DAL Poolie Info
#5781
Swimmer
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: A300 FO, C-130 Pilot
Out of the 12 26 May CGOs, do we know how many have been e-mailed for 19 Jan? I know of at least 4 who have not been contacted (me included). Far as I know, the last to be emailed was a 4xxx SSN. Can anyone confirm this?
#5782
#5783
New Hire
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Indoctee
I might be the anchor of the 26 May group with a 3xxx SSN.
Got the email late Thursday afternoon. Filled out the info sheet and sent back that day. Didn't hear anything back from DAL by 1430 Friday so I called and left a voicemail. They called back within 15 minutes to confirm that my email was received and I would be getting a "logistics packet sometime next week".
Got the email late Thursday afternoon. Filled out the info sheet and sent back that day. Didn't hear anything back from DAL by 1430 Friday so I called and left a voicemail. They called back within 15 minutes to confirm that my email was received and I would be getting a "logistics packet sometime next week".
#5784
Swimmer
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: A300 FO, C-130 Pilot
I might be the anchor of the 26 May group with a 3xxx SSN.
Got the email late Thursday afternoon. Filled out the info sheet and sent back that day. Didn't hear anything back from DAL by 1430 Friday so I called and left a voicemail. They called back within 15 minutes to confirm that my email was received and I would be getting a "logistics packet sometime next week".
Got the email late Thursday afternoon. Filled out the info sheet and sent back that day. Didn't hear anything back from DAL by 1430 Friday so I called and left a voicemail. They called back within 15 minutes to confirm that my email was received and I would be getting a "logistics packet sometime next week".
#5785
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Heavies
I'm pretty sure there is a 7xxx who hasn't been called.
#5786
Crap. So if there's a "7xxx" who has NOT been called, and it's confirmed that a "3xxx" HAS been called from the same CJO group, does that mean they found something bad during the background check on the "7xxx"? (Assuming the 7-guy still wants the job/didn't give a TBNT.)
Man, that would suck...
Man, that would suck...
#5787
On Reserve
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Drying off
Crap. So if there's a "7xxx" who has NOT been called, and it's confirmed that a "3xxx" HAS been called from the same CJO group, does that mean they found something bad during the background check on the "7xxx"? (Assuming the 7-guy still wants the job/didn't give a TBNT.)
Man, that would suck...
Man, that would suck...
#5788
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: 320A
-JD
#5789
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 814
Likes: 27
From: Wind checker
Crap. So if there's a "7xxx" who has NOT been called, and it's confirmed that a "3xxx" HAS been called from the same CJO group, does that mean they found something bad during the background check on the "7xxx"? (Assuming the 7-guy still wants the job/didn't give a TBNT.)
Man, that would suck...
Man, that would suck...
#5790
New Hire
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: P-3C IP
Could mean that the person's email or phone changed and Delta didn't get the change. We are dealing with a bureaucracy after all. I don't see an issue with an email or phone call asking for an update if you think THE CALL could have or should have arrived by now if others in your group are getting the nod.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



