Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Who's gonna bid the 190 at DAL? >

Who's gonna bid the 190 at DAL?

Search
Notices

Who's gonna bid the 190 at DAL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2016, 04:01 PM
  #81  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
The 145 is so loud because that's the same nose as the Brasilia... just flying 100+ knots faster!
I think it was even nosier than the brazilia! I still see the 175/190 pilots wearing DC's so I wonder how much they worked on that.

Any airplane that requires David Clarks to not go deaf is going to be on my Do Not Bid list.....I still remember the sweaty plastic ear cups on those dang things. I finally got some foam covers. After that, they wouldn't slide on my sweaty head.....just had to dry out the covers on the layover.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 02-03-2016, 04:49 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,672
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
The 145 is so loud because that's the same nose as the Brasilia... just flying 100+ knots faster!
I always thought it was window and wiper combo.

Thought the Legacy uses some different pieces and is a quieter ride.
John Carr is offline  
Old 02-03-2016, 05:29 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL73n's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 737n/FO
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by NoDeskJob View Post
If it wasn't in Seattle I would. Would love to be senior as a relatively new guy. Could deal with the low pay for about 2 years, then go to something else.
Never assume you'll bid out of something when you need to. While the last few years of expansion have been great for new guys this stuff can come screeching to a halt in a minute (think we're not vulnerable to another big terrorist attack).
DAL73n is offline  
Old 02-03-2016, 05:41 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL73n's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 737n/FO
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by zippinbye View Post
So would it be a violation of the RLA for DALPA to "strongly dissuade" non-probationary pilots from bidding the 190 until rates can be fixed (or until a TA is approved)?

It's a serious question. Delta could try to staff the 190 with new hires and probationary pilots via manipulative AE/displacement pressures, but good luck with that. Also, such tactics would be big deviation from past practice. Whereas ALPA condoning a "no bid" would represent sound career counseling; avoiding a substandard position. Kind of like advocating no Green Slips and extra flying in general while furloughs exist.

"Just saying" if it's legal, it's something to ponder.
Major violation. During negotiations both sides are required to maintain a Status Quo which means the rate of white slips, green slips, sick leave use (and a bunch of other things) can't vary from its historical norms. APA (American) got a fine of somewhere around $50-100 Million for a violation of the Status Quo. You can't even suggest it on a bulletin board.
DAL73n is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 04:37 AM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Originally Posted by zippinbye View Post
Ex EMB 170/190 series drivers, please chime in. A few pages back, a poster cited sh**ty build quality on the 190. What gives? I've never heard anything but praise for the airplane's comfort, capabilities and quality. Sure, plenty of mainline guys have stigmatized it due to the "RJ factor," but it's range, seat capacity, flight deck and a spot on the DL operating certificate kind of put that criticism to rest. Accompanied by correct pay of course. We had no problem flying a 68 seat DC-9 just a few years ago for the same pay scale as today's 717. Mind you that and every DC-9 derivative was built like a tank to to engineering practices in place at the time (i.e. abacus calculations net .25" thick aluminum panel, make it .35" just to be sure). Thanks to CAD and other modern marvels, every new aircraft (except the 737 dino-liner) is built to a particular life expectancy without much "fudge factor" in the formula. Hence the 190 is a bunch lighter than similar capacity predecessors, and it's lift and range and economy reflect that. I might not want to be flying one at 90,000 cycles, but is it actually poorly built in some fashion?
The main complaints are actually passenger cabin stuff. Many cabin fixtures are very cheap and flimsy, especially in the Lavs. Things just seem to wear out and break way too quickly and often. The airplane itself is nice and comfy to fly, just watch your knees in a crosswind or that yoke will cap ya!
Rahlifer is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 04:45 AM
  #86  
Otto
 
MikeF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Turkish Pile Driver
Posts: 1,806
Default

Originally Posted by zippinbye View Post
So would it be a violation of the RLA for DALPA to "strongly dissuade" non-probationary pilots from bidding the 190 until rates can be fixed (or until a TA is approved)?

It's a serious question. Delta could try to staff the 190 with new hires and probationary pilots via manipulative AE/displacement pressures, but good luck with that. Also, such tactics would be big deviation from past practice. Whereas ALPA condoning a "no bid" would represent sound career counseling; avoiding a substandard position. Kind of like advocating no Green Slips and extra flying in general while furloughs exist.

"Just saying" if it's legal, it's something to ponder.
It would be a violation. When DAL pilots were refusing OT in 2000 the union advised AGAINST that policy and they still got sued by DAL. The decision was ludicrous from my very strong common sense background and complete lack of legal bee effing ess background. If you care to read the synopsis here it is: DELTA AIR LINES INC v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL | FindLaw

That said, the union won't have to say squat, because anybody past year 3 won't bid captain (with the exception of instructors who are paid at what they can hold) and almost no FOs will will bid it. You might see captain slots going to guys in indoc, you'll definitely see the FO side manned entirely by new hires.
MikeF16 is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 09:14 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

If they do assign 190 Cappy's in indoc, they'll hire carefully or the 1000 hours of 121 will bite 'em.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 03:48 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Blue fifi flogger
Posts: 736
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy View Post
I think it was even nosier than the brazilia! I still see the 175/190 pilots wearing DC's so I wonder how much they worked on that.

Any airplane that requires David Clarks to not go deaf is going to be on my Do Not Bid list.....I still remember the sweaty plastic ear cups on those dang things. I finally got some foam covers. After that, they wouldn't slide on my sweaty head.....just had to dry out the covers on the layover.
There's a lot of legitimacy to this concern. A couple other guys on here have posted glowing reviews of the ergonomics, which are probably accurate if your reference point is a 145 or turboprop. The overhead panel and systems operations are dirt-simple, and the Epic FMS architecture is very user-friendly. After that, my laundry list of issues:

It's a loud jet. At B6 we have ANC Sennheiser headsets which use ship's power; they are nice but clamp your head as part of the system. On the 320 most guys are headsets off every leg at FL180; try that in the 190 and you'll be deaf in 6 months. Anecdotally the 73ng cockpit seemed quite a bit quieter when I've been in the Jumpseat. And that jumpseater in the 190 will be right in your lap btw... At least it has a hot mic.

The pressurization and climate control stink. The outflow valve slams shut every time the jet transitions between high-stage and low-stage bleeds during a descent, so lots of pressure bumps. The FAs do indeed have control of the cabin but the sensors that work with their panel get clogged so easily the temp cycles between burning and freezing until you take control back in the cockpit. And don't get me started on whomever decided the pack should blow full cold after a bleed-source change....

The autothrottles are great for climb, cruise, and descent (except for TOD at Mach.78 when they'll add power and over speed the jet), and absolutely stink on approach. Think rapid 10 percent N1 changes for 2 knot speed corrections. If the approach procedure didn't require their use I just didn't...

The seats... We're on version four at JetBlue trying to find something that won't wreck everyone's back. Nice self-inflating lumbar cushions as well. Also, anyone who's flown a 120 or 145 knows that the seats are offset from the yoke to make all the cable runs fit in the cockpit. Now sit down in your gently-used, clean-sheet design mostly-FBW jet and tell me why in the @&$"!?$@ the seats are still offset... You WILL sit crooked with your inboard thigh half off the cushion in a few hours.

No boards below 180 kts or with greater than flaps 1, and above 3/4 deflection they shake the heck out of the tail with zero appreciable added effect. And the anti-ice system is all-or-nothing and automatically activated; it's entertaining trying to figure out how the heck you're gonna get down and slow down with the engines and wings on and the associated power bump. Electric slats and flaps too, so enjoy your sloooow configuration changes.

Having said all that the jet has provided 1000 jobs at B6 which would otherwise be at Republic et al, and it's a great ride in the back as long as you bring a sweater or pullover. Always good to see more jobs in a jet that weighs 114k pounds and can fly 2400 miles come back to mainline. My perspective is with 3500 hours in both seats of the jet, FYI.

Last edited by aewanabe; 02-04-2016 at 03:58 PM.
aewanabe is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 03:56 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by aewanabe View Post
There's a lot of legitimacy to this concern. A couple other guys on here have posted glowing reviews of the ergonomics, which are probably accurate if your reference point is a 145 or turboprop. The overhead panel and systems operations are dirt-simple, and the Epic FMS architecture is very user-friendly. After that, my laundry list of issues:

It's a loud jet. At B6 we have ANC Sennheiser headsets which use ship's power; they are nice but clamp your head as part of the system. On the 320 most guys are headsets off every leg at FL180; try that in the 190 and you'll be deaf in 6 months. Anecdotally the 73ng cockpit seemed quite a bit quieter when I've been in the Jumpseat. And that jumpseater in the 190 will be right in your lap btw... At least it has a hot mic.

The pressurization and climate control stink. The outflow valve slams shut every time the jet transitions between high-stage and low-stage bleeds during a descent, so lots of pressure bumps. The FAs do indeed have control of the cabin but the sensors that work with their panel get clogged so easily the temp cycles between burning and freezing until you take control back in the cockpit. And don't get me started on whomever decided the pack should blow full cold after a bleed-source change....

The autothrottles are great for climb, cruise, and descent (except for TOD at Mach.78 when they'll add power and over speed the jet), and absolutely stink on approach. Think rapid 10 percent N1 changes for 2 knot speed corrections. If the approach procedure didn't require their use I just didn't...

The seats... We're on version four at JetBlue trying to find something that won't wreck everyone's back. Nice self-inflating lumbar cushions as well. Also, anyone who's flown a 120 or 145 knows that the seats are offset from the yoke to make all the cable runs fit in the cockpit. Now sit down in your gently-used, clean-sheet design mostly-FBW jet and tell me why in the @&$"!?$@ the seats are still offset... You WILL sit crooked with your inboard thigh half off the cushion in a few hours.

No boards below 180 kts or with greater than flaps 1, and above 3/4 deflection they shake the heck out of the tail with zero appreciable added effect. And the anti-ice system is all-or-nothing and automatically activated; it's entertaining trying to figure out how the heck you're gonna get down and slow down with the engines and wings on and the associated power bump.

Having said all that the jet has provided 1000 jobs at B6 which would otherwise be at Republic et al, and it's a great ride in the back as long as you bring a sweater or pullover. Always good to see more jobs in a jet that weighs 114k pounds and can fly 2400 miles come back to mainline. My perspective is with 3500 hours in both seats of the jet, FYI.
We need AT for approaches??? New to me
feltf4 is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 03:59 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Blue fifi flogger
Posts: 736
Default

Originally Posted by feltf4 View Post
We need AT for approaches??? New to me
Cat 2/3, and RNP... At least at JetBlue
aewanabe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
appDude
Cargo
14
08-08-2013 03:10 PM
cgull
United
127
04-05-2013 03:43 AM
LCAL dude
United
17
10-02-2012 02:02 PM
jetblue320
JetBlue
30
06-21-2005 09:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices