Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2012 | 11:47 AM
  #93911  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Exactly, and the fleet count is about 30-something jets shy of the 767 anyway, so it would be years before a change could increase it.

Plus the company already has agreements in place at other airlines to fly those 70 seat birds so not so easy to dump them, just to have to buy a new jet that has 6 more seats.... Not a very good business decision IMHO.
I agree that the ROI is not there to trade in a CR-7 for a CR-9, but to trade them in for a C-series flow by us would be very smart!

Also point of clarification, the CR7 is now dual class and has 66 seats so it is a gain of 10.
Old 03-27-2012 | 11:50 AM
  #93912  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite

Wondering why more 777's? Great airplane and I'd love to see them, but what's the need and why not 330's? Is this the beginning of the NRT overfly 'strategy'?
Why is "strategy" in quotes? Overflying NRT when the markets dictate that doing so will increase revenue is good business. I have always found the fNWA guys' lovefest with the 787 somewhat amusing because that is EXACTLY what that airplane will do.. and sooner than if we were to buy a similar number of 777s. But to the other part of your question, why not 777s? Longer range, more capacity, etc etc etc... and it's a Boeing
Old 03-27-2012 | 11:51 AM
  #93913  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
So, to get from 718 up to 768, they only need to pick up 50 of the AT 717's, and then what happens if they get more than that?

Is it still at 3-1? If they got an additional ten 717's, do they get 30 more RJ's??

Or is 255 76 seat RJ's a hard cap, regardless of mainine fleet size?

And then what happens if later, if the mainline fleet shrinks? Do RJ's go down at 3 to 1?
They get to keep the 76 'rs. Get 717's, hold on to the DC9 until they can convert the remaining 70 to 76 seaters, and then the company can (and will) go as low on the mainline as they like

We could see a lot more NB flying go away with section 1 as written
Old 03-27-2012 | 11:53 AM
  #93914  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I agree that the ROI is not there to trade in a CR-7 for a CR-9, but to trade them in for a C-series flow by us would be very smart!

Also point of clarification, the CR7 is now dual class and has 66 seats so it is a gain of 10.
Ya know, there is a good article on flightaware that might be enlightening WRT the Unicorn jet. It makes the case that the legacy mfgs. are playing hardball defending turf against the boys from brazil and the canucks, and the segment is by no means defined.
Old 03-27-2012 | 11:56 AM
  #93915  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Why is "strategy" in quotes? Overflying NRT when the markets dictate that doing so will increase revenue is good business. I have always found the fNWA guys' lovefest with the 787 somewhat amusing because that is EXACTLY what that airplane will do.. and sooner than if we were to buy a similar number of 777s. But to the other part of your question, why not 777s? Longer range, more capacity, etc etc etc... and it's a Boeing
I suggest you ask around how much of our Pacific traffic is Japan O&D. We could lose significant Pacific traffic and flying without that traffic. Some routes can support direct on a 787, some a 777, but we still need the NRT/HND O&D
Old 03-27-2012 | 11:59 AM
  #93916  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Why is "strategy" in quotes? Overflying NRT when the markets dictate that doing so will increase revenue is good business. I have always found the fNWA guys' lovefest with the 787 somewhat amusing because that is EXACTLY what that airplane will do.. and sooner than if we were to buy a similar number of 777s. But to the other part of your question, why not 777s? Longer range, more capacity, etc etc etc... and it's a Boeing
WHOAH, pump the brakes T! Not FNWA myself, but I'll take that as a compliment! . You did pick up on the quotes. I did beg the question. Where else in our system do we need the capacity and range? If this were true, I'm just wondering what the plan would be for those airframes... always thought we should have more of them though, great plane.

I don't see it as a 747 replacement, yet, even the 777-300, we are still finding good use for the whales.

Why not 777 ?
Pricey, a330 cheaper.
More airframes= more routes or airplanes to the desert. Maybe we are just upgauging.

Do we still have Boeing over a barrel WRT the 787 deliveries? Could explain some recent and future orders

Last edited by flyallnite; 03-27-2012 at 12:10 PM. Reason: Brain hurts
Old 03-27-2012 | 12:09 PM
  #93917  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
I suggest you ask around how much of our Pacific traffic is Japan O&D. We could lose significant Pacific traffic and flying without that traffic. Some routes can support direct on a 787, some a 777, but we still need the NRT/HND O&D
I never said that NRT was not needed. I can see it becoming less significant as the point to point US to China markets are developed. that is probably why there are only 18 787s on order. I don't see it becoming much bigger than that..
Old 03-27-2012 | 12:13 PM
  #93918  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
WHOAH, pump the brakes T! Not FNWA myself, but I'll take that as a compliment! . You did pick up on the quotes. I did beg the question. Where else in our system do we need the capacity and range? If this were true, I'm just wondering what the plan would be for those airframes... always thought we should have more of them though, great plane.

I don't see it as a 747 replacement, yet, even the 777-300, we are still finding good use for the whales.
I was in NRT last April, about a month after the big earth quake. I don't know how much the NRT traffic has recovered since then, but at that time, according to some of the BKK F/A's I spoke with, their loads were very light. As in 100 people, in a big 4 engine jet.

I hope the loads in and out of NRT have recovered by now. I haven't been out that way in several months, maybe Carl can tell us what's going on, load wise, with the Whale flying. I did see somewhere that come summer, they plan to put it back on ATL-NRT, which will free up a 777 for somewhere else. There was a rumor they were going to add a second Dubai flight, 3 days per week, but later Anil said no. And Anil knows everything. I'll just ask him in a few days when I'm over there.
Old 03-27-2012 | 12:14 PM
  #93919  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
WHOAH, pump the brakes T! Not FNWA myself, but I'll take that as a compliment! . You did pick up on the quotes. I did beg the question. Where else in our system do we need the capacity and range? If this were true, I'm just wondering what the plan would be for those airframes... always thought we should have more of them though, great plane.

I don't see it as a 747 replacement, yet, even the 777-300, we are still finding good use for the whales.

Why not 777 ?
Pricey, a330 cheaper.
More airframes= more routes or airplanes to the desert. Maybe we are just upgauging.

Do we still have Boeing over a barrel WRT the 787 deliveries? Could explain some recent and future orders
Didn't say you were fNWA... I said that they have a lovefest with the 787.

As to the A330 vs 777. Airbus (yuck) vs Boeing (yay) nuff said.

I think the whales will be around awhile until oil hits a certain point, then they become expensive. I have no idea what that point is, but the 777s can carry almost as much a lot farther, so the roles of the 747s could be diminished to hub to hub stuff or maybe charter.. I dunno..

I just hope we get a change of command in November and we can get on with the business of running the country the way it was meant to be run.
Old 03-27-2012 | 12:16 PM
  #93920  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I was in NRT last April, about a month after the big earth quake. I don't know how much the NRT traffic has recovered since then, but at that time, according to some of the BKK F/A's I spoke with, their loads were very light. As in 100 people, in a big 4 engine jet.

I hope the loads in and out of NRT have recovered by now. I haven't been out that way in several months, maybe Carl can tell us what's going on, load wise, with the Whale flying. I did see somewhere that come summer, they plan to put it back on ATL-NRT, which will free up a 777 for somewhere else. There was a rumor they were going to add a second Dubai flight, 3 days per week, but later Anil said no. And Anil knows everything. I'll just ask him in a few days when I'm over there.
So it is really Anil that is running DAL then.. now it all makes sense.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices