Search

Notices

Swa aip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:45 PM
  #51  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,265
Likes: 112
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
It absolutely is not flame-bait in any shape or form. Every airline out there has made concessions. I can't figure out from a cursory glance of the AIP's exactly what concessions SWA made, and neither can you, but every airline out there made concessions. Every one.

What I put up is a statement of fact. Expecting zero concessions is outside the envelope of all recent contracts. I have been reading these boards, and every pilot group highlights their concessions better than you or I can. All of them have concessions to talk about.

I suggest you re-read my post.

That is exactly what I am talking about. I never said anything about expecting a contract with zero concessions but since you seem to think that I did I will allow you to quote me.

Take your time. Hint - you can click on my name and it will bring up every post that I ever made. Please show the one where I say I expect zero concessions.

Thanks.

Scoop
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:47 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Masters
Okay you win. I'll take their scope and 16/3/3/3.


Yep...me too...I agree Doug

And I'll take a continually accruing sick bank with no limit like SWA has

And No sick verification like SWA has

And the Ability to call fatigued and not get hassled and paid for a trip like SWA has

And No PBS like SWA

I swear some of you...and you know who you are could try to point out holes in a boat built by Jesus himself.
Some of your veiled attempts are beyond pathetic. If SWA got a deal that gave them an 18% 401K, and a DOS 40% pay increase, some of you would still find ways to be a Debbie downer
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:49 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I'm not being sarcastic, but I am curious how you figure the NMB is ignoring PS.


They don't count it because it's a variable number that can't be predicted...just like they don't account for scope.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:51 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
That is exactly what I am talking about. I never said anything about expecting a contract with zero concessions but since you seem to think that I did I will allow you to quote me.

Take your time. Hint you click on my name and it will bring up every post that I eve made. Please show the one where I say I expect zero concessions.
OK, I see where the problem is. I'm not attacking you in any way. I didn't say "You (Scoop) expect zero concessions, which makes you a giant boob", I said that if "you" (hypothetical you, meaning Scoop or anyone else) are holding out for zero concessions, you're falling outside the envelope.

Any group that expects not to give up anything at all is saying that they are going to do something else no one else has done. We can't simultaneously use the rest of the industry as an example, and not factor in the industry in our discussions.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:51 PM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
No airline out there did anything without concessions. If you're holding out for zero concessions, you're totally outside the envelope of what the industry is doing.

So since there ARE gains and concessions, I think you have to know a lot about costing at each airline to evaluate the values of the respective TA's.

Glancing at the highlights at SWA, I can't really figure out exactly what they did to their Section1. They say it's better, but don't we all?

Ummm...... We just did a 2 yr extension with ...... 0 concession. But I guess UAL isn't in the industry?
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:52 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
They don't count it because it's a variable number that can't be predicted...just like they don't account for scope.
Rumor has it that they sure spent a lot of time accounting for it on Friday.

I will agree that there is a bit of confusion as to exactly how to account for it by the various actors. I haven't heard any rumors as to how we, the company, or the NMB are specifically considering it.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:53 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 198
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
you don't get to use profit sharing in the equation....the nmb doesnt.
Ok, then 8% above SWA. I bet however the NMB will consider PS since it is a part of getting a ratified agreement which is all they care about.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:54 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
Ummm...... We just did a 2 yr extension with ...... 0 concession. But I guess UAL isn't in the industry?
Well, I'm no expert on your contract, but I think there were 5 or 6 items the company wanted addressed, one of which was ultra long-haul flying. True, or false?
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:55 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 198
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
Ummm...... We just did a 2 yr extension with ...... 0 concession. But I guess UAL isn't in the industry?
Sadly your extension came with pay rates lower then the TA we rejected.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 05:00 PM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Well, I'm no expert on your contract, but I think there were 5 or 6 items the company wanted addressed, one of which was ultra long-haul flying. True, or false?
1 item that was already in our contract that we said we wouldn't object. ULH. It's still there, just now they have to work with us and we can't veto before doing launch.

Yeah, I guess letting the company launch ULH without prior approval of ALPA for all 121 of our airframes that pay 305/hr was a concession.

Venture to guess what our most senior flying is?????
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
103
11-09-2011 03:08 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
av8r4aa
Major
82
11-29-2006 08:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices