Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
Envoy: The LOWEST paid Wholly Owned. >

Envoy: The LOWEST paid Wholly Owned.


Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy: The LOWEST paid Wholly Owned.

Old 06-28-2019 | 12:10 PM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 507
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
So you want the union to go running back to them and offer things to give up in order to get it done? The company needs this to get done more than we need it. They’re the ones who are going to see their staffing levels take a dive. It shouldn’t be up to ALPA to offer to give anything up that was agreed to. It’s not your fault or mine that Envoy screwed the pooch.
^^This

Concessions of any sort shouldn't be in anyone's vocabulary in this environment. Especially since management will doubly take advantage next time. Hold the line.
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 01:01 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by uavking
Especially since management will doubly take advantage next time. Hold the line.
Management is already “taking advantage” of the lowest paid and best performing WO.
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 03:15 PM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.

While it would have been nice, now we are getting delayed even further on the pay ...
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 03:22 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.

While it would have been nice, now we are getting delayed even further on the pay ...
Don't worry, you'll get back pay. Then you can go and buy yourself a new jetski.
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 03:33 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.

While it would have been nice, now we are getting delayed even further on the pay ...
Regardless of who is at fault, I believe the union doesn't know what to do. The answer to failed negotiations can’t be a do-nothing, business as usual, “cool down period.” And if the union is banking on low new-hire turnout to become their leverage, don’t forget what happened when the company needed DECs.
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 03:35 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.

While it would have been nice, now we are getting delayed even further on the pay ...
So the union should just roll over because others took the first shiny toy pit in front of them?

Fact is they had a signed deal and the company reneged.
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 03:41 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: Resigned
Default

We came too close to getting the goods to take concessions for the pay now. There’s blood in the rock, the NC found it.
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 03:46 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.
...
There’s really A LOT more to it than just a “pay increase” let the union do their thing.
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 04:04 PM
  #119  
jonrayburn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by havick206
Fact is they had a signed deal and the company reneged.
So close, right? But close only counts in horseshoes and handgrenades...
Reply
Old 06-28-2019 | 04:11 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LowvalueFO
I am going to say there is a 50/50 at fault here - the union went too far, should have just asked for no concessions and straight up pay increases only. That's what PSA and Piedmont got.

While it would have been nice, now we are getting delayed even further on the pay ...
I thought there was more than just a pay increase involved for both PSA and PDT. Not major changes, but not “just a pay raise” either.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyvector
Envoy Airlines
6966
06-18-2022 11:07 AM
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
SMACFUM
SkyWest
45
07-08-2015 06:47 AM
somedayillcare
Envoy Airlines
1
12-10-2014 02:30 AM
Littleforrest9
Money Talk
5
06-22-2014 05:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices