![]() |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3108723)
im jealous of the girls that he flex saying that he flies for American, bruuuh!
And those free teeth whitenings, brah. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3108725)
That 737 brahh.
And those free teeth whitenings, brah. I wonder if he’s gonna bundle up with JR and send a letter to the company. JR is now in Miami... |
Just like envoy has a few extra heavy landing weight145's, envoy could configure 20 aircraft for the Caribbean flying and keep them off domestic flights of 3 hours or more. Its not hard to route these aircraft only on specific routes. It is just aag and envoy pushing more bull.
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 3108581)
The plain and simple fact is that AA owns Miami and South Florida. Having their premier 175 WO doing the flying has always been the goal. Spread so thin over the past couple of years though has prevented it from coming to fruition earlier. You'll see this accelerate now. Envoy pilots will be flying all over the Caribbean soon.
Please tell us one thing you’ve posted here that came true. |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3108736)
Just like envoy has a few extra heavy landing weight145's, envoy could configure 20 aircraft for the Caribbean flying and keep them off domestic flights of 3 hours or more. Its not hard to route these aircraft only on specific routes. It is just aag and envoy pushing more bull.
A 145 driver could probably confirm/deny this. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 3108764)
If I remember right, all the 145's had the same takeoff weight.
A 145 driver could probably confirm/deny this. There are also 3 different versions: 135, 140, 145. Having different planes modified for different missions is not an insurmountable problem. It reduces flexibility and thus (slightly) increases cost. ENY wouldn’t be the first or the last airline to do it. |
Given that Johnny O on the Mesa call is basically saying “if we get an extension with AA, it will be smaller than we currently operate”, I’m a subscriber in the rumor of more DFW flying and dipping our toes in PHX.
YX is doing fine in MIA, there’s no reason for AA to replace them with Eaglevoy. |
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 3108581)
Envoy pilots will be flying all over the Caribbean soon.
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 3108764)
If I remember right, all the 145's had the same takeoff weight.
A 145 driver could probably confirm/deny this. |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3108826)
when I left the 145, there were only about 15 heavy weight mods. Did not know the did it to the whole fleet.
|
Does anyone know the count of people who took the latest VEOP? Additionally does anyone have the highlights of what they offered?
|
Originally Posted by 3400
(Post 3108784)
Given that Johnny O on the Mesa call is basically saying “if we get an extension with AA, it will be smaller than we currently operate”, I’m a subscriber in the rumor of more DFW flying and dipping our toes in PHX.
YX is doing fine in MIA, there’s no reason for AA to replace them with Eaglevoy. |
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3109846)
You think that AA reducing capacity on MESA means they will shift DFW capacity to you during a pandemic when everyone has too much flying and not enough passengers?
|
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3109846)
You think that AA reducing capacity on MESA means they will shift DFW capacity to you during a pandemic when everyone has too much flying and not enough passengers?
|
That HI6 sent by the dfw cp is despicable. She is not talking to a bunch of high schoolers where she needs to “say it again”
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3110230)
well honestly, I have to agree. I can’t say taxiing in while not paying attention and crushing another wingtip would be a good thing
|
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110231)
there are better ways to say it.
|
It's comical how thirsty this pilot group is for Republics Miami flying. AAG barely has enough cash to stay afloat right now, you are delusional to think that there is any remote chance they will equip your current 175's for EOW. Back when times were "good" and you were taking delivery of new planes, they were not even EOW. Go back to dreaming about opening up LAX.
|
Regarding the HI6, some of you have some thin skins. If you’re doing it correctly, the the message wasn’t directed at you. If you’re not doing it correctly, well, you’ve been told before and deserve the condescending tone.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 3110235)
Regarding the HI6, some of you have some thin skins. If you’re doing it correctly, the the message wasn’t directed at you. If you’re not doing it correctly, well, you’ve been told before and deserve the condescending tone.
|
Originally Posted by OffAtTango
(Post 3110234)
It's comical how thirsty this pilot group is for Republics Miami flying. AAG barely has enough cash to stay afloat right now, you are delusional to think that there is any remote chance they will equip your current 175's for EOW. Back when times were "good" and you were taking delivery of new planes, they were not even EOW. Go back to dreaming about opening up LAX.
But just FYI, the cost of equipping planes for EOW is effectively 0. Envoy has the equipment, and manuals ready to go. Paying crews to go jump in a pool is a trivial cost. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3110302)
No-one is hungry to take anyones flying at this time. Apart from a few vocal jackasses, the Compass announcement was sad news for all of us.
But just FYI, the cost of equipping planes for EOW is effectively 0. Envoy has the equipment, and manuals ready to go. Paying crews to go jump in a pool is a trivial cost. |
Originally Posted by OffAtTango
(Post 3110234)
It's comical how thirsty this pilot group is for Republics Miami flying. AAG barely has enough cash to stay afloat right now, you are delusional to think that there is any remote chance they will equip your current 175's for EOW. Back when times were "good" and you were taking delivery of new planes, they were not even EOW. Go back to dreaming about opening up LAX.
All bets are off with how COVID has wreaked havoc on the airlines. AAG will do what they need to make things as cost neutral as possible. Additionally, MQ doesn’t need rafts on the airplanes, only life jackets. 8,000 of them would be sufficient for the fleet, and with all of the 757’s and 767’s that have been parked, I’d be willing to bet there are a lot of them laying around. No trip to the pool is necessary, just a change to the Ops Specs, a CBT or two to the pilots (unpaid as usual because Envoy is kind like that), and it would be done. I am not thirsty” for flying, but given the option between third party contractors and the wholly-owned carriers, I’d much rather see every drop of flying be done by Envoy, PSA, and Piedmont. Since that isn’t realistic, I would take as many efficiencies to the operation that improve things for all involved. |
Originally Posted by HulkaBurger
(Post 3110255)
I think there is one of the latter posting in this thread a few posts above. 😉
|
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110377)
Me!? Not at all, I don’t even park over the B gates. It just gets old to see HI6s like this, “expect scrutiny” , if you ask for additional fuel I’ll have a meeting with you and the CP. Former Crj drivers recall this one.
And if our pilots and other employees would do the right thing, maybe they wouldn't need to send those HI6s. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3110390)
That guy got removed from his job real quick.
And if our pilots and other employees would do the right thing, maybe they wouldn't need to send those HI6s. |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110394)
Don’t you think it should be personally addressed to the pilot, and not in a company wide email? And, for the record, he ONLY got removed because the FAA got involved. If it was for the company, CM would still be there.
He got removed before FAA got involved. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3110400)
Spreading rumors i see.
He got removed before FAA got involved. |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110394)
Don’t you think it should be personally addressed to the pilot, and not in a company wide email? And, for the record, he ONLY got removed because the FAA got involved. If it was for the company, CM would still be there.
|
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3110411)
But TBH, he kind of took one for the team. That attitude was there. Just never publicly stated. After that HI6 was sent out dispatchers became a lot more generous with fuel, likely to PREVENT any possible scrutiny by the FAA. At least until recently. Seems to have been a tightening of the fuel purse strings along with everything else.
Fuel loads went WAY up at the peak of COVID when there were no pax and weird things were happening at ATC. It’s come back towards normal now that the whole system seems to settling in to a new normal. |
Originally Posted by skyemiles2
(Post 3110233)
“Hey idiots, stop ****ing up in ways that can cause aircraft damage?“
|
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3110409)
If my facts are correct, you were not even part of the pilot group at the time, junior! But, hey! Spreading rumors is part of the job description.
|
E75 Count
How many E175s do we have in service that count toward pay band C? I heard payroll updates too pay band captains on a weekly basis despite the list only being published quarterly.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3110632)
N200NN - N292NN are registered to AA, so that would make 92. Where or not they’re all in service, I’m not sure. I think we still have some parked.
N293NN - N302NN have the fees paid, pending registration. how does the pay banding work? Planes in active service, or planes on property? |
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3109857)
A lot of Mesa flying has ALREADY transitioned to ENY. I have no idea if it is/was temporary or long term. Half the OT flying I did this summer was Mesa routes.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3110632)
N200NN - N292NN are registered to AA, so that would make 92. Where or not they’re all in service, I’m not sure. I think we still have some parked.
N293NN - N302NN have the fees paid, pending registration. how does the pay banding work? Planes in active service, or planes on property? |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3110564)
If my facts are correct, I know more about this than you do, senior.
I still appreciate your work in unity! |
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 3110675)
AA replaced a lot of 900s with 145s. These have been slowly returning to the 900. I agree that if demand doesn’t increase AA could cut Mesa to nothing letting the CPA simply expire with no negative repercussions. Fact is, pre Covid that ENY was flying 737 max routes and Mesa was flying 175 routes. It’s all unnecessary now.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands