NC Resigns--Paging Heiko?
#51
+1
I like Heiko... he's a super nice guy. But make no mistake he is of the same mindset as what we've been dealing with for the past 10 years with "Moakism." He was very proud of what we did with C2012. "New blood" is exactly what we need.
Put Heiko in contract administration if he'll do it... he is ace of the bass with that stuff!
I like Heiko... he's a super nice guy. But make no mistake he is of the same mindset as what we've been dealing with for the past 10 years with "Moakism." He was very proud of what we did with C2012. "New blood" is exactly what we need.
Put Heiko in contract administration if he'll do it... he is ace of the bass with that stuff!
Carl
#52
Carl
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 197
If I recall the stock increase that day had nothing to do with the vote. I would say it depends on how badly the labor peace goes off the rails and effects metrics. You've never been one to promote leverage though. Always take the first offer and when management says jump you say "how high"!
We get it, you're part of the I've got my captain/check airman gig, screw everything/everybody else no matter the concession...just give a little pay bump and you're good. You're an outlier here and not going to sway anybody with your lame duck arguments.
We get it, you're part of the I've got my captain/check airman gig, screw everything/everybody else no matter the concession...just give a little pay bump and you're good. You're an outlier here and not going to sway anybody with your lame duck arguments.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: CA
I guess you are not the George I was looking for. Doesn't change the rest of what I said. You are roll over and play dead kind of guy. You do no good to this pilot group always pushing management arguments.
#56
Really? You're comparing the rise in stock price to the "NO" vote?

