Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
NC Resigns--Paging Heiko? >

NC Resigns--Paging Heiko?


Notices

NC Resigns--Paging Heiko?

Old 08-04-2015 | 05:10 PM
  #51  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
+1

I like Heiko... he's a super nice guy. But make no mistake he is of the same mindset as what we've been dealing with for the past 10 years with "Moakism." He was very proud of what we did with C2012. "New blood" is exactly what we need.

Put Heiko in contract administration if he'll do it... he is ace of the bass with that stuff!
100% agree. Nice guy, but wrong guy.

Carl
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 05:17 PM
  #52  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
Sailing.

Thank you. You have just articulated the best case for the use of non pilot, paid professionals, to the maximum extent possible.

We send 30M+ a year in dues to alpa. That would pay for 100 $300k/year real life 'experts'.

Who would also pay for their own lunches.
50+ million per year Bob. Other than that, agree completely.

Carl
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 05:28 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 197
Default

Originally Posted by MtEverest
If I recall the stock increase that day had nothing to do with the vote. I would say it depends on how badly the labor peace goes off the rails and effects metrics. You've never been one to promote leverage though. Always take the first offer and when management says jump you say "how high"!

We get it, you're part of the I've got my captain/check airman gig, screw everything/everybody else no matter the concession...just give a little pay bump and you're good. You're an outlier here and not going to sway anybody with your lame duck arguments.
Not now nor have I ever been a check airman. Where do you guys keep coming up with all the fiction?
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 05:46 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Not now nor have I ever been a check airman. Where do you guys keep coming up with all the fiction?
I guess you are not the George I was looking for. Doesn't change the rest of what I said. You are roll over and play dead kind of guy. You do no good to this pilot group always pushing management arguments.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 05:54 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MtEverest
Some might argue, accepting C2012 set us up for the failure we now know as POS15. You are correct, C2012 was not good...just better than C2015.
And those arguing that would be correct.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 07:30 PM
  #56  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Wall Street views costs as far more important then labor peace. The Day the contract was voted down Delta stock had one of its biggest 1 day gains in history.
Sailing,

Really? You're comparing the rise in stock price to the "NO" vote?



You know the gain in our stock price on July 10th had NOTHING to do with the outcome of our vote. IIRC, the results of our vote weren't even released until after the market had closed, or close to it anyway.

The rise in stock prices on the day voting ended was ONLY coincidental and mostly due to the declining worries of Greece's economy and China.

Elliot
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 09:04 PM
  #57  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Not now nor have I ever been a check airman. Where do you guys keep coming up with all the fiction?
You've identified yourself as George in the past, and there is an NYC LCA who has participated in other forums- it was thought you were him.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 10:55 PM
  #58  
TheManager's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I suspect that most of the best and brightest who you might want to see on the neg committee will chose not to participate. They understand the process and what lies ahead. Why take a cut in pay, work far harder and more then likely end up vilified by the pilot group. I hope we can find some great replacements but I am not holding my breath.
My 'Flight Standards' lanyard wearing brother - or is it an ALPA lanyard??? Or....is it George. Either way:

It's agreed then since you say the best and brightest won't participate. OBTW > = FUD

1. Ari Emanuel: Co-CEO of Willaim Morris Endeavor

2. Gary Kohlman: lead counsel for the NBA players Association.

3. Neil Shwartz and Jonathon Feinsod: Schwartz and Feinsod - in the NFL, they are considered the best Attorneys for using leverage. Currently represent Darrelle Revis

http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/07/23/dar...-new-york-jets

Pick one.

Even if they are high on Spice and Oxy, and have pulled an all nightier at The Cheetah before showing up to negotiate, it's likely they could do exponentially better than the ALPA attorneys, and, definitely more so than the pilots who have been through the quickie course.

Last edited by TheManager; 08-04-2015 at 11:22 PM.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 11:15 PM
  #59  
TheManager's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Money isn’t Revis’s favorite subject, but it’s not one he can avoid.

He’s the most modern of modern athletes, an unsentimental businessman who demands to be paid exactly what he thinks he’s worth.

Through eight seasons Revis has banked $85 million. He’s earned more than all but two players in his 2007 draft class: Calvin Johnson and Joe Thomas, who play two of the highest-paid positions in football, receiver and left tackle. Three-time All-Pro running back Adrian Peterson has made $13 million less.

If Revis were a lawyer, an entrepreneur or a hedge-fund manager, he would be lauded for his business acumen and negotiating skills. But in the world of pro football he’s seen as someone who refuses hometown discounts and holds teams hostage to boost his salary. Depending on who’s talking, he’s a genius or an All-Pro for hire (there’s that mercenary thing again) or simply an -outlier—sometimes all three at once.

Revis wrestles with the logic of NFL economics. Teams will cut under-performing players or tear up contracts after poor seasons, but when those same players exceed expectations, teams ask them to honor whatever agreement they signed. Franchises that win the most (see: Patriots, New England) ask their best performers to play for less money so they can sign even more top talent and continue to win and continue to sign more players . . . at a discount . . . to win more games. “We’re fighting against 32 billionaires,” Revis says. “A lot of guys are brainwashed, feeding into the system. It’s genius how the NFL did it.”

Revis sees the NFL as he does any other business. It’s a fallacy that all anyone wants to do is win. Everyone wants to win, but also to cash in—and not necessarily in that order. He knows that sounds selfish. He doesn’t expect sympathy. The NFL Players Association, he points out, bargained for the current labor agreement, one that Revis has worked to his advantage the way few non-QBs have.

On the plane to Vegas, (taking team mates to the FM MP fight) Revis bantered about being envious of “how the NBA does business,” Revis says, referring mostly to the guaranteed money in that league’s contracts. “We’re really jealous of that.

“If only this was the NBA.”


In 1997, when he was 12, Revis lived in Aliquippa, Pa., a depressed former steel-mill town outside Pittsburgh. His uncle, Sean Gilbert, was in town that fall, which was strange because Gilbert was a Pro Bowl defensive tackle who’d been taken with the third pick in the ’92 draft.

Gilbert would play 11 NFL seasons, but not one snap in 1997. He staged a holdout against the Redskins that year before signing a seven-year, $47 million deal with the Panthers. Revis’s approach to football finance took shape right then, based on two concepts that his uncle employed: leverage and pressure. Gilbert’s talent produced leverage; his willingness to withhold that talent applied pressure. “Most players, the shield blinds them,” Gilbert says. “They feel privileged to play this game. They don’t realize they’ve been building their résumé. They’re qualified. This is their job. They’re assets.”
Reply
Old 08-05-2015 | 03:05 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 197
Default

Originally Posted by Elliot
Sailing,

Really? You're comparing the rise in stock price to the "NO" vote?



You know the gain in our stock price on July 10th had NOTHING to do with the outcome of our vote. IIRC, the results of our vote weren't even released until after the market had closed, or close to it anyway.

The rise in stock prices on the day voting ended was ONLY coincidental and mostly due to the declining worries of Greece's economy and China.

Elliot
Well it outperformed the S&P 500 almost gains by almost 3 to 1 and outperformed American and UAL that day. The results were out 2 hours before the market closed. The news certainly had no negative impact.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodriver
Hangar Talk
32
12-10-2011 03:54 AM
stickwiggler
Cargo
17
05-12-2011 03:47 PM
flybywire44
Cargo
3
02-16-2011 08:22 AM
coffee
Major
11
01-14-2010 07:03 PM
Flyguppy
Major
13
04-04-2008 08:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices