Details on Delta TA

Reply Subscribe

Page 826 of 1030

826

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-12-2015 | 07:19 PM

#8251

ImTumbleweed

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 328

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bananie

I think our current scope allows them to do it whenever management wants to do it. You don't see the discretion because it's not prohibited. Now they need to ask our permission. This is a gain because they have to ask first and we have the right to say no. Before they could just do it and we had no recourse.

Deleted....filler

06-12-2015 | 07:21 PM

#8252

Cubdrick

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 283

Likes: 0

From: #41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Professor

No smaller aircraft in our fleet now or in the future can even do JFK to Europe.

75s fly JFK-DKR. It is feasible to see 75s start flying the traditionally ER served routes or take the 764 LHR flying. Can the 739 or A-321 fly those legs?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

06-12-2015 | 07:28 PM

#8253

forgot to bid

veut gagner à la loterie

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 23,286

Likes: 0

From: Light Chop

Cubdrick, if I ever meet you, I'm going to be disappointed if you don't look like your avatar picture.

06-12-2015 | 07:28 PM

#8254

cornbeef007

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2010

Posts: 857

Likes: 0

From: Representing the REAL Delta

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cubdrick

75s fly JFK-DKR. It is feasible to see 75s start flying the traditionally ER served routes or take the 764 LHR flying. Can the 739 or A-321 fly those legs?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sounds like the 737max would be able to.

06-12-2015 | 07:30 PM

#8255

slowplay

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 2,539

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cubdrick

75s fly JFK-DKR. It is feasible to see 75s start flying the traditionally ER served routes or take the 764 LHR flying. Can the 739 or A-321 fly those legs?

Neither the A321 or B739 in Delta's configuration have the range even empty to do JFK-LHR eastbound. On a VFR day the 739 might be able to do KEF (5+45). Westbound would be daily technical stops.

06-12-2015 | 07:30 PM

#8256

notEnuf

Racketeer

Joined: Mar 2015

Posts: 13,327

Likes: 818

From: N60.4858 W149.9327

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bananie

You missed the first sentence of 1E:

Section 1 C. will not apply to international partner flying under Section 1 E.

This new language provides that same protection for international partner flying on the discretion of the MEC. This is a gain.

Thanks, does the 1.C.3. requirement need full MEC approval (19 member or majority) versus MEC chairman discretion? Or are they to be read as the same requirement?

Last edited by notEnuf; 06-12-2015 at 07:48 PM.

06-12-2015 | 07:47 PM

#8257

forgot to bid

veut gagner à la loterie

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 23,286

Likes: 0

From: Light Chop

Scambo1, instead of a Cessna 150 example you should use a Cessna 182 as an example because this particular registration number is the most appropriate :

06-12-2015 | 07:47 PM

#8258

80ktsClamp

Da Hudge

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 17,473

Likes: 0

From: Poodle Whisperer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cubdrick

75s fly JFK-DKR. It is feasible to see 75s start flying the traditionally ER served routes or take the 764 LHR flying. Can the 739 or A-321 fly those legs?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The 321NEO-LR will be able to do those.