![]() |
Originally Posted by Professor
(Post 1905379)
I would assume about the same as last year maybe?
1000ish a year should be about our max throughout. But just a guess. Someone here may know better. That's a lot of LCA flying that first officers won't be able to bid. |
Originally Posted by Professor
(Post 1905379)
I would assume about the same as last year maybe?
1000ish a year should be about our max throughout. But just a guess. Someone here may know better. No matter what, it is far far worse than the measly 150 or so pilots affected that they threw to us at the MEC meeting. Every FO gets affected by this as well as junior CAs as game theory takes hold and bidding strategies change as premium pay is cut. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1905385)
Think about how many people kicked back to reserve that equals. Think about how many green slips and white slips missed that equals due to the extra reserves. How about some projections on that (without the optimistic spin)?
No matter what, it is far far worse than the measly 150 or so pilots affected that they threw to us at the MEC meeting. Every FO gets affected by this as well as junior CAs as game theory takes hold and bidding strategies change as premium pay is cut. |
Originally Posted by MrBojangles
(Post 1905388)
they should've just said " no GS if you get removed from a LCA trip". that would be bad too and I still would vote no, but at least it would seem to affect their target instead of every FO. There seems to be another motive here, but I'm not sure what it is. Perhaps if we send this back, that's their plan B and then we will view it as a win even though it isn't.
|
Originally Posted by JungleBus
(Post 1905399)
Actually, that wouldn't have affected their target at all. It's not that they mind those guys flying greenslips; if they're gonna get bought off LCA trips, the company would probably rather they help cover the open flying vs sitting at home. The company doesn't like paying *two* FOs for the same trip. By withholding the trip for OE, they only have to pay one FO for the trip, force everyone else on down the list until there's one extra guy on reserve, and he can fly the open trip for RSV guarantee. It's win-win-win...for the company.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1905303)
Exactly right. I was overall quite pleased when I saw the money.
How incredibly disappointing when you start to peel back the layers. It's all about increasing productivity with less premiums while also giving the company more leeway in areas they wanted. If slowplay would look around that FDX thread, they were at first upset with their progress, but they have attained some perspective that maybe their path isn't as bad as it seems with what we are giving up to get this quick TA. The UA comment he had was the only positive one, the rest were saying "no no no!" particularly with the LCA holdback thing (one of their biggest desires to fix). I am not that pleased with the pay rates. We effectively get an 8% raise - this one is pure since we got the COLA on 1 Jan 15. But that's it, the next raise is offset by the PS give back and the last two raises won't meet inflation. Remember in C2012, when they told us we would never see the 2014/15 raises because we'd be back at the table? The raises aren't the only positive in this TA, but they're the main player and the roadshows will HEAVILY be weighted toward them. Let's not forget how much money DAL made last year. This isn't a BK contract, though it sure reads like one. So in the end, I have to ask the MEC "Why did you TA a deal that gives us only an 8% raise EARLY but burn all of the furniture to do it? Do you buy cars at over MSRP too?" |
Originally Posted by JungleBus
(Post 1905399)
Actually, that wouldn't have affected their target at all. It's not that they mind those guys flying greenslips; if they're gonna get bought off LCA trips, the company would probably rather they help cover the open flying vs sitting at home. The company doesn't like paying *two* FOs for the same trip. By withholding the trip for OE, they only have to pay one FO for the trip, force everyone else on down the list until there's one extra guy on reserve, and he can fly the open trip for RSV guarantee. It's win-win-win...for the company.
This is no 'Oh the 190s are going to replace 88's." That is conjecture at best. This is quantifiable, yet very complex math on predicting how it will effect everyone and their behavior with the prior stated changes. (I personally go for super high value per day up to GS trigger and then will only GS above that- with reduced GS due to increased reserves I will be forced change my gaming of bidding) |
HITLER reads TA
|
Details on Delta TA
Heard a rumor that the first E-190 is going to be named, "Spirit of Delta Pilots"
[emoji3] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by JungleBus
(Post 1905399)
Actually, that wouldn't have affected their target at all. It's not that they mind those guys flying greenslips; if they're gonna get bought off LCA trips, the company would probably rather they help cover the open flying vs sitting at home. The company doesn't like paying *two* FOs for the same trip. By withholding the trip for OE, they only have to pay one FO for the trip, force everyone else on down the list until there's one extra guy on reserve, and he can fly the open trip for RSV guarantee. It's win-win-win...for the company.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands