Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:07 PM
  #9341  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
This will be a very damaging TA regardless of how we vote on it. It we pass it we eat massive concessions all around, including unprecidented foreign alter ego airlines and a lower and further reduceable AF/KLM JV. If we vote against it it will take a strong effort to overcome the baseline it created.

So I propose we gift the company 100 million dollars.

That's right, and I'm not kidding.

If the net value of this TA is supposedly 1.1B over 3 years, and assuming it was properly comprehensively costed out (I don't think it was, but the company and the NC will absolutely stand by that it was) then when we vote it down let's offer 1.0B over 3 years to our current contract and put it in payrates alone. Nothing else. Nothing. Else.

The company couldn't possibly have a problem with that, could they? If the true net cost was 1.1B extra and we're offering them a free 100M (to return to the shareholders! Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!) then they would be a fiduciary obligation for them to accept that.

Assuming this TA was properly costed out all around that is. Which further assumes they would *never* do any of the worst case things that they *could* do IAW this TA, like massive sick harassment on a scale never before seen, foreign alter egos, 75/76's against a new A380 order for our "partners" AF/KLM, etc.

If the true cost of the pros and cons cost 1.1B extra, from our point of view and theirs, give them one hundred million dollars, or donate it to the charity of their choice, and put the 1.0B into pay rates alone and stick with current book.

What possibe problem could they have with that?
Another great post that needs to stay in the rotation
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:09 PM
  #9342  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

I appreciate the twisting in the wind, for no reason related to the TA.

But my name is neither brian nor shiznit.

So I would expect an apology but I'm not holding my breath.
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:13 PM
  #9343  
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Think about where all the 747 F/O's are going to displace to.

If this thing goes through, instead of them displacing to say, senior 777 F/O or senior A330 F/O, they will probably say, "Well, that whole LCA trip drop thing was great while it lasted, but it sucks so bad now, I'm going to displace into the 767ER Captain seat.".

Presto, the junior 767 Captains are displaced to the 737, and those junior Captains displace to the 88, and those junior Captains have a party because they HATE flying the MD88!

You guys are playing checkers, Richard is playing chess. You all need to look about 2-3 years (at least!) down the road to see the same thing Richard is seeing and setting the table for today.
You are correct about displacing 744 FO's however I doubt there is a whole lot of 744 OE training going on and LCA bidding. This is mostly a narrow body/7ER FO issue. Most 744 FO's could already hold Capt on something or have been previously. Yes, some will again decide to fly narrow body Capt and displace, but awards of senior narrow body FO's to Capt will not, which was Carl's assertion. Biggest drag of the 744 retirement will be many positions will be filled from above rather than below. Now add in the CVG base closure and we will have stagnation for the bottom half of the list for a while.....
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:14 PM
  #9344  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
To compare apples to apples one needs to consider inflation over the same period of time. Yes we reach the rates by 2018 but as ha been pointed out before, a dollar today doesn't buy what a dollar did in 2004.



On another note Professor, if you are only trying to verify a illness and the company doesn't agree with your Dr and wants you to release your medical records (14.G.1/2), why do they need access to consecutive days before and after? How many days are we talking about? The company's only concern should be the work days you were sick, not anything else...



Denny

I'll try and find out Denny.
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:15 PM
  #9345  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Disregard...
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:23 PM
  #9346  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the invite, but I decline. You may not like the debate, but both are contributors that add to the conversation. If you can't listen to their reasoning then you weaken our argument to defeat this TA.

And I would wager that when the votes are cast at least one will vote no. Isn't that part of the 20%?


Originally Posted by SayAlt
I have now put "Professor" on ignore. I'd like to invite the rest of you to join me.

To put someone on "ignore", here is the procedure:

1. Click on the username; a dropbox will open below it
2. Click on "View public profile"
3. This will take you to their user page. Just underneath their username on the top right you will see two new dropboxes titled "Send message" and "user lists"
4. Click on "User lists"
5. Select "ignore user"
6. Confirm you selection
7. You will now no longer see the posts of that user
8. Win!!
.
.


Edit: I have included BenderRodriguez as well. I hope you will join me.
.
.
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:24 PM
  #9347  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
I appreciate the twisting in the wind, for no reason related to the TA.
Come on shiznit, relax. I don't care about your name change. It is important though given how rabidly defensive you've always been of the MEC administration. It gives everyone a fair perspective...on your fair perspectives.

Originally Posted by Professor
But my name is neither brian nor shiznit.
I'm sure your birth certificate doesn't say "shiznit" so at least that part of your sentence is true.

Originally Posted by Professor
So I would expect an apology but I'm not holding my breath.
Uhhh, I think an apology is due from you shiz. Now, continue your "education" of us...under either screen name.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:25 PM
  #9348  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Come on shiznit, relax. I don't care about your name change. It is important though given how rabidly defensive you've always been of the MEC administration. It gives everyone a fair perspective...on your fair perspectives.



I'm sure your birth certificate doesn't say "shiznit" so at least that part of your sentence is true.



Uhhh, I think an apology is due from you shiz. Now, continue your "education" of us...under either screen name.

Carl
We are two different humans. Period.

Let us move on.
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:27 PM
  #9349  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
We are two different humans. Period.

Let us move on.
OK shiznit.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-16-2015 | 05:30 PM
  #9350  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Denny,

Tried to turn this around as soon as I saw it.

So, first off there is not now nor is there any release of you medical records. Ever. That release is so that the doctor can communicate with DHS.

So, for example let us say that you pulled your back out on tuesday.

You have a trip on Thursday.

You are hitting day 15 on Thursday to call in sick.

Your doctor sends a verification to DHS that says, "back pain".

DHS asks for more information, specifics.

Preceding days come into play because you went to see your doctor on Tuesday. Your sick count starts Thursday.

DHS gets another note from your doctor that says,"Denny came to me for a back strain, I prescribed him pills that prohibit him for flying for a few days, expected return on Saturday."

That is the extent of the verification.
And that return date is not a binding date. Its just an idea of your return to work only.

Hope that helps.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices