Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Do not vote Joe Thomas for C44 >

Do not vote Joe Thomas for C44

Search
Notices

Do not vote Joe Thomas for C44

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2015, 04:34 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757 View Post
It also makes it more difficult for sick people to call in sick. I have no doubt that if we give management a carte Blanche authorization to use any "designee" to determine whether we are sick or not and thus determine if we get paid or not for that sick time, some guys won't take the chance of calling in sick and will just show up to work. I don't want to work next to that guy. I don't want to get sick on a trip because of that.

I'd rather lose a little profit sharing and make sure everyone is happy and healthy when they show up to work.

Your arguments are weak Joe, and I hope you don't actually think that you have any chance of representing us.

Try a different route to a management job if you want one, cause this one ain't it. Sorry
The only people it will be harder for are the abusers. If you are sick, call in sick. If need be get verification and if the company questions that, your ALPA rep will be there to represent you.
Barca is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 04:36 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
poostain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 351
Default

Originally Posted by Barca View Post
The data was a bar graph showing monthly sick leave hours ( starting Jan '10 ) that was part of the TA roadshow power point presentation and was also included in the handout available as you entered the room for the brief. The data is available for all to see.
Good grief So you are talking about data our banished MEC handed to us to prove the company's point during the shameful cram down/dues wasting road show to educate us on how fraudulent our fellow pilots are so we accept a consession filled TA? (Takes a deep breath from the run on sentence) PLEEEEEEEAAAAASE!
poostain is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 05:03 PM
  #103  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

What is Barca's agenda?

Certainly not the line pilots' agenda.

Keep fishin Barca. You might eventually find a sucker.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 05:12 PM
  #104  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Barca View Post
The only people it will be harder for are the abusers. If you are sick, call in sick. If need be get verification and if the company questions that, your ALPA rep will be there to represent you.
Dude. NA15 is dead. Stop pretending otherwise.

Are you one of Jim Graham's boys?

I'm done pretending you are relevant.

Last edited by Scoop; 10-11-2015 at 10:32 PM.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 06:11 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Falcon20's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Up front
Posts: 962
Default

So I'm just a poolie but my buddy at SWA said that if you are sick you call skeds with your employee ID number and say I can't fly I'm sick. Done.

seems to me like this is pretty simple and the company can budget for all people to use 100%. Otherwise the enforcement starts to cost more than the payouts.
Falcon20 is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 07:10 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

I think it's interesting that the "spin" on the sick leave verification has changed in the last few days. There appears to be an effort to keep the TA15 sick language in whatever new TA comes forward.

We seem to have moved from

- You're too lazy to get a Dr note

to

- How can support those who abuse the sick leave system. Just look at the data, it's real.

We need to find a system that will be acceptable to the pilot group. I would suggest it's a stop on the pathway to "yes".
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 07:50 PM
  #107  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149 View Post
I think it's interesting that the "spin" on the sick leave verification has changed in the last few days. There appears to be an effort to keep the TA15 sick language in whatever new TA comes forward.

We seem to have moved from

- You're too lazy to get a Dr note

to

- How can support those who abuse the sick leave system. Just look at the data, it's real.

We need to find a system that will be acceptable to the pilot group. I would suggest it's a stop on the pathway to "yes".
The irony is that whole deal is right back to day 1 of the special MEC meeting that presented the TA. It didn't work then, and it won't work now. For people that think they are the brightest lights in the room, they sure behave as though they are the dimmest.

Fools will be fools.

Btw- the 190s have not been moved on and no cancellations of any 737 orders/options by DL have occurred.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 08:51 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,672
Default

Originally Posted by Whereisalpa View Post
Is it an attack to ask you Barca, does your jet have four legs a cushy black leather chair and a big heavy wooden door???
Probably like this;

John Carr is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 08:57 PM
  #109  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149 View Post
I think it's interesting that the "spin" on the sick leave verification has changed in the last few days. There appears to be an effort to keep the TA15 sick language in whatever new TA comes forward.

We seem to have moved from

- You're too lazy to get a Dr note

to

- How can support those who abuse the sick leave system. Just look at the data, it's real.

We need to find a system that will be acceptable to the pilot group. I would suggest it's a stop on the pathway to "yes".
PEB!

Ferd,

You know what has really happened?

DALPA and the company have added 1/3 of the entire pilot group to the list of pilots that realizes the universe won't implode if you vote no.

When you remove the fear of a no vote (which I think exists) you now actually have to come back with something good or you get no again.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 10-11-2015, 10:12 PM
  #110  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Barca View Post
Why this one issue? Because the changes were so reasonable and, if implemented, moved toward putting more money in our pockets.
Because Curly, the concessions took that money right back out of your pocket.

Originally Posted by Barca View Post
Why would we want to continue to make it easy for sick leave abuse,
We don't want that. That's why we agreed to the sick leave concession in C2012. The sick leave concessions in the failed TA were about making it easy for the company to abuse our sick leave

Originally Posted by Barca View Post
which both sides agree needs to be addressed, to continue?
That's not true anymore. One of the sides got thrown out and replaced for that view however.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MtEverest
Delta
64
06-30-2015 04:27 PM
tom11011
Regional
11
12-17-2014 04:56 AM
Bluto
Major
41
06-02-2012 10:00 AM
Rocket Man
Cargo
3
09-02-2005 06:21 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
05-12-2005 11:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices