Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2015 | 06:28 PM
  #8241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Professor,

Could you explain this one when you get a chance?

1.E.9.

The Delta MEC Chairman may, at his option, approve the use by a carrier engaged in international partner flying of a trade name, brand, logo, trademarks, service marks, aircraft livery or aircraft paint scheme currently or in the future utilized by the Company or any Company affiliate.


Where did that come from? And why?
I think pretty much before Delta could have a foreign partner and paint the planes like Delta planes and act like it's Delta. Now they can't unless the MEC approves it. This is a gain.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 06:34 PM
  #8242  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,327
Likes: 818
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
I think pretty much before Delta could have a foreign partner and paint the planes like Delta planes and act like it's Delta. Now they can't unless the MEC approves it. This is a gain.
I don't see that discretion in the current scope. They may need that for thier new Asian acquisition. Codeshare an JV maybe but not Delta branding and paint.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 06:34 PM
  #8243  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

I see that we changed 3.B.4. to include profit sharing in our hourly rate to compare against AA and United. So .55 is the only raise that we will ever trigger under that protection.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 06:39 PM
  #8244  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I don't see that discretion in the current scope. They may need that for thier new Asian acquisition.
I think our current scope allows them to do it whenever management wants to do it. You don't see the discretion because it's not prohibited. Now they need to ask our permission. This is a gain because they have to ask first and we have the right to say no. Before they could just do it and we had no recourse.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 06:40 PM
  #8245  
Cubdrick's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: #41
Default

Originally Posted by boog123
I think those that commute would lose at least 1 1/2 day off and the additional hotel costs. There is a reason these "little" things changed and it's not for your benefit.

Don't worry, ERflyer will comp your room with his extra $50k.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 06:48 PM
  #8246  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,327
Likes: 818
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
I think our current scope allows them to do it whenever management wants to do it. You don't see the discretion because it's not prohibited. Now they need to ask our permission. This is a gain because they have to ask first and we have the right to say no. Before they could just do it and we had no recourse.
Reading the current 1.E. it doesn't allow it. Delta branding. 1.C.2.d. prohibits it. The new TA gives Mike Donatelli that authority. Why the change?
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 07:08 PM
  #8247  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
I see that we changed 3.B.4. to include profit sharing in our hourly rate to compare against AA and United. So .55 is the only raise that we will ever trigger under that protection.
Unless this gets voted down....
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 07:11 PM
  #8248  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Okay, this conversation is degenerating and not conducive to spirited debate.

Please take it elsewhere.

Denny
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 07:13 PM
  #8249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Reading the current 1.E. it doesn't allow it. Delta branding. 1.C.2.d. prohibits it. The new TA gives Mike Donatelli that authority. Why the change?
You missed the first sentence of 1E:

Section 1 C. will not apply to international partner flying under Section 1 E.

This new language provides that same protection for international partner flying on the discretion of the MEC. This is a gain.
Reply
Old 06-12-2015 | 07:14 PM
  #8250  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

This may have been posted already. But if you are on Facebook, join this group:

Delta Pilots Against Contract 2015 TA

350+ joins in less than 2days. Just sayin.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices