Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Going back a number of pages to the LCA meeting notes, someone mentioned the companies projection in the next few years is 2.5-3 Billion a year in profits! That's double what we're doing right now. It's time that more of the profits that Delta makes finds it's way into our pockets.
I agree, after AMR settles the US will have 4 large airlines and a few smaller ones.
I agree, after AMR settles the US will have 4 large airlines and a few smaller ones.
Going back a number of pages to the LCA meeting notes, someone mentioned the companies projection in the next few years is 2.5-3 Billion a year in profits! That's double what we're doing right now. It's time that more of the profits that Delta makes finds it's way into our pockets.
I agree, after AMR settles the US will have 4 large airlines and a few smaller ones.
I agree, after AMR settles the US will have 4 large airlines and a few smaller ones.
Also JV's and Code Share input on every deal with a manadarory production balance on any deal is logical for all parties. We need holding company protections and wording protecting us from a transnational transaction are mins. SJS needs a logical drawdown to logically return flying to the mainline and recapture true brand control. Structure the debt how you want but DAL employees are the only way to have true product control.
I called IT, they had nothing. They said there are no current known issues with IE or Firefox. I have Firefox 3.6 and 11, both are giving it to me--constant disconnect/resets of DeltaNet and thus also Icrew. Windows 7. No downloads except the automatic windows updates. All cache and cookies cleared repeatedly, doesn't help. Like you, I can't even put in a PCS bid! It's terrible. It's obviously a problem, but my impression was that Delta was NOT taking my call as a data point to identify problems and fix them... I don't know how they ever expect to have a "known problem and fix" if they don't even ASK me to describe my issue and type a bit of data down...
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
This is interesting. Apparently other creditors think DAL providing DIP financing to Pinnacle should not be allowed.
http://dm.epiq11.com/PinnacleAirline...cument/1734794
http://dm.epiq11.com/PinnacleAirline...cument/1734794
For the same reason every MEC brings a TA, they think it is the best they can do.
That doesn't bother me.
What bothers me is the sales job where everything is roses and concessions are downplayed. This is where being your own best expert is important...If you dont read it how can you know if its better or not?
That doesn't bother me.
What bothers me is the sales job where everything is roses and concessions are downplayed. This is where being your own best expert is important...If you dont read it how can you know if its better or not?
Ahhhh. The sales job. It was particularly a hard sell during BK, wasn't it? Never forget a particular 44 rep and his feverent lounge shows where they were occasionally over the decorum line.
If I remember correctly, for POS 96, there were official pro-con papers put out by DALPA. Then the policy manual was changed at some point in time to do away with the con paper. For C2K, an industrious individual worked dilligently and put one out comparing the contract gains (green print) with give aways or losses in red.
I would love to get a copy of it now. Mickley, you out there??
Anyway, this time around, 12 years later, I am not sure we need a "sanctioned con paper' as we have this. The internet, mass communication on an instant scale, and the one thing that really scares DALPA, the might APC. This is one forum they can't pull the plug on as BH threatens to do to the DALPA forum. Look at what social media what did for Arab Spring.
So, point being, there will be the sales job and they will be out in force promoting it. They will most definitely be here constantly hitting there talking points. But, I don't think it will have the same impact as it had before.
And instead of waiting weeks for pro-con papers, the debate and dissection of the TA will be instant.
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Just talked to them....because the trip is one day longer and comes back on a day that reserves required = reserves available they deny it. Every other day of the trip has mega reserves available. I'd be operating a trip that essentially alleviates them of possibly one reserve being called and its denied. Whudda thunk?
I think they are 'Tools', but what's new?
Tomorrow at 9am, call DALPA scheds guys, see if they can help.
And remember, common sense is an uncommon commodity...
This is interesting. Apparently other creditors think DAL providing DIP financing to Pinnacle should not be allowed.
http://dm.epiq11.com/PinnacleAirline...cument/1734794
http://dm.epiq11.com/PinnacleAirline...cument/1734794
They always cut to the chase and allows you to turn around and say "but, but I thought you said..."
It's almost as much fun as match the criminal with the item they stole!
TIME WASTER | The Smoking Gun
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,888
I would say cover both bases by typing "Hear Here" But since you asked.
Scoop
Hear Hear or Here Here?
So today I found myself agreeing with someone online and went to type “hear hear” but then remembered seeing someone else type “here here” a couple days earlier.
I was pretty sure the correct phrase was “hear hear” as opposed to the other variants I'd seen (“here here”, “hear here”, “here hear”) but I'd never actually looked it up. So I decided to check popular internet usage using Google:
- “hear hear” = 1,740,000 hits
- “here here” = 3,880,000 hits
- “hear here” = 307,000 hits
- “here hear” = 334,000 hits
Hear hear (Wikipedia):
…Hear, hear is an expression used as a short repeated form of hear ye and hear him. It represents a listener's agreement with the point being made by a speaker.
It was originally an imperative for directing attention to speakers, and has since been used, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, as “the regular form of cheering in the House of Commons”, with many purposes depending on the intonation of its user. It is often incorrectly spelled “here here”, especially on websites…
A quick double check of OneLook Dictionary Search confirms this. Six dictionaries list “hear hear” and only one lists “here here” (and that one happens to be the wiki article above.)…Hear, hear is an expression used as a short repeated form of hear ye and hear him. It represents a listener's agreement with the point being made by a speaker.
It was originally an imperative for directing attention to speakers, and has since been used, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, as “the regular form of cheering in the House of Commons”, with many purposes depending on the intonation of its user. It is often incorrectly spelled “here here”, especially on websites…
Popular usage drives the movement of meaning, though, so at some point in the future “here here” may end up being the correct phrase if we don't do something about it.
So if you want to avoid yet another English colloquialism that will have your great grandchildren scratching their heads and saying “***?” (or whatever kids will be saying in those days) then type “hear hear” at every opportunity.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post