![]() |
Originally Posted by gopher3
(Post 1903766)
But Jerry, how could that be....many of our leaders all graduated from the same highly esteemed institution. A highly respected institution with core values of "Integrity First, Service Before Self, and Excellence in All We Do."
Just to name a few.... MEC Chairman Shadow MEC Chairman Chairman of Negotiating Committee SVP of Flight OPS MEC treasurer Several Yes voting Reps Actually, that's telling. Those that fly on that list, not many as you named basically all penguins, likely wear long sleeve shirts when they do. That's a slogan you posted. Not how any of them conduct themselves, particularly now. |
Originally Posted by Bananie
(Post 1903756)
Maybe because since bankruptcy, my pay has gone up about $90,000 per year and this TA will add another $50,000 or so. Meanwhile, the rest of the industry is simply riding on our shoulders. That's reason number one.
Nonsense. You salesmen want to pretend the profit sharing reduction is not happening. |
Originally Posted by gopher3
(Post 1903766)
But Jerry, how could that be....many of our leaders all graduated from the same highly esteemed institution. A highly respected institution with core values of "Integrity First, Service Before Self, and Excellence in All We Do."
Just to name a few.... MEC Chairman Shadow MEC Chairman Chairman of Negotiating Committee SVP of Flight OPS MEC treasurer Several Yes voting Reps |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1903777)
Show us how a single 8% hourly increase gets you $50,000.
Nonsense. You salesmen want to pretend the profit sharing reduction is not happening. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1903729)
There's nothing to email your rep about anymore. All you can do now is vote no. I'm not sure where you are based, but I emailed all my base reps numerous times when the rumors started coming out. I am 100 percent against this **** contract. Every single one of my reps voted for it. My emails didn't change a thing. I already stopped doing the survey after C2012, now I'm done emailing my reps.
As usual, DALPA ignored the survey completely did they're own thing. As usual, the company is trying to hold small airplanes over our head to get a forced yes. This thing will pass as usual. Disgusting really. I did the survey this time around. What a waste of my time. |
Originally Posted by dc10guy
(Post 1903781)
I can't believe he is only looking at pay. Unbelievable
|
Originally Posted by Professor
(Post 1903463)
The block hour conversion is also up gauging protection. Because all of our WB deliveries both real and notional are larger than the 767, EASK balance doesn’t help us keep jobs. As we up gauge the 767s on the JV routes, we add seats and keep 3/person crews. Keep in mind as well that using pilot block hours would hurt us because of the crew imbalances amongst the JV partners, as previously mentioned.
|
Originally Posted by jiminmem
(Post 1903785)
I'd venture 50% of voters only look at the pay rates at that's it.
|
Originally Posted by Bananie
(Post 1903466)
That is only for FRMS categories, which right now means 777 only. Any other category is the same.
|
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1903503)
What about the Alter Ego provisions in Section one? Why did we agree that one human being, in this case Mike Donatelli, gets to approve the creation of 'Delta China' and 'Delta Atlantic' to fly Delta branded metal on Delta routes and Delta tickets, the profit going to Delta, and NO DELTA PILOTS at the controls!!! This is historic to be sure! As in our jobs are HISTORY!
I don't care what the explanation is, this negates our top end scope...completely. Completely! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands