots that are on this thread.
The picture in question was self edited, but the quotes were not. Be smart, we are less than a month away from openers, no one needs to invite anything on themselves. If limiting the damage means closing a thread, I will do it. The issue is resolved, but make sure that we do not have this sort of issue again. As long as we don't there is nothing to worry about. It is more about pilot liability than APC liability.
The picture in question was self edited, but the quotes were not. Be smart, we are less than a month away from openers, no one needs to invite anything on themselves. If limiting the damage means closing a thread, I will do it. The issue is resolved, but make sure that we do not have this sort of issue again. As long as we don't there is nothing to worry about. It is more about pilot liability than APC liability.
Someone with a lizard on their avatar posted a picture that he lifted off his FAs Facebook page. She was wearing a swimsuit and wasn't too hard on the eyes.
Then Bar pointed out an "oddity" on the picture and ruined the mood.
Then ACL did some detective work and shut down the shenannigans, but not before Clamp figured out who she was and stalker-bid the month of April with her.
And the rest you can figure out reading the last three pages.
Then Bar pointed out an "oddity" on the picture and ruined the mood.
Then ACL did some detective work and shut down the shenannigans, but not before Clamp figured out who she was and stalker-bid the month of April with her.
And the rest you can figure out reading the last three pages.
Nope, no idea. Period. In fact a non-mod brought up EK and the opportunities overseas. I had a discussion with him on it that took place on this thread.
Someone with a lizard on their avatar posted a picture that he lifted off his FAs Facebook page. She was wearing a swimsuit and wasn't too hard on the eyes.
Then Bar pointed out an "oddity" on the picture and ruined the mood.
Then ACL did some detective work and shut down the shenannigans, but not before Clamp figured out who she was and stalker-bid the month of April with her.
And the rest you can figure out reading the last three pages.
Then Bar pointed out an "oddity" on the picture and ruined the mood.
Then ACL did some detective work and shut down the shenannigans, but not before Clamp figured out who she was and stalker-bid the month of April with her.
And the rest you can figure out reading the last three pages.
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
I like the buckets and wish they were larger. I'm junior reserve and commute. Prior to the bucket system I was not flying at all, now I fly every time I'm on call. Hope its not a fluke. Beats sitting SC at a hotel or a crashpad. Seniority should have its perks. You must live in base.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: DL 7ER F/O
Posts: 249
A past CEO at a in command briefing stated several times he had no problem paying a 777 CA 500 dollars an hour. He said the revenue generation of the airframe could support it. He then however went on to state that if he paid that we would demand 400 an hour on a 737 which could not support it. I don't remember the exact numbers but a 777 CA generated about 3 and a half times the total revenue of a 737 CA when you factored in the airfares and cargo. They had all the numbers available for each aircraft and they were eye watering on the difference in revenue generation between airframes.
Last edited by johnso29; 03-06-2012 at 08:33 PM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: erb
Posts: 646
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Originally Posted by Jesse
Yes, it should have its perks, and smaller buckets would still provide plenty of that. Perks are good, but running roughshod over your fellow pilots so you can sit home all month is more than a perk--it's an abusive system.
That said. The first bucket should stop at 60. =)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post