You know the gain in our stock price on July 10th had NOTHING to do with the outcome of our vote. IIRC, the results of our vote weren't even released until after the market had closed, or close to it anyway.
The rise in stock prices on the day voting ended was ONLY coincidental and mostly due to the declining worries of Greece's economy and China.
Elliot
#57
#58
I suspect that most of the best and brightest who you might want to see on the neg committee will chose not to participate. They understand the process and what lies ahead. Why take a cut in pay, work far harder and more then likely end up vilified by the pilot group. I hope we can find some great replacements but I am not holding my breath.
It's agreed then since you say the best and brightest won't participate. OBTW > = FUD
1. Ari Emanuel: Co-CEO of Willaim Morris Endeavor
2. Gary Kohlman: lead counsel for the NBA players Association.
3. Neil Shwartz and Jonathon Feinsod: Schwartz and Feinsod - in the NFL, they are considered the best Attorneys for using leverage. Currently represent Darrelle Revis
http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/07/23/dar...-new-york-jets
Pick one.
Even if they are high on Spice and Oxy, and have pulled an all nightier at The Cheetah before showing up to negotiate, it's likely they could do exponentially better than the ALPA attorneys, and, definitely more so than the pilots who have been through the quickie course.
Last edited by TheManager; 08-04-2015 at 11:22 PM.
#59
Money isn’t Revis’s favorite subject, but it’s not one he can avoid.
He’s the most modern of modern athletes, an unsentimental businessman who demands to be paid exactly what he thinks he’s worth.
Through eight seasons Revis has banked $85 million. He’s earned more than all but two players in his 2007 draft class: Calvin Johnson and Joe Thomas, who play two of the highest-paid positions in football, receiver and left tackle. Three-time All-Pro running back Adrian Peterson has made $13 million less.
If Revis were a lawyer, an entrepreneur or a hedge-fund manager, he would be lauded for his business acumen and negotiating skills. But in the world of pro football he’s seen as someone who refuses hometown discounts and holds teams hostage to boost his salary. Depending on who’s talking, he’s a genius or an All-Pro for hire (there’s that mercenary thing again) or simply an -outlier—sometimes all three at once.
Revis wrestles with the logic of NFL economics. Teams will cut under-performing players or tear up contracts after poor seasons, but when those same players exceed expectations, teams ask them to honor whatever agreement they signed. Franchises that win the most (see: Patriots, New England) ask their best performers to play for less money so they can sign even more top talent and continue to win and continue to sign more players . . . at a discount . . . to win more games. “We’re fighting against 32 billionaires,” Revis says. “A lot of guys are brainwashed, feeding into the system. It’s genius how the NFL did it.”
Revis sees the NFL as he does any other business. It’s a fallacy that all anyone wants to do is win. Everyone wants to win, but also to cash in—and not necessarily in that order. He knows that sounds selfish. He doesn’t expect sympathy. The NFL Players Association, he points out, bargained for the current labor agreement, one that Revis has worked to his advantage the way few non-QBs have.
On the plane to Vegas, (taking team mates to the FM MP fight) Revis bantered about being envious of “how the NBA does business,” Revis says, referring mostly to the guaranteed money in that league’s contracts. “We’re really jealous of that.
“If only this was the NBA.”
In 1997, when he was 12, Revis lived in Aliquippa, Pa., a depressed former steel-mill town outside Pittsburgh. His uncle, Sean Gilbert, was in town that fall, which was strange because Gilbert was a Pro Bowl defensive tackle who’d been taken with the third pick in the ’92 draft.
Gilbert would play 11 NFL seasons, but not one snap in 1997. He staged a holdout against the Redskins that year before signing a seven-year, $47 million deal with the Panthers. Revis’s approach to football finance took shape right then, based on two concepts that his uncle employed: leverage and pressure. Gilbert’s talent produced leverage; his willingness to withhold that talent applied pressure. “Most players, the shield blinds them,” Gilbert says. “They feel privileged to play this game. They don’t realize they’ve been building their résumé. They’re qualified. This is their job. They’re assets.”
He’s the most modern of modern athletes, an unsentimental businessman who demands to be paid exactly what he thinks he’s worth.
Through eight seasons Revis has banked $85 million. He’s earned more than all but two players in his 2007 draft class: Calvin Johnson and Joe Thomas, who play two of the highest-paid positions in football, receiver and left tackle. Three-time All-Pro running back Adrian Peterson has made $13 million less.
If Revis were a lawyer, an entrepreneur or a hedge-fund manager, he would be lauded for his business acumen and negotiating skills. But in the world of pro football he’s seen as someone who refuses hometown discounts and holds teams hostage to boost his salary. Depending on who’s talking, he’s a genius or an All-Pro for hire (there’s that mercenary thing again) or simply an -outlier—sometimes all three at once.
Revis wrestles with the logic of NFL economics. Teams will cut under-performing players or tear up contracts after poor seasons, but when those same players exceed expectations, teams ask them to honor whatever agreement they signed. Franchises that win the most (see: Patriots, New England) ask their best performers to play for less money so they can sign even more top talent and continue to win and continue to sign more players . . . at a discount . . . to win more games. “We’re fighting against 32 billionaires,” Revis says. “A lot of guys are brainwashed, feeding into the system. It’s genius how the NFL did it.”
Revis sees the NFL as he does any other business. It’s a fallacy that all anyone wants to do is win. Everyone wants to win, but also to cash in—and not necessarily in that order. He knows that sounds selfish. He doesn’t expect sympathy. The NFL Players Association, he points out, bargained for the current labor agreement, one that Revis has worked to his advantage the way few non-QBs have.
On the plane to Vegas, (taking team mates to the FM MP fight) Revis bantered about being envious of “how the NBA does business,” Revis says, referring mostly to the guaranteed money in that league’s contracts. “We’re really jealous of that.
“If only this was the NBA.”
In 1997, when he was 12, Revis lived in Aliquippa, Pa., a depressed former steel-mill town outside Pittsburgh. His uncle, Sean Gilbert, was in town that fall, which was strange because Gilbert was a Pro Bowl defensive tackle who’d been taken with the third pick in the ’92 draft.
Gilbert would play 11 NFL seasons, but not one snap in 1997. He staged a holdout against the Redskins that year before signing a seven-year, $47 million deal with the Panthers. Revis’s approach to football finance took shape right then, based on two concepts that his uncle employed: leverage and pressure. Gilbert’s talent produced leverage; his willingness to withhold that talent applied pressure. “Most players, the shield blinds them,” Gilbert says. “They feel privileged to play this game. They don’t realize they’ve been building their résumé. They’re qualified. This is their job. They’re assets.”
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 197
Sailing,
Really? You're comparing the rise in stock price to the "NO" vote?

You know the gain in our stock price on July 10th had NOTHING to do with the outcome of our vote. IIRC, the results of our vote weren't even released until after the market had closed, or close to it anyway.
The rise in stock prices on the day voting ended was ONLY coincidental and mostly due to the declining worries of Greece's economy and China.
Elliot
Really? You're comparing the rise in stock price to the "NO" vote?

You know the gain in our stock price on July 10th had NOTHING to do with the outcome of our vote. IIRC, the results of our vote weren't even released until after the market had closed, or close to it anyway.
The rise in stock prices on the day voting ended was ONLY coincidental and mostly due to the declining worries of Greece's economy and China.
Elliot
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



