Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1899646)

The NMB also won't (can't) reduce our PS or impose the draconian scope concessions as well as the numerous other concessions. They don't have the power or the authority to do so. All they can do is park us under current book. I'd rather have that than this TA.

And even being parked is only if we're being "unreasonable" in what we're demanding. Not accepting concessions isn't being unreasonable. Keep current book and ask for lower raises and we won't be parked, we'll just have to wait out the typical 3 or so year timeline for bad faith company playbook negotiations. But all under current book with no concessions, huge PS and way more widebody JV jobs.

Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1899722)

I thought LCA were 20% of the group? Is it 10% or 20%, frightened minds want to know.

Originally Posted by Doug Masters (Post 1899736)

After briefing Mrs Masters on the TA she says "sounds like Carl and FTB would vote no. You should too." I shall take her advice. :) But how does she know you guys??? ;)

Originally Posted by Professor (Post 1899734)

There are numbers on this. Far less impact than you would think. In the road show slides.

Remember all LCA's aren't always doing OE.

More info to come from sources IF we get a TA.

Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1899582)

Before we lock-in 50% block hours, here's some actual DALPA Data on the JV for comparison:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...Brief%2001.png


Cheers
George

Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1899701)

Mole alert.

This guy has admitted he's not a Delta pilot.

Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1899722)

I thought LCA were 20% of the group? Is it 10% or 20%, frightened minds want to know.