Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

sailingfun 06-09-2015 05:22 PM


Originally Posted by Vikz09 (Post 1899953)
This directed at Professor.

Only reduces profit sharing in 2016... AND BEYOND. That is a 10% savings to the company on the difference. The difference is 3.5 billion, therefore, the company saves 350 million in profit sharing to the employee group. ( do you see how this is cost neutral yet?) Sure the pilots share is a third or 117 million but along with all these other goodies this is cost neutral!

By 1 JAN 17 the base pay plus DC will be up almost 19%. There is at least another 2% in additional soft money and it's probably higher.(increased vacation and training, shortcall pay, vacation to PD, new reroute rules ect.)
That total 12 months past the amendable date will be somewhere in the 450 million range.

LeineLodge 06-09-2015 05:22 PM


Originally Posted by Cogf16 (Post 1899944)
With regards to the JV concessions, why would we settle for "that's not so bad" with one of the biggest sections in our contract???? Don't they EVER listen to us????? DON'T TOUCH PS OR SCOPE!!!!!!!
FAIL. VOTE NO!!!

Similar to what 80 said, I had our codeshare committee chairman explain that part to me earlier. I highly respect his opinion as he has lived these numbers in greater detail that I ever want to - by "not so bad" I meant that it seemed more or less the same result as what we currently have, just a different metric to measure the same flying. Part of the rationale was that as we upguage to 330's from ER's some of the EASK deficit would go away, and also something about how we augment and the euros don't. I'm not willing to write that section off until I understand it better.

This is all moot if the reps don't ratify it. We'll see tomorrow if they even get through all the material - which they had barely begun to do this afternoon by 6pm...

sailingfun 06-09-2015 05:26 PM


Originally Posted by Flying Elvis (Post 1899921)
I don't know how this is locking in more mainline flying. These 100-seaters could be growth, but I'd place my bets on them being replacements for MDs, 320s, and maybe even a few 73s. Meanwhile, we allow 25 more aircraft with DAL paint but not DAL pilots.

It's a concession.

Would not the increase in the Block hour ratio prevent that? The current requirement is 1.35 and the company is at 1.55. They have to go up to 1.85 per the TA.

EdGrimley 06-09-2015 05:28 PM

For those who haven't followed the marketing material being disseminated on Twitter/Facebook, here are some of nuggets you will likely hear over and over below.

Notice as you read through FB and Twitter, hardly one iota mentioning downside. Just cherry picking and putting some nice spin. Sorry to use this word but it's DB at it's worst and the wrong way for a respectable union to lead.

Do the words of Mike Donatelli reconcile with the TA you are seeing? Are his words accurate and honest? Or are they just marketing hype similar to what Ford and Harrison would put out? Does anybody honestly think this TA in any way resembles the input given through the contract survey? How about the fear of what will happen if we don't accept what was offered? This is not leadership. This is the mouthpiece of management.

MD: Opportunity. I have said it many times. Opportunity to once and for all, turn the corner and never look back,makes certain our futures.

MD: The best combination of Pay rates and Profit Sharing, The Best Scope. The Best work rules. All at a growing airline. A growing mainline.

MD: (see chart) While there are lots of stories here, the main takeaway is that we must GET…and STAY…synched to our airline.

MD: From the JCBA to Contract 2012, we stayed true to our mission…to find value anywhere, anyhow…to keep the raises coming.

MD: We formulated a strategic plan. We asked our pilots about a new contract. Your reps put the plan in motion.

MD: We have a deal on the table. A contract that sets a new standard. Raises the bar across the board. Pushes beyond Industry Leading.

MD: Restoration? How about Resurgent? A resurgence of the Delta Pilots and a resurgence of the profession.

MD:You told us what you wanted in surveys&on the phone.You told us that you like the direction we’re going together.You said “Keep it Going”

MD: Contract 2012 delivered on what it was supposed to do…to increase pay and job opportunities for the Delta pilots.

MD: So back to present day…This Deal on the table is so much more that 2012. Imagine what this will mean to Delta pilots and their families.

MD: I often hear the terms “Member Driven”, and “Bottoms Up” when describing what we do. Well, it’s time to Walk the Walk, not Talk the Talk

MD: To be perfectly clear, These are mature negotiations in which we pulled every trigger, fired every bullet, to deliver every last penny.

MD: The idea that we can simple resume negotiations…go back to the table and pick up where we left off is a fallacy. It simply won’t happen.

MD: The next step if we can’t move forward right here and right now is to step back and prepare for a long slog with the NMB....

MD:.... Just like FedEx. Just like Southwest. Our fate will be in the government’s hands.

MEC: The 14.48% pay raise can be viewed as an 8.74% pay raise + a 5.74% conversion of “at-risk” profit sharing into a “no-risk” increase in pay

MEC: This converted 5.74% of variable compensation to fixed compensation in hourly pay rates - assumes DAL achieves $6.0+ billion every year...

MEC: The TA maintained no cap on profit sharing.

MD:This TA will redefine getting PAID as an airline pilot. Before any change to profit sharing, it is ABOVE C2K Rates"


TOTALLY MEANINGLESS and an insult to the intelligence of our pilot group.

sailingfun 06-09-2015 05:30 PM


Originally Posted by LeineLodge (Post 1899960)
Similar to what 80 said, I had our codeshare committee chairman explain that part to me earlier. I highly respect his opinion as he has lived these numbers in greater detail that I ever want to - by "not so bad" I meant that it seemed more or less the same result as what we currently have, just a different metric to measure the same flying. Part of the rationale was that as we upguage to 330's from ER's some of the EASK deficit would go away, and also something about how we augment and the euros don't. I'm not willing to write that section off until I understand it better.

This is all moot if the reps don't ratify it. We'll see tomorrow if they even get through all the material - which they had barely begun to do this afternoon by 6pm...

I was told the same thing by several reps. The new agreement preserves what we have and could end up better as we up guage the Atlantic flying and AF/KLM down guage as per their current fleet plans. I want to see the numbers to verify it but the reps seem to have no issue with this. They have issues in other areas but not this one.

Vikz09 06-09-2015 05:31 PM

You saying a 19% increase by 2017. Please do not forget we give up 117 million in PS. That happens in 2016. The soft money given back to the company in the form of work rule changes should more than offset any soft money gains too us. Very little to be excited about.

Broncos 06-09-2015 05:32 PM

Seriously considering dropping my ALPA lanyard in the first garbage bin I see at the airport tomorrow. I'm too new to be eligible to vote, so I hope the rest of you flush this TA Turd back where it belongs.

Cogf16 06-09-2015 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by Flamer (Post 1899950)
I'm in disbelief as well. In the best negotiating environment of the century we got a TA that is worse than the current contract. I'm in total disbelief right now. Speechless.

That's about as succinct as you can say it. Can I borrow those exact words to send to my Rep?

qball 06-09-2015 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1899917)
It was interesting what rumors came true and didn't.. pay banding (well the 350 pays the same as the whale that it's replacing as it should), green slip gone, and a lot of the other stuff didn't make it. Sick leave was in there, and the pay rates with traded PS were pretty dang close.

It was cool seeing all the APC types there today!

I went into this with fairly low expectations. They didn't disappoint me in that regard. Ideally, I want to be able to vote yes for an early deal.

Likes:
--Pay is... ok. It's another base hit, nothing more, and I don't mind the logic in trading profit sharing. (It's an airline, for petes sake... we're in the business of not making profit)
--Scope improvements- further locking in more mainline flying (despite allowing up to 25 more 76 seaters), tightened JV compliance window, and I agree with keeping VA out of the trans-atlantic metric, Republic carveout gone
--Individual vacation days
--Improved fragmentation language
--Hotels for newhires

Meh:
--Sick leave.... nothing good, nothing really worse than we have now.

Dislikes:
--TATL JV metric changed from equivalent seat kms to pilot block hours. That is a BIG deal- that means AF can add A380s on routes and that is considered the same as a 757 (or A321 in the future). With ESKs if they dropped an A380 onto a route, that was 2 767s that we had to add. The illustrious Bucking Bar tried to explain how this wasn't a bad thing, but it never hit home with me.
--Seattle STILL not a hub....
--TLV (transitive line value) max adjusted from 80 hours to 81 hours. Bye bye 100+ pilot jobs with that one.
--And this one may be the deal breaker for me: LCA trip buyoffs for OE. Up to 75% of trips that LCAs bid for will be pulled out of the FO's pot for bidding. That is a complete abrogation of seniority and totally screws up any FO bids of any seniority.

Take out the LCA thing and I'm probably a yes vote... I'm really having a hard time getting over that, though. That to me is something it may be worth it to send it back through the spin cycle another time.

Oh, and SharpestTool is taking a few days of vacation to see if he can play more nicely. If not, he can go the way of Lumberg.

I wish I had your confidence the E/190-195 will be growth airframes. Funny they never offer to buy widebodies if we give upper end scope relief.

Again...why are we even negotiating to trade scope for new small narrow bodies. If the company needs them, they will get them.

We help fix their self imposed DCI problems AGAIN with more large Rjs

Bounty Man 06-09-2015 05:40 PM

PS is worthless
 
The top 10 analyst in the US with decades of credibility are all saying the economic crash will occur between Oct 2015 and Jul 2016. To include a currency reset.
Don't you all get it, the profit sharing is toast. There won't be any profit sharing for years.
You need to send this back and negotiate hard dollars.
12-10-6-6 at minimum.
Read my lips....there will be NO profit sharing.
Analysts today and yesterday started down grading the airlines.
Can anybody understand we haven't even got to 2004 contract.
VOTE NO
Don't let the 60% weenies get this TA by.
The dalpa are robots. They will start their games by calling everyone within minutes of a post to sell youth BS just like they did last contract.
I was called twice within minutes of 2 post.
Don't fall for this BS.
VOTE NO
Tell your rep they will be recalled if they vote for this crap.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands