Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:38 AM
  #8071  
Sounds's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
The MEC Chairman can approve... an international partner carrier.. to use the Delta livery, markings, brand name on their aircraft.

...So Virgin Atlantic or China Southern can call themselves Delta, and paint their aircraft as such, and sell tickets using our brand, simply by His approval. Shanghai hub makes a lot more sense now. We just won't be flying it!!!
That's interesting and I haven't heard that interpretation before. was that in the ta?

Regardless, I'd do whatever it took to get solid routes in China. Even if that means having JV in the short term.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:38 AM
  #8072  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,329
Likes: 818
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
It's not in the TA. So I cannot. To that end.

Please look at our current book for deliveries.

I'll revisit it if I have time. Promise.
It's not part of the TA.

You are actually doing a good job stating and restating facts of the TA. The problem is the TA. No matter how many times its said its still 8% for QOL concessions and out year cola. This is a shameful waste of this opportunity.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:42 AM
  #8073  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sounds
That's interesting and I haven't heard that interpretation before. was that in the ta?

Regardless, I'd do whatever it took to get solid routes in China. Even if that means having JV in the short term.
JVs are like taxes and toll roads though.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:44 AM
  #8074  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RetiredFTS
Where is this "red" section for all to read. Links would be great when discussing a source (but I'm not smart enough to execute this).
https://dal.alpa.org/DesktopModules/...d=0&TabId=2593

hope this helps.

Full amended language.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:45 AM
  #8075  
MikeF16's Avatar
Otto
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: Turkish Pile Driver
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
Would the new hire seat lock be retro active to new hires currently in their first year or to those hired after its signed?
Should it matter? Why is it bad if you're the one on the receiving end but ok if it's just a new guy? This provision stinks and we shouldn't throw future employees under the bus.

Looks like we traded 4 weeks of hotels for an extra year of new hire seat freeze. Who do you think won that battle? The hotels are an industry embarrassment, they were coming anyway. Why trade for something we were going to get anyway? As a guy with a SSN last 4 that starts with a 0 I think the proposed 2 year seat lock stinks. Because of some random factor of where I was born, I have to eat whatever nobody else in my new hire class wanted for 2 years?
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:46 AM
  #8076  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default SWAPA point of view.

This is from UBS:

The ugly: big labor ask coming
SWAPA (pilots union) leadership sees its members as ~12% underpaid relative to current DAL/AAL contracts, and ~20% underpaid relative to tentative agreement (TA) with DAL pilots that (if ratified) would raise base wage rates but scale back profit sharing. SWAPA leadership sees a 15% base wage increase with modestly higher profit-sharing as minimum to get a deal done, and believes management's expectation for an overall cost-neutral labor deal is unrealistic. Remuneration appears to be only
major sticking point with work-rules and growth appearing to be of secondary concern.

During C2012 many on this board were advocating waiting for SWAPA. They've waited 3 years and are already 12% behind us in total comp. FedEx and UPS, the other two carriers that have been consistently profitable and in negotiations haven't raised the bar either.

Why are they so delayed?
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:47 AM
  #8077  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
It's not part of the TA.

You are actually doing a good job stating and restating facts of the TA. The problem is the TA. No matter how many times its said its still 8% for QOL concessions and out year cola. This is a shameful waste of this opportunity.
I personally could care less about deliveries. I am personally offended (which is not an emotion that can be monetized) that the company issued a press release the day the TA was moved to MEMRAT with an IF::THEN statement with regards to airframes.

That is outside of the scope of this TA and it only muddies the waters with regards to presenting a contractual change to the pilot group.

That said, I will offer JV language and data as it is and as it is in a worst case. Because...that what a contract is for.

Again, I need some time because I'm collecting language from a few experts. Thanks.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:53 AM
  #8078  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,329
Likes: 818
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
This is from UBS:

The ugly: big labor ask coming
SWAPA (pilots union) leadership sees its members as ~12% underpaid relative to current DAL/AAL contracts, and ~20% underpaid relative to tentative agreement (TA) with DAL pilots that (if ratified) would raise base wage rates but scale back profit sharing. SWAPA leadership sees a 15% base wage increase with modestly higher profit-sharing as minimum to get a deal done, and believes management's expectation for an overall cost-neutral labor deal is unrealistic. Remuneration appears to be only
major sticking point with work-rules and growth appearing to be of secondary concern.

During C2012 many on this board were advocating waiting for SWAPA. They've waited 3 years and are already 12% behind us in total comp. FedEx and UPS, the other two carriers that have been consistently profitable and in negotiations haven't raised the bar either.

Why are they so delayed?
How many on this board were advocates for c2012 stating this gets us to negotiations during the upcoming sweet spot in 2015, where we will make even greater gains? Hmmm. Or said SWA wasn't part of the 'me too' clause because they weren't our peers?
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:54 AM
  #8079  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
This is from UBS:

The ugly: big labor ask coming
SWAPA (pilots union) leadership sees its members as ~12% underpaid relative to current DAL/AAL contracts, and ~20% underpaid relative to tentative agreement (TA) with DAL pilots that (if ratified) would raise base wage rates but scale back profit sharing. SWAPA leadership sees a 15% base wage increase with modestly higher profit-sharing as minimum to get a deal done, and believes management's expectation for an overall cost-neutral labor deal is unrealistic. Remuneration appears to be only
major sticking point with work-rules and growth appearing to be of secondary concern.

During C2012 many on this board were advocating waiting for SWAPA. They've waited 3 years and are already 12% behind us in total comp. FedEx and UPS, the other two carriers that have been consistently profitable and in negotiations haven't raised the bar either.

Why are they so delayed?
Rhetorical, or are you soliciting opinions?
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 11:57 AM
  #8080  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Why are they so delayed?
Because SWAPA hasn't yet rolled over and accepted a substandard TA during the most advantageous labor bargaining position in decades.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices