![]() |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 2033656)
No, it not any type of arbitration - it is mediation, which is basically meaningless. It can certainly slow things down, but nothing can be forced upon us.
I think a lot of guys are confusing the two. Here is a primer: ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION Arbitration and mediation are parts of the labor relations process. Arbitration is the procedure by which parties agree to submit their disputes to an independent neutral third party, known as an arbitrator. Although there are several types of arbitration, labor arbitration is the dispute resolution procedure used in labor relations. Mediation also involves the active participation of a neutral third party whose role is to facilitate the dispute resolution process and to suggest solutions to resolve disputes. The term conciliation is often used interchangeably with mediation, but conciliation generally refers to the third party who brings the disputing parties together. While the mediator suggests possible solutions to the disputing parties, the arbitrator makes a final decision on the labor dispute which is binding on the parties. Scoop :) Arbitration is almost never part of the process unless its something else like a grievance over a contractual provision or a termination. The arbitrator clarifies contract language or makes the final determination on a termination case that did not get resolved at system board of adjustment. |
So when (if ever) is the 1st time we are legally allowed to take any kind of action? Until the company is facing delays, cancellations, and significantly increased costs which lead to consumer frustration and/or Wall Street angst, I don't see them being amenable to truly negotiating with us in good faith.
|
+++++++++1
|
Originally Posted by MikeF16
(Post 2033718)
So when (if ever) is the 1st time we are legally allowed to take any kind of action? Until the company is facing delays, cancellations, and significantly increased costs which lead to consumer frustration and/or Wall Street angst, I don't see them being amenable to truly negotiating with us in good faith.
I left my backpack right on top of my DB retirement plan, and now I can't find either one. |
Let's see it takes about 18% for us to come back up to a rate that we had over a decade ago (2004) while the rest of the company employees are well above their pre-giveback rates. So 22% is about my bare minimum to accept a TA at this point and that is if the company doesn't try to touch our profit sharing which will certainly happen as they can't have us get so much more than the noncon's.
I bet we are in for a long ride. |
Originally Posted by BobZ
(Post 2033408)
Marcal.....that is true...... but in the case of a pension trust, in the event of ROI setbacks the payout obligation is not diminished. The trustee has to reach into operating revenues and make beneficiaries whole.
Not that I'm advocating DB plans.... their record is dismal. Had alpa exercised even the minimum of fiduciary responsibility and required delta to fund a secondary financial vehicle to underwrite the 40% of a pilots pension the unqualified benefit represented...... we would not be having this discussion. At the point of BK timbo would have likely rolled a half million or more from this secondary financial vehicle into a qualified retirement account.... tax deferred. And would still have the pbgc benefit payment to offset the loss of the qualified component. Instead..... from the time timbo came to work, contract after contract, alpa told delta..." you only have to save enough to pay HALF of timbos pension, because..... after all...we trust you are good for the rest"..... Stupidity would be too kind of a descriptive. Particularly in light of the backdrop of eastern, pan am, and on and on. Arrogant ignorance is what it was... plain and simple. And so far as alpa goes.... nothing has changed. ; I read in Flying the Line 1, American Airline's pilots were some of the founders of ALPA, but eventually they left, one of their biggest reasons for leaving was, they wanted their retirement plans in their own names. When I asked Kim Welch (DALPA R+I Chairman during C2K, and after 9-11, when the run on the bank started) what would happen to our DB Plan if every eligible pilot retired early and took their 50% lump sum, he said, "Every pilot that retires early gets less than the full amount, and he also reduces future liabilities, and the plan is fully funded, so there is no danger of you (me) losing your DB plan." Then Kim left early, along with a bunch of other DALPA higher up's...:rolleyes: |
While I agree that this would be a 'decent' final product for our next TA, I believe that 50% + 1 would vote for these pay rates without any QOL 'plus' ups. I think most would accept the FO LCA being conceded. I actually think they would give up a few percent of PS, too. As long as sick leave is left alone, there seem to be plenty of older guys that would take that pay raise and let the rest go.
I appreciate everybody saying that this is barely good enough for our end state, but most of you were saying you were worried the old guys would accept the last one with 8, 6(0), 3, 3 if the sick leave changes weren't in there. I hope we stand strong for no QOL concessions, but anytime you throw money at the group, unity breaks down. |
Timbo.....i recall all too well the sneering accusation of alpa operatives directed at anyone who dared question their fabricated and foolish reality.
The pension was never.... repeat, never fully funded. For the simple reason about half your pension benefit came out of future operating revenues of the company. People go to JAIL for the type of fraud alpa has perpetrated. Alpa ONLY ACTED to create the mmpp when as you observed, there was a perceived threat to their status as a CBA. For the life of me I cannot understand or accept how this pilot group continues to retain a CBA with such a record of failure, let alone send them tens of millions in dues every year. The APA pilots departed the pattern because they knew the requirement of AFL-CIO affiliates to conform to the template of an employer owned pension plan was sowing the seeds of disaster. So delta pilots surrendered their DC plan and got in line.... to be screwed. And the APA pilots....... well they preserved the accrued value of their pilots retirement. Even the AFL-CIO knew employer owned DB plans were failures..... as early as the 1950's. Which is why they engaged in a decade plus long effort to create a mechanism to transfer these liabilities to the central government....... they didn't get that done fully, but the pbgc, a 'GSE' was the result. The pbgc....now an insolvent corporation that is supposed to pay the delta pilots annuitized retirement benefit. Well, guess what folks......IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN The question each and every beneficiary better be asking themselves now is......." what is our $50 million a year in dues doing about it?" ' |
The Dalpa R & I guys were as forthcoming as Jack Utsick, the concert producer. He swindled a boat load of money out of DAL pilots. Mum was the word on the retirement funding, and some guys were jumping ship in the middle of the night.
|
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 2033744)
Let's see it takes about 18% for us to come back up to a rate that we had over a decade ago (2004) while the rest of the company employees are well above their pre-giveback rates. So 22% is about my bare minimum to accept a TA at this point and that is if the company doesn't try to touch our profit sharing which will certainly happen as they can't have us get so much more than the noncon's.
I bet we are in for a long ride. |
Hank....... jack ran a Ponzi scheme.
Which is EXACTLY what alpa has done...... and profited from. |
Originally Posted by ExAF
(Post 2033785)
The noncon's could have been pilots if they were willing to do what it takes to get qualified to fly for DAL. Besides, THEY have already reached RESTORATION. We need to divorce ourselves from this line of thinking. We are not the noncon's. I can do a long ride.
|
The bolded part is what I was referring to in the original post.
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 2033744)
which will certainly happen as they can't have us get so much more than the noncon's.
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 2033883)
Um you need to reread my post. What I said is that these pay raises and keeping my PS as is...is my minimum. The company will think differently but that is their problem. So if they try and say ok to the payrates but you have to align with the noncons then I'm instantly a no vote.
|
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 2033525)
It bums me out that the weekly memo from SD says "we" will review "ALPA's" opener along a traditional route. Doesn't he have a seniority number? Which we is he supposed to be?
I can't tell where the company ends and the union begins. |
Originally Posted by BobZ
(Post 2033792)
Hank....... jack ran a Ponzi scheme.
Which is EXACTLY what alpa has done...... and profited from. At least Jack's scheme had some good music.... |
I hope the opener was presented more like a best and final offer, with the printed version delivered in a backpack.
"Mr. Anderson, we understand you would like labor risk off the table, especially before the busy summer season. We are giving you that opportunity today. We of course are more than willing to go down a traditional route, a route that we are unlikely to walk while wearing backpacks..." |
Just whose traditional route is Dickson talking about? North or South?
Merry Christmas! |
Originally Posted by Dynamohum
(Post 2034324)
All you have to consider is how long SD has been in that position to know which "side" he is on.
|
Originally Posted by ghilis101
(Post 2034462)
We have pilots at Delta that downt know the senior VP of flight Ops sits on the other side of the negotioating table, just like every airline in the world? Hmmmm.... I think this may be the reason why people have a skewed sense of friendship with our bosses. It's a business relationship, SD has marching orders and he follows them.
Merry Christmas Brothers.. TEN |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 2034468)
As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money.
Merry Christmas Brothers.. TEN Every time I see him he looks bigger! :eek: |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 2034468)
As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money.
Merry Christmas Brothers.. TEN Merry Christmas! |
[QUOTE=TenYearsGone;2034468]As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money[QUOTE]
It's chickensh*t to attack a man for his size. I've flown with plenty of line pilots who are....out of shape. Steve is a good guy. Yes he has a job to do, but he is on the pilots side on most issues. Would you rather have someone like OC in charge of flight ops? Not me. |
You want a real retirement plan? Get debt free, own your property outright, grow your own food (at least enough to supplement), and arm up to defend it. Your 415c limits aren't' going to mean squat when the government 1) eliminates the tax advantages of private retirement vehicles, and then 2) confiscates all that money. Don't' think it could happen? It's a certainty. The Leviathan needs fed. Private retirement money is the last great pile of money out there. It's already being talked about in academic circles. Nobody thought a lot of the stuff going on right now would ever happen...
|
They won't confiscate it...... they will just require it be held in treasury issues...:)
|
[QUOTE=Xray678;2034552][QUOTE=TenYearsGone;2034468]As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money
It's chickensh*t to attack a man for his size. I've flown with plenty of line pilots who are....out of shape. Steve is a good guy. Yes he has a job to do, but he is on the pilots side on most issues. Would you rather have someone like OC in charge of flight ops? Not me. |
[QUOTE=Xray678;2034552][QUOTE=TenYearsGone;2034468]As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money
It's chickensh*t to attack a man for his size. I've flown with plenty of line pilots who are....out of shape. Steve is a good guy. Yes he has a job to do, but he is on the pilots side on most issues. Would you rather have someone like OC in charge of flight ops? Not me. As for being on the pilots side on most issues, I contend that he is not. I think he has limited ability to do anything of real value if he wants to protect his job. |
He's paid to be management's Darth Vader. At least he's good at it.
|
[QUOTE=iceman49;2034598][QUOTE=Xray678;2034552]
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 2034468)
As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money
Know both of them; we would be much better off with OC in SDs position. Carl |
[QUOTE=Xray678;2034552][QUOTE=TenYearsGone;2034468]As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money
It's chickensh*t to attack a man for his size. I've flown with plenty of line pilots who are....out of shape. Steve is a good guy. Yes he has a job to do, but he is on the pilots side on most issues. Would you rather have someone like OC in charge of flight ops? Not me. To answer your question: "Yes," I would choose OC over the current occupant. The smarts and competence of neither man is in question. But if you like the idea of somebody who could see the pilots' perspective, a rotation of chairs might be in order. Not that it necessarily matters if your hands are tied from above. But if there were one more likely to turn in his papers and walk in favor of pilots, my money favors the high hair of over the expanded belt line! :D |
Did you guys know OC moonlights as singer/songwriter under the pseudonym of Lyle Lovett? Apparently it got him 3 years in the sack with Julia Roberts ;)
|
[QUOTE=zippinbye;2034952][QUOTE=Xray678;2034552]
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 2034468)
To answer your question: "Yes," I would choose OC over the current occupant. The smarts and competence of neither man is in question. But if you like the idea of somebody who could see the pilots' perspective, a rotation of chairs might be in order. Not that it necessarily matters if your hands are tied from above. :D
|
[QUOTE=ghilis101;2034641][QUOTE=Xray678;2034552]
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 2034468)
As smart as he is, I think he needs to March a little bit more; ONE, to look professional in his uniform and TWO, to live a longer and healthier life. There is no excuse for him not to hire a Physical trainer to help him lean out. He makes a ton of money
I don't think he meant it seriously. We all have to have a laugh every once in a while. Even SD himself I'm sure has a good laugh about it. We all have to have a thick skin in this industry. Its all good clean fun. As for being on the pilots side on most issues, I contend that he is not. I think he has limited ability to do anything of real value if he wants to protect his job. [QUOTE=Xray678;2035013][QUOTE=zippinbye;2034952]
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 2034552)
While I would agree that no one on the fourth floor is very good at seeing things from a pilots perspective, I have to laugh at the idea of OC having more of a pilot perspective than SD or JG. TEN |
Originally Posted by surfnski
(Post 2034991)
Did you guys know OC moonlights as singer/songwriter under the pseudonym of Lyle Lovett? Apparently it got him 3 years in the sack with Julia Roberts ;)
Carl |
[QUOTE=Xray678;2035013][QUOTE=zippinbye;2034952]
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 2034552)
While I would agree that no one on the fourth floor is very good at seeing things from a pilots perspective, I have to laugh at the idea of OC having more of a pilot perspective than SD or JG. |
Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
(Post 2033499)
36% pay raise in 3 years is nothing to shy away from. Compound it. Without touching profit sharing. If you get 20% from profit sharing and the 36%, this will pass. I might add with no concessions, I'm done giving.
That being said, I understand your feeling, this is pretty much my minimum. We've given so much, it's payback time. Delta is debt free, buying back stock and paying dividends thanks to the sacrifices of us. 50% pay cuts and lost pensions are not forgotten. |
Originally Posted by ERflyer
(Post 2035510)
It's a 39.7% raise.
TEN |
Yep. ERflyer will start ranting about black swans, and soiling his pants about the price of oil soaring.
The guy has a debilitating case of risk aversion. It's a miracle he even gets out of bed. Anyway, management loves it when he posts. |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 2035592)
Oh Shhhhhh!@#$!!!!! The ERflyer machine is about to start up..Stand by for posts that will tell us how we F'd up by voting No and that we will never see this "opener" come to fruition. Add in some key words like "TMV, Unlocking Value, Money in your pocket ". And then, utilize these key words in sentences that show that we will never recapture what we voted NO on...FIRE AWAY ER!!!!!:D:D:D
TEN |
Who the heck is OC?
|
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 2035624)
Who the heck is OC?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands