Details on Delta TA
06-16-2015 | 05:50 PM
#9361
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
What records are we required to release if we are out more than 24 days of any rolling 365?
Stop quibbling and answer. Unless, of course, you are not actually interested in being objective.
06-16-2015 | 05:54 PM
#9362
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
I don't quibble. And maybe I misunderstood your question. I am asking again. Sorry.
06-16-2015 | 05:58 PM
#9363
Back on TDY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Hang in there with me on this one folks...
Follow this conversation and decide whether Shiznit/Professor just lied to us on behalf of the MEC administration while on flight pay loss:
Sounded like Shiznit/Professor posting good gouge right? Just trying to get the truth out, right?
This is the kind of stuff you're going to get at the road shows guys. The plan is to sell this to us by what they THINK the language really means...not the actual language itself.
You just lied to us Shiz.
Carl
On another note Professor, if you are only trying to verify a illness and the company doesn't agree with your Dr and wants you to release your medical records (14.G.1/2), why do they need access to consecutive days before and after? How many days are we talking about? The company's only concern should be the work days you were sick, not anything else...
So, first off there is not now nor is there any release of you medical records. Ever. That release is so that the doctor can communicate with DHS.
So, for example let us say that you pulled your back out on tuesday.
You have a trip on Thursday.
You are hitting day 15 on Thursday to call in sick.
Your doctor sends a verification to DHS that says, "back pain".
DHS asks for more information, specifics.
Preceding days come into play because you went to see your doctor on Tuesday. Your sick count starts Thursday.
DHS gets another note from your doctor that says,"Denny came to me for a back strain, I prescribed him pills that prohibit him for flying for a few days, expected return on Saturday."
That is the extent of the verification.
And that return date is not a binding date. Its just an idea of your return to work only.
So, for example let us say that you pulled your back out on tuesday.
You have a trip on Thursday.
You are hitting day 15 on Thursday to call in sick.
Your doctor sends a verification to DHS that says, "back pain".
DHS asks for more information, specifics.
Preceding days come into play because you went to see your doctor on Tuesday. Your sick count starts Thursday.
DHS gets another note from your doctor that says,"Denny came to me for a back strain, I prescribed him pills that prohibit him for flying for a few days, expected return on Saturday."
That is the extent of the verification.
And that return date is not a binding date. Its just an idea of your return to work only.
You just lied to us Shiz.
Carl
06-16-2015 | 06:04 PM
#9365
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
I see a strategy emerging. The union guys are baiting you into petty, silly arguments so the pages get filled up with garbage. If you fall for it people WILL lose interest. We need to keep them reading so they can get the negatives somewhere. We "NO" they won't get any negatives from the union!
06-16-2015 | 06:06 PM
#9366
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
I see a strategy emerging. The union guys are baiting you into petty, silly arguments so the pages get filled up with garbage. If you fall for it people WILL lose interest. We need to keep them reading so they can get the negatives somewhere. We "NO" they won't get any negatives from the union!
Except no one is baiting them. Or trying.
I am not shiznit. Shiznit is not me.
It's like a Zen koan.
Anyway. Thanks. No and yes voters deserve information. Not distraction.
If this thing fails people need to fully understand what was in it and what needs to change next time as well.
06-16-2015 | 06:08 PM
#9368
Back on TDY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
I see a strategy emerging. The union guys are baiting you into petty, silly arguments so the pages get filled up with garbage. If you fall for it people WILL lose interest. We need to keep them reading so they can get the negatives somewhere. We "NO" they won't get any negatives from the union!
Carl
06-16-2015 | 06:09 PM
#9369
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
I see a strategy emerging. The union guys are baiting you into petty, silly arguments so the pages get filled up with garbage. If you fall for it people WILL lose interest. We need to keep them reading so they can get the negatives somewhere. We "NO" they won't get any negatives from the union!
This is precisely my rational for putting Einhorn and Finkle on "ignore", and my invitation for others to join me.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
