![]() |
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3257822)
and who’s flying will they be taking with those planes?
|
Originally Posted by 3400
(Post 3257938)
1.) Where are they getting the planes? SkyWest is grabbing every -700 they can find on the planet right now.
2.) Whose flying are they going to take? Things really don’t look good for them. |
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3258207)
so in regards to United’s scope, are they or are they not capped out on large RJs? Or however they classify 700/900’s
|
Originally Posted by CptnDave
(Post 3258428)
If I’m not mistaken at united 50 seaters aren’t limited by scope, so maybe we see them fly the 550? I know that’s what GoJets doing to get around scope.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3258207)
so in regards to United’s scope, are they or are they not capped out on large RJs? Or however they classify 700/900’s
|
Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN
(Post 3257866)
So you think SkyWest is down sizing? They’re currently hiring 200 pilots a month, you can’t get a class date until December. The OO school house is saying they need 7,000 pilots in a year and a half. Does that sound like downsizing to you oh wise one?
wanting and doing are two different things. Republic, Skywest and Mesa will downsize during the shortage. The ones like Commutair, Air Wiskey are in big trouble without serious business model changes. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3258724)
yes, they will be. Not today, but as the shortage worsens (like pre-Covid) their attrition will outpace hiring. Why do you think they predict wanting to be hiring 7,000 over 1.5 years?
wanting and doing are two different things. Republic, Skywest and Mesa will downsize during the shortage. The ones like Commutair, Air Wiskey are in big trouble without serious business model changes. Oh, and trust me, OO will find it’s own way to react to attrition. They could always create a “flow agreement” themselves if it gets that bad. We’ve been offered a flow before. Honestly I don’t think a “flow” is powerful enough to actually hold guys off from having their Apps in, but maybe I’m wrong? |
Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill
(Post 3258728)
Maybe, maybe not. But just to clarify, you’re saying WO’s won’t have this problem as well? So how would they not have attrition issues? Unless you’re saying WO pilots are suckers, and will wait forNever to flow?
Oh, and trust me, OO will find it’s own way to react to attrition. They could always create a “flow agreement” themselves if it gets that bad. We’ve been offered a flow before. Honestly I don’t think a “flow” is powerful enough to actually hold guys off from having their Apps in, but maybe I’m wrong? Then, all the WO will have their flows ramped up even more to provide a 4 year or less flow path to their mainline. The mainlines will do the majority of hiring from their WO. once that happens you’d be a fool to go to a non-WO. Actually, it’s already time if you aren’t already in 121 to focus on WO’s. By the time you upgrade the shortage will stagnate your upgrade at the vendors. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3258850)
all the WO’s are run as cost centers. Unlike contractors, that means they technically do not need to generate a profit themselves, so long as their feed to/from generates profit at the mainline. They can, and likely will be, run at a loss to increase wages, improve working conditions and work rules. Vendors can’t compete.
Then, all the WO will have their flows ramped up even more to provide a 4 year or less flow path to their mainline. The mainlines will do the majority of hiring from their WO. once that happens you’d be a fool to go to a non-WO. Actually, it’s already time if you aren’t already in 121 to focus on WO’s. By the time you upgrade the shortage will stagnate your upgrade at the vendors. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands