Search

Notices

Swa aip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:14 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
They didn't get full retro. Full retro would be 15% from amendable date. The got 3/4/4 retro then snap up 15% from current rates on OCT 1
They got the retro they were asking for....
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:19 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dat jet
You have to put in 10% and he company gives them 9.3%

The 15% is a HHUUGGEE jump for them
I don't think that is exactly true either. You'd have to deuct the value of the matching they were getting, which I ***think*** was 9.3%, so in 3 years they get 5.7% total.

How much is their PS, anyway?
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:19 PM
  #33  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,265
Likes: 112
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Delta currently has a 15% B fund.




If you see how this deal helps us achieve our opener let me know. I'm all ears

It helps us because their rates - along with every other airline in our peer set has rates that are much greater than ours.

It doesn't matter that they took 3 or 4 years to get the rates - we are now lagging the industry. It is much easier for us to get a big bump since we are lagging vice when the TA was defeated and our rates were more toward the top. But I assume you know this.

Do you actually want a large raise? Or would rather us fail miserably so guys can see "See - we should have passed the last TA" because that is exactly how your posts are coming across.

The last TA is history yet you continue to go around implying what fools 65% of the Delta Pilots are. How do you see the talking down of UPS and or the Southwests deals as helping us any?

Scoop
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:20 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 198
Default

[QUOTE=TriStar_drvr;2191104]To clarify, SWA Uses a Trip for Pay (TFP) as the unit for pay. Current 12 year captain is $189.78 per TFP. The union uses a conversion factor of 1.149 to convert this to an hourly wage. Thus current hourly rate equivalent is $218.06 and the Agreement rate effective Oct 1 would be $250.76

It's certainly a big step up for SWA but I don't see it providing us much leverage. The companies current table position puts our 737 rate at 254 an hour now and 261.50 on 1 Jan with a 16DC. Add in a profit sharing program that will pay at least 10% more and you are talking about at least 18% more then SW on I Jan. I had hopes they might come in more toward 265 an hour.
The one thing it does do is keep SWA costs more inline with ours which might give management a little more wiggle room to get a deal done.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:22 PM
  #35  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,265
Likes: 112
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Because every airline is getting raises that fall near the company's offer?

If they all achieved these raises with minimal or no concessions your argument for us making concessions would be what exactly?

Yes our proposed rates were similar but at what cost to the rest of the contract?

Scoop
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:25 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
It helps us because their rates - along with every other airline in our peer set has rates that are much greater than ours.

It doesn't matter that they took 3 or 4 years to get the rates - we are now lagging the industry. It is much easier for us to get a big bump since we are lagging vice when the TA was defeated and our rates were more toward the top. But I assume you know this.

Do you actually want a large raise? Or would rather us fail miserably so guys can see "See - we should have passed the last TA" because that is exactly how your posts are coming across.

The last TA is history yet you continue to go around implying what fools 65% of the Delta Pilots are. How do you see the talking down of UPS and or the Southwests deals as helping us any?

Scoop
Everyone wants a raise.
Nobody wants a raise <= TA1
It's always possible we'll end up with <=TA1 if we execute poorly
How do you see the talking up or down of any other contract helping or hurting us? Don't the facts suffice?
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:26 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
They didn't get full retro. Full retro would be 15% from amendable date. The got 3/4/4 retro then snap up 15% from current rates on OCT 1
pretzel logic.

Make our 73 rates $260/hr and leave the rest of the pwa alone I would consider it a galactic alpa win.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:27 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It's certainly a big step up for SWA but I don't see it providing us much leverage. The companies current table position puts our 737 rate at 254 an hour now and 261.50 on 1 Jan with a 16DC. Add in a profit sharing program that will pay at least 10% more and you are talking about at least 18% more then SW on I Jan. I had hopes they might come in more toward 265 an hour.
The one thing it does do is keep SWA costs more inline with ours which might give management a little more wiggle room to get a deal done.
you don't get to use profit sharing in the equation....the nmb doesnt.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:28 PM
  #39  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,218
Likes: 273
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
It helps us because their rates - along with every other airline in our peer set has rates that are much greater than ours.

It doesn't matter that they took 3 or 4 years to get the rates - we are now lagging the industry. It is much easier for us to get a big bump since we are lagging vice when the TA was defeated and our rates were more toward the top. But I assume you know this.

Do you actually want a large raise? Or would rather us fail miserably so guys can see "See - we should have passed the last TA" because that is exactly how your posts are coming across.

The last TA is history yet you continue to go around implying what fools 65% of the Delta Pilots are. How do you see the talking down of UPS and or the Southwests deals as helping us any?

Scoop
I'm in no way vouching for TA1 which was rightfully turned down. This deal ended up right in the ballpark of the 16.5/3/3/3 offer. It kills any hope of 22/7/7.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:29 PM
  #40  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,265
Likes: 112
From: DAL 330
Default

[QUOTE=sailingfun;2191141]
Originally Posted by TriStar_drvr
To clarify, SWA Uses a Trip for Pay (TFP) as the unit for pay. Current 12 year captain is $189.78 per TFP. The union uses a conversion factor of 1.149 to convert this to an hourly wage. Thus current hourly rate equivalent is $218.06 and the Agreement rate effective Oct 1 would be $250.76

It's certainly a big step up for SWA but I don't see it providing us much leverage. The companies current table position puts our 737 rate at 254 an hour now and 261.50 on 1 Jan with a 16DC. Add in a profit sharing program that will pay at least 10% more and you are talking about at least 18% more then SW on I Jan. I had hopes they might come in more toward 265 an hour.
The one thing it does do is keep SWA costs more inline with ours which might give management a little more wiggle room to get a deal done.

So in the recent past we couldn't get a big raise because we were already leading the industry - I repeat that leading the industry.

Now that we are lagging the industry we still have no leverage because we would like rates just a little bit higher than what less profitable airlines already achieved. Not exactly the same standard that DALPA was touting for years.

How about this - There is a world-wide Pilot shortage developing, the world wide and domestic market for Pilots is increasing and appears to only be accelerating and yet all you see are headwinds and cloudy days ahead - got it.

Scoop
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
103
11-09-2011 03:08 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
av8r4aa
Major
82
11-29-2006 08:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices