Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2015 | 05:27 AM
  #3161  
Karnak's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker
I think the saying is "make hay when the sun shines."
It's shining brightly so it's time to be rewarded for the last decade of rain.
I agree. There's no question the timing is good for us to make some hefty gains.

I also don't think there's any question that most of us remember how short-lived the hefty gains were in the last decade. We survive as pilots because we don't trust everything to be hunky dory all the time. With C2015, how cautious or how aggressive we should be is not up to any one of us. It's up to all of us. In the end, if ALPA is too cautious, our ratification vote will make that clear. I'm ok with that.
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 06:22 AM
  #3162  
Schwanker's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
I agree. There's no question the timing is good for us to make some hefty gains.

I also don't think there's any question that most of us remember how short-lived the hefty gains were in the last decade. We survive as pilots because we don't trust everything to be hunky dory all the time. With C2015, how cautious or how aggressive we should be is not up to any one of us. It's up to all of us. In the end, if ALPA is too cautious, our ratification vote will make that clear. I'm ok with that.
We voted our reps in to make historic gains. Not give us some weak TA and tell the membership, "well if you don't like it, vote no." I'm not ok with that.
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 06:32 AM
  #3163  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker
We voted our reps in to make historic gains. Not give us some weak TA and tell the membership, "well if you don't like it, vote no." I'm not ok with that.
The MEC administration does the same thing to the reps.
That's what happened in 2012.

They bring back a lousy TA and then say "you can always vote no, but here's why that would be the end of the world".
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 06:37 AM
  #3164  
Schwanker's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
The MEC administration does the same thing to the reps.
That's what happened in 2012.

They bring back a lousy TA and then say "you can always vote no, but here's why that would be the end of the world".
Exactly. They need to know loud and clear that crap tactic is unacceptable.
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 07:43 AM
  #3165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
And that my friends, is how concessions get sold during times of record profits.
No, that's why it makes sense to monetize the profit sharing if it's above and beyond the negotiated payrates. In my case it's probably better to stick with profit sharing with the few years I have left. If however i had 20 years to go I would want the money in the payrates.
"The industry is fundamentally changed. Double digit rate of returns are hear to stay!" That was the Mantra being touted by management and unions alike in 2000. By June of 2001 the airlines were facing some of the biggest losses ever. It turned in the blink of a eye. For the young guys we need to be very careful how much at risk based compensation we leave in our contracts. It would be beyond stupid to negotiate based on good times forever.
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 08:01 AM
  #3166  
Karnak's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
The MEC administration does the same thing to the reps.
That's what happened in 2012.

They bring back a lousy TA and then say "you can always vote no, but here's why that would be the end of the world".
Some of our reps voted No to the C2012 TA. Then they advised us to vote No, and told us why.

Did you think voting No would be the end of the world? I didn't.

Exaggerating the tone of the advice we got during the ratification of C2012 sounds like sour grapes.
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 08:04 AM
  #3167  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
No, that's why it makes sense to monetize the profit sharing if it's above and beyond the negotiated payrates.
And I'm saying it will never be "above and beyond". It will be something less.

Its very transparent what is happening here.

DALPA is going to try and get us to fund part of our own pay raises.
We're not going to fall for it this time.
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 08:09 AM
  #3168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
And I'm saying it will never be "above and beyond". It will be something less.

Its very transparent what is happening here.

DALPA is going to try and get us to fund part of our own pay raises.
We're not going to fall for it this time.
I have asked this question several times here and never been given a answer. Why on earth would our reps and negotiating committee have some sort of plan to limit contractual gains? Why would they want to pay themselves less and work more?
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 08:33 AM
  #3169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have asked this question several times here and never been given a answer. Why on earth would our reps and negotiating committee have some sort of plan to limit contractual gains? Why would they want to pay themselves less and work more?
1 They like working for less.
2 They like working more.
3 They don't ever want to retire.
4 They don't ever plan to be sick.
5 They don't believe in vacation.
6 None of them ever return to the line.
7 They are all going to get SD's job.
8 They are all secretly bought off.
9 Lee and Tim told them to.
10 RA used his hypnotic powers on them.

I could be wrong about number 10 as the committees usually wear aluminum foil on their heads during negotiations. OFG
Reply
Old 01-10-2015 | 08:36 AM
  #3170  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have asked this question several times here and never been given a answer. Why on earth would our reps and negotiating committee have some sort of plan to limit contractual gains? Why would they want to pay themselves less and work more?
My opinion is that some sort of modified "Stockholm Syndrome" or "Kool-Aid" scenario occurs. The line between management and union fades creating a cohesive relationship thus mildly diluting contractual gains while fortifying management goals. (after all dont most union guys end up in management positions?)

TEN
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices